Assessment of Learning Ability: A Current Appraisal

  • Gilbert R. Gredler

Abstract

The increasing dissatisfaction with the use of conventional intelligence tests has spurred interest in alternative approaches to the measurement of the learning ability of school children. It is stated that the following problems exist with traditional intelligence tests: (a) cultural bias against lower SES children due largely to the use of white standardisation samples and the heavy verbal emphasis of the tests (Carroll and Seely, 1974); (b) assumption of a normal experiential background (Hamilton and Budoff, 1974); and (c) emphasis on being a measure of innate ability rather than reflecting changes in learning (McClelland, (1973).

Keywords

Income Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, D. B. (1979), A comparison of nonbiased screening procedures to identify high-risk kindergarten children (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms).Google Scholar
  2. Bardsley, J. R. (1979), An exploration of learning potential assessment with learning disabled students (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms).Google Scholar
  3. Bethge, H. G., Carlson, J. S., Wiedl, K. H. (1982), ‘The effects of dynamic assessment procedures on Raven matrices performance, visual search behavior, test anxiety and test orientation’, Intelligence, 6, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, B. S. (1976), Human characteristics and school learning (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L., French, L. A. (1979), ‘The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000’, Intelligence, 3, 255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budoff, M. (1967), ‘Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 404–11.Google Scholar
  7. Budoff, M. (1973), ‘Learning potential and educability among the educable mentally retarded’ (progress report on grant NE.G–00–3–0016 submitted to the National Institute of Education).Google Scholar
  8. Budoff, M. (1975), ‘Measuring learning potential’ in Gredler, G. R. (ed.),Ethical and legal factors in the practice of school psychology (Harrisburg: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania).Google Scholar
  9. Budoff, M., Corman, L. (1973), ‘The effectiveness of group training procedures on the Raven learning potential measure with children from diverse racial and economic backgrounds’, Studies in Learning Potential, 3, no. 58.Google Scholar
  10. Budoff, M., Hamilton, J. L. (1976), ‘Optimizing test performance of moderately and severely retarded adolescents and adults’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 49–57.Google Scholar
  11. Budoff, M., Meskin, J., Harrison, R. (1971), ‘Educational test of the learning-potential hypothesis’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 159–69.Google Scholar
  12. Burkholder, R. B. (1968), The improvement in reading ability through the development of specific underlying or associated mental abilities (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms).Google Scholar
  13. Carlson, J. S. (1979), ‘Towards a differential testing approach: Testing-the-limits employing the Raven matrices’, Intelligence, 4, 323–44.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, J. S. (1981), ‘Reliability of the Raven colored progressive matrices test: Age and ethnic group comparisons’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 320–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlson, J. S. (1983), ‘Applications of dynamic assessment to cognitive and perceptual functioning of three ethnic groups’ (Washington, D. C.: Report to National Institute of Education).Google Scholar
  16. Carroll, H. W., Seely, K. (1974), ‘Historical review of intelligence testing and the handicapped’, Academic Therapy, 10, 141–9.Google Scholar
  17. CIRCUS (1979), Manual. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T. (1979), Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings, (Chicago: Rand McNally).Google Scholar
  19. Covington, M. V. (1967), ‘Stimulus discrimination as a function of social class membership’, Child Development, 38, 607–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cronbach, L. J. (1984), Essentials of psychological testing, 4th edn (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
  21. Dillon, R., Carlson, J. S. (1978), ‘Testing for competence in three ethnic groups’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 437–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feuerstein, R. (1979), The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques, (Baltimore: University Park Press).Google Scholar
  23. Feuerstein, R. (1980), Instrumental enrichment (Baltimore: University Park, 1980).Google Scholar
  24. Gettinger, M. (1978), Is time to-learn or measured intelligence a stronger correlate of school learning? (Ann Arbor: University Microfilm).Google Scholar
  25. Goad, T. L. (1984), ‘A comparison of learning potential and intelligence measures in predicting reading achievement’, unpublished master’s thesis (Columbia: University of South Carolina).Google Scholar
  26. Goodyear, P. R., (1979), ‘The prediction of reading achievement from learning potential and intelligence measures’, unpublished master’s thesis (Columbia: University of South Carolina).Google Scholar
  27. Gredler, G. R. (1978), ‘Learning disabilities and reading disorders: A current assessment’, Psychology in the Schools, 15, 226–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffin, M. (1976), ‘Learning potential stability in relationship to achievement and IQ of learning disabled secondary level students’, unpublished master’s thesis (Lawrence: University of Kansas).Google Scholar
  29. Gupta, R. M., Coxhead, P. (1983), ‘The assessment of the learning efficiency of Asian children’, Collected Original Resources in Education, 7, 3, Fiche 1 A4.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, J. L., Budoff, M. (1974), ‘Learning potential among the moderately and severely retarded’, Mental Retardation, 12, 33–6.Google Scholar
  31. Hamill, D. D. (1971), ‘Evaluating children for instructional purposes’, Academic Therapy, vi, 341–53.Google Scholar
  32. Haynes, J. M. (1971), Educational assessment of immigrant pupils (Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research).Google Scholar
  33. Hennessey, J. J. (1981). Clinical and diagnostic assessment of children’s abilities: Traditional and innovative models. In Merrifield, P. (ed.), Measuring human abilities, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
  34. Ingenkamp, K. (1977), Educational assessment, (Windsor: NFER).Google Scholar
  35. Jensen, A. (1963), ‘Learning ability in retarded, average, and gifted children’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 9, 123–40.Google Scholar
  36. Jensen, A. R. (1981), Straight talk about mental tests, (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  37. Kenney, M. V. (1984), Effects of Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment on the reasoning, non-verbal intelligence, and the locus of control of 12 to 15 year old educable mentally retarded handicapped and learning disabled students, (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, 1984).Google Scholar
  38. Korman, A., Sporer, S. L. (1983), ‘Learning tests–concepts and critical evaluation’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9, 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kunzelmann, H. P., Koenig, C. H. (1981), Manual for refer and learning screening, (Columbus: Charles E. Merrill).Google Scholar
  40. Lambert, N. M., Wilcox, M. R., Gleason, W. P. (1974), The educationally retarded child (New York: Grune and Stratton).Google Scholar
  41. Levine, M., Levine, A. (1970), A social history of helping services, (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).Google Scholar
  42. Mandl, H. (1976), ‘Current views about school readiness tests in Germany with specific reference to their predictive value for identifying potential failure in school’ in Wedell, K., Raybould, E. C., (eds), The early identification of educationally ‘at risk’ children, (Birmingham: Education Review).Google Scholar
  43. McClelland, D. C. (1973), ‘Testing for competence rather than for intelligence’, American Psychologist, 28, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mercer, J. (1973), Labelling the mentally retarded, (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  45. Meyers, J., Pfeffer, J., Erlbaum, V. (1985), ‘Process assessment: A model for broadening assessment’, Journal of Special Education, 19, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neilsen, H. H. (1966), A psychological study of cerebral palsied children, (Copenhagen: Munksgaard).Google Scholar
  47. Newland, E. (1963), ‘Psychological assessment of exceptional children and youth’ in Cruikshank, W. M. (ed.), Psychology of exceptional children and youth, (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  48. Ortar, G. R. (1960), ‘Improving test validity by coaching’, Educational Research, 2, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Platt, J. S. (1974 The effect of the modified Raven’s progressive matrices learning potential coaching procedure on Raven’s post-test scores and their correlation, (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms).Google Scholar
  50. Popoff-Walker, L. E. (1980), The relationship between IQ, SES, adaptive behavior, and performance on a measure of learning potential, (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms).Google Scholar
  51. Popoff-Walker, L. E. (1982), ‘IQ, SES, adaptive behavior and performance on a learning potential measure’, Journal of School Psychology, 20, 222–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pumfrey, P. D. (1985), ‘Just a minute–let me think’, Trainer’s Forum, 5, 1–3.Google Scholar
  53. Pumfrey, P. D., Naylor, J. G. (1983), ‘The alleviation of psycholinguistic deficits and some effects on the reading attainments of poor readers: A sequel’, Journal of Research in Reading, 6, 129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rey, A. (1935), l’intelligence practique chez l’enfant, (Paris: Alcan).Google Scholar
  55. Sattler, J. (1981), Assessment of Children’s Intelligence, (Newton: Allyn and Bacon).Google Scholar
  56. Schubert, J. (1965), ‘Retest scores on intelligence tests as diagnostic indicators’ in J. Loring (ed.), Teaching the cerebral palsied child, (London: William Heinemann).Google Scholar
  57. Scott, G. C. (1950), ‘Measuring Sudanese intelligence’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sewell, T. E. (1979), ‘Intelligence and learning tasks as predictors of scholastic achievement in black and white first grade children’, Journal of School Psychology, 17, 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sewell, T. E., Severson, R. A. (1974), ‘Learning ability and intelligence as cognitive predictors of achievement in first grade black children’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 948–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, C. R. (1980), ‘Assessment alternatives: Non-standardized procedures’, School Psychology Review, 9, 46–57.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, D. C., Martin, R. A. (1967), ‘Use of learning cues with the Bender visual motor gestalt test in screening children for neurological impairment’, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test Manual (1984), (San Antonio: Psychological Corporation).Google Scholar
  63. Suran, B. G., Rizzo, J. V. (1983), Special education: An integrative approach (Glenview: Scott, Foresman).Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, E. (1959) Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral defects, (Cambridge: Harvard University).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wolf, R. K. (1984), Learning potential and its relationship to success on a math problem-solving strategy with junior high learning disabled adolescents, (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms).Google Scholar
  66. Zigler, E., Abelson, W. D., Seitz, V. (1973) ‘Motivational factors of economically disadvantaged children on the Peabody picture vocabulary test’, Child Development, 44, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rajinder M. Gupta and Peter Coxhead 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert R. Gredler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations