Skip to main content

Learning Ability and Psychometric Practice

  • Chapter
Cultural Diversity and Learning Efficiency

Abstract

Assessing children from minority backgrounds — be they ethnic, socioeconomic or disability-related — poses particular problems. Ironically, these children are the ones who have most to gain — or lose — from the assessment process. On the one hand, they stand to benefit from modified curricula and teaching approaches; these modifications have to be devised and implemented on the basis of assessment, and if their needs are to be met it is essential that accurate and relevant information be forthcoming. On the other hand, they can be the victims of inaccurate assessments which damage their self-concepts, lower teachers’ expectations of them and confine them to inappropriate educational programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Babad, E., Budoff, M. (1974a), ‘A Manual for the Series Learning Potential Test’, unpublished paper, Cambridge Massachusetts: Research Inst. for Educ. Problems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., Budoff, M. (1974b), ‘Sensitivity and validity of learning potential measurement in three levels of ability’, Journal Educ. Psycho., 66, 3, 439–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. B., Harbin, G. L. (1980), ‘Nondiscriminatory Evaluation’, Exceptional Children, 46, 8, 590–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, F. W. (1984), ‘Another look at the effects of the system of multicultural pluralistic assessment’, Journal of School Psycho. 22, 347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budoff, M. (1969), ‘Learning potential: a supplementary procedure for assessing the ability to reason’, Seminars in Psychiatry, 1, 278–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budoff, M., Corman, L., Litzinger, S. (1973), ‘A manual for the Raven’s Learning Potential Test’, Studies in Learning Potential, 3, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, R. A. (1979), ‘The System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment’, School Psychology Digest., 8, 1, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967), The Nature of Human Intelligence (New York: McGraw Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthke, J. (1982), ‘The learning test concept–an alternative to the traditional static intelligence test’, German J. of Psychol, 6, 4, 306–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. M. (1971), Educational Assessment of Immigrant Pupils (Slough: NEFR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heese, K. W. (1942), ‘A general factor in improvement in practice’, Psychometrika, 7, 213–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, S. (1978), Manual for the NFER Test of Learning Ability (individual form) (Windsor: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, S., Lucas, D. (1978), Able to Learn? The pursuit of culture fair assessment (Windsor: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, M. H. (1975), Learning Ability Profile (Denver: Falcon R and D). Husband, R. W. (1939), ‘Intercorrelations among learning abilities’, J. genet. Psychol. 55, 353–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1963), ‘Learning ability in retarded, average and gifted children’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behay. and Dev., 9, 2, 123–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirsa, J. E. (1983), SOMPA: ‘A brief examination of technical considerations, philosophical rationale, and implications for practice’, J. School Psychol, 21, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Sandor (1983), ‘Intelligence and learning potential theory and practice’, Newsletter of the International Test Commission, 19, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J., Lewis, J. F. (1978), System of multi-cultural pluralistic assessment: Conceptual and technical manual (Riverside Ca: Institute for Pluralistic Assessment Research and Training).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T. (1979), ‘Research on the adaptive behaviour inventory for children and the estimated learning potential’, School Psychology Digest, 8, 1, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1979), ‘Evaluation of the effects of SOMPA measures on classification of students as mentally retarded’, Amer. Journ. of Mental Deficiency, 86, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962, originally published 1934), Thought and Language (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetton, C., Childs, R. (1981), ‘The effects of item by item feedback given during an ability test’, Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. 1, 51, 336–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H. (1938), ‘The relation between abilities and improvement with practice’, J. educ. Psychol., 29, 215–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonge, G. D. (1982), ‘Some concerns about the estimation of learning potential from the system of multicultural pluralistic assessment’, Psychology in the Schools, 19, 482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Rajinder M. Gupta and Peter Coxhead

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hegarty, S. (1988). Learning Ability and Psychometric Practice. In: Gupta, R.M., Coxhead, P. (eds) Cultural Diversity and Learning Efficiency. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19131-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics