Abstract
The First World War had changed the lives of middle-class women in two ways: it had made available to them opportunities for paid work outside the home, and in many cases it had left them without any domestic help. By 1920, nearly two-thirds of the women who had taken jobs during the war had left them again, and the ‘servant problem’ became a subject worthy of government consideration.1 Only a few weeks after the war ended, the Ministry of Reconstruction had set its Women’s Advisory Committee to work on the ‘Domestic Service Problem’. The Committee reported in March 1919, its main conclusion being that the present system of low-paid, unskilled and inefficient domestic service could be improved by the introduction of training courses, which would encourage women to see domestic service as a skilled occupation.2 The total number of people employed as servants had decreased by about one-third during the war, but the slump of 1920 resulted in many women returning to domestic service.3 The general trend in servant numbers between 1881 and 1931 was upward, but because of the increasing population, and in particular the growth of the middle class during the war, the percentage of households with resident servants declined.4 Expenditure on domestic service only decreased dramatically after the Second World War.5
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Marwick, Arthur (1977), Women at War 1914–1918, Fontana, Glasgow, p. 162.
Ministry of Reconstruction (1919), Report of the Women’s Advisory Committee on the Domestic Service Problem, Cmd. 67, HMSO, London, pp. 2, 4.
Marwick, Arthur (1967), The Deluge, Penguin, Harmondsworth, p. 327.
Ibid., pp. 326–7; Political and Economic Planning (1945), The Market for Household Appliances; PEP, London, p. 25.
Stone, Richard and Rowe, D. A. (1966), The Measurement of Consumers’ Expenditure and Behaviour in the United Kingdom 1920–1938, CUP, Cambridge, p. 27.
Ministry of Labour (1923), Report of the Committee appointed to Enquire into the Present Conditions as to the Supply of Female Domestic Servants, HMSO, London, p. 41; (1945), PEP The Market, p. 26.
White, Cynthia, L. (1970), Women’s Magazines 1693–1968, Michael Joseph, London, p. 103;
Beaumann, Nicola (1983), A Very Great Profession, Virago, London, p. 109.
Phillips, R. Randal (1923), The Servantless House, Country Life, London (first ed. 1920), pp. 9, 147.
Forty, Adrian (1975), The Electric Home, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, p. 42;
Whyte, Adam Gowans (1922), The All-electric Age, Constable, London.
Sillitoe, Helen (1933), A History of the Teaching of Domestic Subjects, Methuen, London, pp. 216–17.
Eyles, Leonora (1923), ‘What is a Woman to Do?’, Good Housekeeping, Nov, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 35, 120, 122–3, see p. 122. See also
Eyles, Margaret Leonora (1922), The Woman in the Little House, Grant Richards, London, pp. 123–6.
George, W. L. (1923), ‘What is a Home?’, Good Housekeeping, July, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 11–12, 80, see p. 80;
Burnett, John (1968), Plenty and Want, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 294–6.
George, W. L. (1923), ‘No Housewives, No Homes’, Good Housekeeping, Aug, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 9–10, 72.
Seymour, Beatrice Kean (1924), ‘The Houses Men Build for Us’, Good Housekeeping, April, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 182, 184, 186–7. See pp. 182, 187.
Pearsall, E. B. (1920), ‘Co-operative Houses at Letchworth’, Garden Cities and Town Planning Magazine, Aug, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 174–5.
RIBA biography files; Miller, Mervyn (1978), Letchworth Garden City 1903–1978, North Hertfordshire District Council, p. 74.
Swenarton, Mark (1981), Homes Fit for Heroes, Heinemann Educational Books, London, pp. 60–1.
Purdom, C. B. (1925), The Building of Satellite Towns, Dent, London, p. 65.
Hebbert, Michael (1981), ‘Frederic Osborn 1885–1978’, pp. 177–202 in Gordon E. Cherry (ed.), Pioneers in British Planning, Architectural Press, London, pp. 179–80;
Macfadyen, Dugald (1933), Sir Ebenezer Howard and the Town Planning Movement, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 100–1.
Schaffer, Frank (1972), The New Town Story, Granada, London, pp. 23–4.
Ministry of Health (1921), Report of the Sub-Committee of the Housing Advisory Council on Co-operative and Communal Arrangements, HMSO, London. See above, Chap. 8, p. 154.
Both groups of flats were managed by the United Women’s Homes Association. See Slack, Kathleen M. (1982), Henrietta’s Dream, Slack, London, pp. 97–8 and
Green, Brigid Grafton (1977), Hampstead Garden Suburb 1907–1977, Hampstead Garden Suburb Residents Association, p. 16.
Darley, Gillian (1978), Villages of Vision, Granada, St Albans, p. 139;
Scott, Richenda (1955), Elizabeth Cadbury 1858–1951, Harrap, London, p. 91.
Ibid., p. 135; Bournville Village Trust (1928), Bournville Housing, BVT, Birmingham, p. 37.
Merrett, Stephen (1979), State Housing in Britain, RKP, London, p. 51.
Ibid., pp. 52, 61; Daunton, M J. (1983), House and Home in the Victorian City, Edward Arnold, London, p. 294.
Stevenson, John (1984), British Society 1914–45, Penguin, Har-mondsworth, pp. 170, 175, 184–5;
Oakley, Ann (1982), Subject Women, Fontana, Glasgow, pp. 146–7.
Holtby, Winifred (1934), Women and a Changing Civilization, Bodley Head, London, p. 191.
Stevenson, British Society, p. 169; Holcombe, Lee (1983), Wives and Property, Martin Robertson, Oxford, pp. 24, 222.
Edwards, Elsie E. (1935), Report on Electricity in Working-class Homes, Electrical Association for Women, London, p. 47.
Ravetz, Alison (1974), Model Estate, Croom Helm, London, pp. 50, 89;
Ravetz, Alison (1974), ‘From Working-class Tenement to Modern Flat: Local Authorities and Multi-storey Housing between the Wars’, pp. 122–50 in Anthony Sutcliffe (ed.), Multi-storey Living, Croom Helm, London, see p. 143.
Frampton, Kenneth (1980), Modern Architecture, a Critical History, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 155–6.
Willett, John (1978), The New Sobriety 1917–1933, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 124–8.
Coe, Peter and Reading, Malcolm (1981), Lubetkin and Tecton, Arts Council of Great Britain, London, p. 121;
Jones, Edward and Woodward, Christopher (1983), A Guide to the Architecture of London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, pp. 344–5.
Bayley, Stephen (1975), The Modern Flat, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, p. 69.
Oliver, Paul, Davis, Ian and Bentley, Ian (1981), Dunroamin, Barrie and Jenkins, London, pp. 13, 50.
Calder, Angus (1971), The People’s War, Panther, London, pp. 309, 382–3.
Burnett, Plenty, p. 345; Marwick, Arthur (1982), British Society since 1945, Penguin, Harmondsworth, p. 18.
Beveridge, Sir William (1942), Report on the Social Insurance and Allied Services, Cmd. 6404, HMSO, London, pp. 132–3;
McDowell, L. (1983), ‘Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, March, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–72. See pp. 63–4.
See also Burton, Elaine (1944), Domestic Work, Frederick Müller, London, p. 12.
Craig, F. W. S. (1975), British General Election Manifestos 1900–1974, Macmillan, London, pp. 124, 129;
Labour Party (1943), Your Home planned by Labour, London, p. 2.
Foot, Michael (1975), Aneurin Bevan 1945–1960, Granada, St Albans, p. 66.
Wilson, Janet C. (1949), ‘An Inquiry into Communal Laundry Facilities’, Ministry of Works National Building Studies Special Report No. 9, HMSO, London, pp. 21, 32.
Gaffin, Jean and Thorns, David (1983), Caring and Sharing, Cooperative Union, Manchester, see section on ‘Housing 1945–51’.
Wilson, Elizabeth (1980), Only Halfway to Paradise, Tavistock, London, p. 21; quotation from Ian Mikardo.
Wright, Myles (1982), Lord Leverhulme’s Unknown Venture, Hutchinson Benham, London, pp. 206, 212.
Ibid., p. 68; Wolfe, Lawrence (1945), The Reilly Plan, Nicholson and Watson, London, pp. 14, 98–103.
Wright, Lord Leverhulme, p. 204; Allan, Adrian R. and Turner, Sheila M. (1981), ‘The Papers of Sir Charles Reilly’, Planning History Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 18–22, see pp. 20–1.
Ravetz, ‘From Working-class Tenement’, p. 146; Cooney, E. W. (1974), ‘High Flats in Local Authority Housing in England and Wales since 1945’, pp. 151–80 in Anthony Sutcliffe (ed.), Multi-storey Living, Croom Helm, London, p. 152.
Anderson, Frances M. D. (1983), ‘Multi-storey Council Housing’, unpub. M. Soc. Sei. thesis, Faculty of Commerce and Social Science, University of Birmingham, pp. 110–11.
Marwick, British Society, p. 68; Hole, W. V. and Attenburrow, J. J. (1966), Houses and People, HMSO, London, p. 59.
Merrett, State Housing, p. 103; Ministry of Housing and Local Government (1961), Homes for Today and Tomorrow, HMSO, London, known as the Parker Morris Report.
Burnett, John (1980), A Social History of Housing 1815–1970, Methuen, London, pp. 295–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Lynn F. Pearson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pearson, L.F. (1988). The Movement Declines. In: The Architectural and Social History of Cooperative Living. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19122-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19122-2_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19124-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19122-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)