Skip to main content
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

The First World War had changed the lives of middle-class women in two ways: it had made available to them opportunities for paid work outside the home, and in many cases it had left them without any domestic help. By 1920, nearly two-thirds of the women who had taken jobs during the war had left them again, and the ‘servant problem’ became a subject worthy of government consideration.1 Only a few weeks after the war ended, the Ministry of Reconstruction had set its Women’s Advisory Committee to work on the ‘Domestic Service Problem’. The Committee reported in March 1919, its main conclusion being that the present system of low-paid, unskilled and inefficient domestic service could be improved by the introduction of training courses, which would encourage women to see domestic service as a skilled occupation.2 The total number of people employed as servants had decreased by about one-third during the war, but the slump of 1920 resulted in many women returning to domestic service.3 The general trend in servant numbers between 1881 and 1931 was upward, but because of the increasing population, and in particular the growth of the middle class during the war, the percentage of households with resident servants declined.4 Expenditure on domestic service only decreased dramatically after the Second World War.5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Marwick, Arthur (1977), Women at War 1914–1918, Fontana, Glasgow, p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of Reconstruction (1919), Report of the Women’s Advisory Committee on the Domestic Service Problem, Cmd. 67, HMSO, London, pp. 2, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marwick, Arthur (1967), The Deluge, Penguin, Harmondsworth, p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., pp. 326–7; Political and Economic Planning (1945), The Market for Household Appliances; PEP, London, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stone, Richard and Rowe, D. A. (1966), The Measurement of Consumers’ Expenditure and Behaviour in the United Kingdom 1920–1938, CUP, Cambridge, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Labour (1923), Report of the Committee appointed to Enquire into the Present Conditions as to the Supply of Female Domestic Servants, HMSO, London, p. 41; (1945), PEP The Market, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. White, Cynthia, L. (1970), Women’s Magazines 1693–1968, Michael Joseph, London, p. 103;

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beaumann, Nicola (1983), A Very Great Profession, Virago, London, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips, R. Randal (1923), The Servantless House, Country Life, London (first ed. 1920), pp. 9, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forty, Adrian (1975), The Electric Home, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, p. 42;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whyte, Adam Gowans (1922), The All-electric Age, Constable, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sillitoe, Helen (1933), A History of the Teaching of Domestic Subjects, Methuen, London, pp. 216–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eyles, Leonora (1923), ‘What is a Woman to Do?’, Good Housekeeping, Nov, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 35, 120, 122–3, see p. 122. See also

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eyles, Margaret Leonora (1922), The Woman in the Little House, Grant Richards, London, pp. 123–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. George, W. L. (1923), ‘What is a Home?’, Good Housekeeping, July, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 11–12, 80, see p. 80;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burnett, John (1968), Plenty and Want, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 294–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. George, W. L. (1923), ‘No Housewives, No Homes’, Good Housekeeping, Aug, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 9–10, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seymour, Beatrice Kean (1924), ‘The Houses Men Build for Us’, Good Housekeeping, April, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 182, 184, 186–7. See pp. 182, 187.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pearsall, E. B. (1920), ‘Co-operative Houses at Letchworth’, Garden Cities and Town Planning Magazine, Aug, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 174–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. RIBA biography files; Miller, Mervyn (1978), Letchworth Garden City 1903–1978, North Hertfordshire District Council, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swenarton, Mark (1981), Homes Fit for Heroes, Heinemann Educational Books, London, pp. 60–1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Purdom, C. B. (1925), The Building of Satellite Towns, Dent, London, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hebbert, Michael (1981), ‘Frederic Osborn 1885–1978’, pp. 177–202 in Gordon E. Cherry (ed.), Pioneers in British Planning, Architectural Press, London, pp. 179–80;

    Google Scholar 

  24. Macfadyen, Dugald (1933), Sir Ebenezer Howard and the Town Planning Movement, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 100–1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schaffer, Frank (1972), The New Town Story, Granada, London, pp. 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ministry of Health (1921), Report of the Sub-Committee of the Housing Advisory Council on Co-operative and Communal Arrangements, HMSO, London. See above, Chap. 8, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Both groups of flats were managed by the United Women’s Homes Association. See Slack, Kathleen M. (1982), Henrietta’s Dream, Slack, London, pp. 97–8 and

    Google Scholar 

  28. Green, Brigid Grafton (1977), Hampstead Garden Suburb 1907–1977, Hampstead Garden Suburb Residents Association, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Darley, Gillian (1978), Villages of Vision, Granada, St Albans, p. 139;

    Google Scholar 

  30. Scott, Richenda (1955), Elizabeth Cadbury 1858–1951, Harrap, London, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 135; Bournville Village Trust (1928), Bournville Housing, BVT, Birmingham, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Merrett, Stephen (1979), State Housing in Britain, RKP, London, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., pp. 52, 61; Daunton, M J. (1983), House and Home in the Victorian City, Edward Arnold, London, p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stevenson, John (1984), British Society 1914–45, Penguin, Har-mondsworth, pp. 170, 175, 184–5;

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oakley, Ann (1982), Subject Women, Fontana, Glasgow, pp. 146–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Holtby, Winifred (1934), Women and a Changing Civilization, Bodley Head, London, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stevenson, British Society, p. 169; Holcombe, Lee (1983), Wives and Property, Martin Robertson, Oxford, pp. 24, 222.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Edwards, Elsie E. (1935), Report on Electricity in Working-class Homes, Electrical Association for Women, London, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ravetz, Alison (1974), Model Estate, Croom Helm, London, pp. 50, 89;

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ravetz, Alison (1974), ‘From Working-class Tenement to Modern Flat: Local Authorities and Multi-storey Housing between the Wars’, pp. 122–50 in Anthony Sutcliffe (ed.), Multi-storey Living, Croom Helm, London, see p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Frampton, Kenneth (1980), Modern Architecture, a Critical History, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 155–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Willett, John (1978), The New Sobriety 1917–1933, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 124–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Coe, Peter and Reading, Malcolm (1981), Lubetkin and Tecton, Arts Council of Great Britain, London, p. 121;

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, Edward and Woodward, Christopher (1983), A Guide to the Architecture of London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, pp. 344–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bayley, Stephen (1975), The Modern Flat, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oliver, Paul, Davis, Ian and Bentley, Ian (1981), Dunroamin, Barrie and Jenkins, London, pp. 13, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Calder, Angus (1971), The People’s War, Panther, London, pp. 309, 382–3.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Burnett, Plenty, p. 345; Marwick, Arthur (1982), British Society since 1945, Penguin, Harmondsworth, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Beveridge, Sir William (1942), Report on the Social Insurance and Allied Services, Cmd. 6404, HMSO, London, pp. 132–3;

    Google Scholar 

  50. McDowell, L. (1983), ‘Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, March, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–72. See pp. 63–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. See also Burton, Elaine (1944), Domestic Work, Frederick Müller, London, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Craig, F. W. S. (1975), British General Election Manifestos 1900–1974, Macmillan, London, pp. 124, 129;

    Google Scholar 

  53. Labour Party (1943), Your Home planned by Labour, London, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Foot, Michael (1975), Aneurin Bevan 1945–1960, Granada, St Albans, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wilson, Janet C. (1949), ‘An Inquiry into Communal Laundry Facilities’, Ministry of Works National Building Studies Special Report No. 9, HMSO, London, pp. 21, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gaffin, Jean and Thorns, David (1983), Caring and Sharing, Cooperative Union, Manchester, see section on ‘Housing 1945–51’.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wilson, Elizabeth (1980), Only Halfway to Paradise, Tavistock, London, p. 21; quotation from Ian Mikardo.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wright, Myles (1982), Lord Leverhulme’s Unknown Venture, Hutchinson Benham, London, pp. 206, 212.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., p. 68; Wolfe, Lawrence (1945), The Reilly Plan, Nicholson and Watson, London, pp. 14, 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wright, Lord Leverhulme, p. 204; Allan, Adrian R. and Turner, Sheila M. (1981), ‘The Papers of Sir Charles Reilly’, Planning History Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 18–22, see pp. 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ravetz, ‘From Working-class Tenement’, p. 146; Cooney, E. W. (1974), ‘High Flats in Local Authority Housing in England and Wales since 1945’, pp. 151–80 in Anthony Sutcliffe (ed.), Multi-storey Living, Croom Helm, London, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Anderson, Frances M. D. (1983), ‘Multi-storey Council Housing’, unpub. M. Soc. Sei. thesis, Faculty of Commerce and Social Science, University of Birmingham, pp. 110–11.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Marwick, British Society, p. 68; Hole, W. V. and Attenburrow, J. J. (1966), Houses and People, HMSO, London, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Merrett, State Housing, p. 103; Ministry of Housing and Local Government (1961), Homes for Today and Tomorrow, HMSO, London, known as the Parker Morris Report.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Burnett, John (1980), A Social History of Housing 1815–1970, Methuen, London, pp. 295–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Lynn F. Pearson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearson, L.F. (1988). The Movement Declines. In: The Architectural and Social History of Cooperative Living. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19122-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19122-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19124-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19122-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics