Skip to main content
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

The second half of the nineteenth century saw women begin to break free from the constraints of their domestic sphere of life. The range of activities it was acceptable for them to undertake gradually enlarged, and more women began to take paid jobs outside the home. Working-class women had, of course, always worked, whether inside or outside the home, and many middle-class women also had to do domestic work.1 The upper and upper-middle classes had their charitable work, which could be fitted in around the household routine.2 These domestic occupations were essentially for married women, although daughters were expected to do their share in the household before they left home on marriage. A society which perceived women only in so far as they were attached to men was therefore faced with a problem when the number of women exceeded men; in 1871, there were almost 600 000 more women than men aged 20 or older in England and Wales.3 Fathers were responsible for their daughters until marriage, but if marriage was postponed indefinitely, this could result in a strain on family finances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Branca, Patricia (1975), Silent Sisterhood, Croom Helm, London, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prochaska, F. K. (1980), Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-century England, OUP, London, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The lancet, 30 March 1867, p. 401, quoted in Harrison, Brian (1981), ‘Women’s Health and the Women’s Movement in Britain: 1840–1940’, pp. 15–71 in Charles Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine and Society 1840–1940. CUP, Cambridge. See p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greg, W. R. (1862), ‘Why are Women Redundant’, National Review, April, as quoted in Rosen, Andrew (1974), Rise up, Women!, RKP, London, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matthews, Jacquie (1983), ‘Barbara Bodichon: Integrity in Diversity’, pp. 90–123 in Dale Spender (ed.), Feminist Theorists, The Women’s Press, London. See p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callen, Anthea (1980), Women in the Arts and Crafts Movement 1870–1914, Astragal Books, London, pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidoff, Leonore and Hall, Catherine (1983), ‘The Architecture of Public and Private Life’, pp. 327–45 in Derek Fraser and Anthony Sutcliffe (eds), The Pursuit of Urban History, Edward Arnold, London, pp. 343–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wells, H. G. (1980), Ann Veronica, Virago, London (first pub. 1909) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feilding, Lady Mary (1887), ‘Help without Charity for Gentlewomen, by Money Invested in Flats and Producing Fair Interest’, Work and Leisure, Sept, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 236–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feilding, Lady Mary (1887), ‘How Associated Dwellings may be Carried Out’, Work and Leisure, Nov, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 287–9. See p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Twining, Louisa (1887), ‘A Castle in the Air’, Work and Leisure, Oct, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 283–4; Twining writes that she has been advocating the advantages of associated homes for over 25 years, the obstacles being the independence and ‘insularity’ of English women, and the high cost of buildings and land in London. A. G. G. (1887), ‘Argument for Associated Dwellings for Gentlewomen’, Work and Leisure, Nov, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 286–7; Feilding, Lady Mary (1887), Work and Leisure, ‘How Associated Dwellings may be Carried Out’, Nov, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 287–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holcombe, Lee (1983), Wives and Property, Martin Robertson, Oxford, p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perks, Sydney (1905), Residential Flats of all Classes, Batsford, London, p. 158. The York Street Chambers still exist, the plaque giving their name and date of building clearly visible on the Wyndham Street side.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hobhouse, Emily (1900), ‘Women Workers: How they Live, How they Wish to Live’, Nineteenth Century, March, vol. 47, no. 277, pp. 471–84. Hobhouse later exposed the use of concentration camps by the British in the Boer War.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Pakenham, Thomas (1982), The Boer War, Futura, London, p. 503ff. For work with Women’s Industrial Council,

    Google Scholar 

  16. see Fisher, John (1971), That Miss Hobhouse, Secker and Warburg, London, p. 67;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fry, A. Ruth (1929), Emily Hobhouse, Cape, London, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Higgs, Mary and Hayward, Edward E. (1910), Where shall she Live?, P. S. King, London, pp. 180–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Lynn F. Pearson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearson, L.F. (1988). Homes for Working Women. In: The Architectural and Social History of Cooperative Living. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19122-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19122-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19124-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19122-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics