A Two-step Procedure for Analysing Multi-level Structured Data

  • P. van den Eeden


This chapter discusses how a proposition on multi-level structured data (MSD) can be studied. We will argue that for the purpose of analysing MSD, the ‘conditional individual differences’ model of Davis, Spaeth and Huson (1961) is preferable. In this model group-specific parameters of individual level relationships are presumed to be dependent on group characteristics.


Contextual Variable Disturbance Term Collective Phenomenon Occupation Father Average Recommendation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ALWIN, D. F., ‘Assessing School Effects: some Identities’, Sociology of Education, 49 (1976) 94–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BLOK, H. and SARIS, W. E., ‘Relevante Variabelen bij het Doorverwijzen na de Lagere School: een Structured Model’, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs-research, 5 (1980) 63–79.Google Scholar
  3. BOYD, L. H., 1971, ‘Multiple Level Analysis with Complete and Incomplete Data’ (University of Michigan).Google Scholar
  4. — and G. K. IVERSEN, Contextual Analysis: concepts and statistical techniques (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1979).Google Scholar
  5. BURSTEIN, L., ‘The Analysis of Multi-level Data in Educational Research and Evaluation’, in BERLINER, D. (ed.) Review of Research in Education (Washington: American Research Association, 1980) 158–233.Google Scholar
  6. — LINN, R. L. and CAPELL, F. ‘Analyzing Multiple Data in the Presence of Heterogeneous Within-class Regression’, Journal of Educational Statistics, 3 (1978) 347–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CRONBACH, L. J., Research on Classrooms and Schools: Formulations of Questions, Design, and Analysis (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Evaluation Consortium, 1976).Google Scholar
  8. DAVIS, J. A., SPAETH, J. L. and HUSON, C. ‘A Technique for Analyzing the Effects of Group Composition’, American Sociological Review, 26 (1961) 215–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EEDEN, P. van den and SARIS, W. E., ‘Empirisch Onderzoek naar Multi-level Uitspraken’, Mens en Maatschappij, 59 (1984) 165–78.Google Scholar
  10. FIREBAUGH, G., ‘A Rule for Inferring Individual Level Relationships from Aggregate Data’, American Sociological Review, 43 (1978) 555–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HANNAN, M. T., Aggregation and Disaggregation in Sociology (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1971).Google Scholar
  12. HANUSHEK, E. A. and JACKSON, J. E., Statistical Methods for Social Scientists (New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  13. HARDER, Th. and PAPPI, F. U., ‘Multi-level Regression Analysis of Survey and Ecological Data’, Social Science Information, 8 (1969) 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. HÜTTNER, H. J. M., ‘De Multi-level Analyse: een Toepassing and Evaluatie van het Model’, Sociologische Gids, 20 (1973) 42–58.Google Scholar
  15. IGRA, A., ‘Three Methods of Estimating a Model of Group Effects: a Comparison with Reference to School Effect Studies’, Sociological Methods and Research, 9 (1980) 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. JÖRESKOG, H. G. and D. SÖRBOM, LISREL V: Analysis of Linear Structural Relations by Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Methods (Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics (Research report 81–8), 1981).Google Scholar
  17. LAZARSFELD, P. F., ‘Problems in Methodology’, in MERTON, R. K. and LAZARSFELD, P. F. (eds) Sociology Today (New York: Basic Books, 1959) 39–78.Google Scholar
  18. LINDENBERG, S., ‘De Structuur van Theorieën van Kollektieve Verschijnselen’, in ARTS, W., LINDENBERG, S. and WIPPLER, R. (eds) Gedrag en structuur (Rotterdam: UPR, 1976) 1–20.Google Scholar
  19. — 1977, ‘Individuelle Effekte, Kollektive Phänomene und das Problem der Transformation’, in EICHNER, K. and HABERMEHL, W. (eds) Probleme der Erklärung Sozialen Verhaltens (Meisenheim am Glau: Verlag Anton Hahn, 1977) 46–84.Google Scholar
  20. NELSON, J. L., ‘High School Context and College Plans: the Impact of Social Structure on Aspirations’, American Sociological Review, 37 (1972) 143–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PAPPI, F. U., Sozialstruktur und Politische Konflikte in der Bundesrepublik: Individual and Kontextanalyse der Wahlentscheidung (Köln: Universität Köln, 1978).Google Scholar
  22. PESCHAR, J. L., Milieu, School, Beroep: een Achterafexperiment over de Periode 1958–1973 naar de Invloed van het Sociaal Milieu op School en Beroepsloopbaan (Groningen: BRV, 1975).Google Scholar
  23. SARIS, W. E. and BLOK, H., ‘Het Onderwijzersadvies Nader Bekeken’, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 7 (1982) 49–59.Google Scholar
  24. SØRENSEN, AA. and HALLINAN, M. T., ‘A Conceptualization of School Effects’, Sociology of Education, 50 (1977) 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SPADY, W. G., ‘The Impact of School Resources on Students’, in KERLINGER, F. N. (ed.) Review of Research in Education (Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1973) 135–77.Google Scholar
  26. SPRAGUE, J., ‘Is There a Micro Theory Consistent with Contextual Analysis?’, in OSTROM, E. (ed.) Strategies of Political Inquiry (Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi: Sage, 1982) 99–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Willem E. Saris and Irmtraud N. Gallhofer 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. van den Eeden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations