Skip to main content

A Two-step Procedure for Analysing Multi-level Structured Data

  • Chapter
Sociometric Research

Abstract

This chapter discusses how a proposition on multi-level structured data (MSD) can be studied. We will argue that for the purpose of analysing MSD, the ‘conditional individual differences’ model of Davis, Spaeth and Huson (1961) is preferable. In this model group-specific parameters of individual level relationships are presumed to be dependent on group characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ALWIN, D. F., ‘Assessing School Effects: some Identities’, Sociology of Education, 49 (1976) 94–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BLOK, H. and SARIS, W. E., ‘Relevante Variabelen bij het Doorverwijzen na de Lagere School: een Structured Model’, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs-research, 5 (1980) 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOYD, L. H., 1971, ‘Multiple Level Analysis with Complete and Incomplete Data’ (University of Michigan).

    Google Scholar 

  • — and G. K. IVERSEN, Contextual Analysis: concepts and statistical techniques (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURSTEIN, L., ‘The Analysis of Multi-level Data in Educational Research and Evaluation’, in BERLINER, D. (ed.) Review of Research in Education (Washington: American Research Association, 1980) 158–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • — LINN, R. L. and CAPELL, F. ‘Analyzing Multiple Data in the Presence of Heterogeneous Within-class Regression’, Journal of Educational Statistics, 3 (1978) 347–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRONBACH, L. J., Research on Classrooms and Schools: Formulations of Questions, Design, and Analysis (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Evaluation Consortium, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, J. A., SPAETH, J. L. and HUSON, C. ‘A Technique for Analyzing the Effects of Group Composition’, American Sociological Review, 26 (1961) 215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEDEN, P. van den and SARIS, W. E., ‘Empirisch Onderzoek naar Multi-level Uitspraken’, Mens en Maatschappij, 59 (1984) 165–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIREBAUGH, G., ‘A Rule for Inferring Individual Level Relationships from Aggregate Data’, American Sociological Review, 43 (1978) 555–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HANNAN, M. T., Aggregation and Disaggregation in Sociology (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • HANUSHEK, E. A. and JACKSON, J. E., Statistical Methods for Social Scientists (New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDER, Th. and PAPPI, F. U., ‘Multi-level Regression Analysis of Survey and Ecological Data’, Social Science Information, 8 (1969) 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HÃœTTNER, H. J. M., ‘De Multi-level Analyse: een Toepassing and Evaluatie van het Model’, Sociologische Gids, 20 (1973) 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGRA, A., ‘Three Methods of Estimating a Model of Group Effects: a Comparison with Reference to School Effect Studies’, Sociological Methods and Research, 9 (1980) 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JÖRESKOG, H. G. and D. SÖRBOM, LISREL V: Analysis of Linear Structural Relations by Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Methods (Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics (Research report 81–8), 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZARSFELD, P. F., ‘Problems in Methodology’, in MERTON, R. K. and LAZARSFELD, P. F. (eds) Sociology Today (New York: Basic Books, 1959) 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDENBERG, S., ‘De Structuur van Theorieën van Kollektieve Verschijnselen’, in ARTS, W., LINDENBERG, S. and WIPPLER, R. (eds) Gedrag en structuur (Rotterdam: UPR, 1976) 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977, ‘Individuelle Effekte, Kollektive Phänomene und das Problem der Transformation’, in EICHNER, K. and HABERMEHL, W. (eds) Probleme der Erklärung Sozialen Verhaltens (Meisenheim am Glau: Verlag Anton Hahn, 1977) 46–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, J. L., ‘High School Context and College Plans: the Impact of Social Structure on Aspirations’, American Sociological Review, 37 (1972) 143–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAPPI, F. U., Sozialstruktur und Politische Konflikte in der Bundesrepublik: Individual and Kontextanalyse der Wahlentscheidung (Köln: Universität Köln, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • PESCHAR, J. L., Milieu, School, Beroep: een Achterafexperiment over de Periode 1958–1973 naar de Invloed van het Sociaal Milieu op School en Beroepsloopbaan (Groningen: BRV, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARIS, W. E. and BLOK, H., ‘Het Onderwijzersadvies Nader Bekeken’, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 7 (1982) 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • SØRENSEN, AA. and HALLINAN, M. T., ‘A Conceptualization of School Effects’, Sociology of Education, 50 (1977) 273–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPADY, W. G., ‘The Impact of School Resources on Students’, in KERLINGER, F. N. (ed.) Review of Research in Education (Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1973) 135–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPRAGUE, J., ‘Is There a Micro Theory Consistent with Contextual Analysis?’, in OSTROM, E. (ed.) Strategies of Political Inquiry (Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi: Sage, 1982) 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Willem E. Saris and Irmtraud N. Gallhofer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Eeden, P. (1988). A Two-step Procedure for Analysing Multi-level Structured Data. In: Saris, W.E., Gallhofer, I.N. (eds) Sociometric Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19054-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics