Skip to main content

Individual Response Functions and Correlations between Judgements

  • Chapter
Sociometric Research

Abstract

In survey research many variables are measured by the answers to single questions. This makes it impossible to study the way a respondent expresses his/her opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ANDERSON, N. H., ‘Cognitive Algebra and Social Psychophysics’, in WEGENER, B. (ed.) Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement (Hillsdale: Earlbaum, 1982) 123–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIDSON, M. L., ‘On a Metric Unidimensional Unfolding Model for Attitudinal and Developmental Data’, Psychometrika, 42 (1977) 523–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUTTMAN, L., ‘A New Approach to Factor Analysis: The Radex’, in LAZERSFELD, P. F. (ed.) Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Free Press, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMBLIN, R. L., ‘Social Attitudes: Magnitude Measurement and Theory’, in BLALOCK, H. M. (ed.) Measurement in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Aldine, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • LODGE, M., Magnitude scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • RULE, S. J. and CURTIS, D. W., ‘Levels of Sensory and Judgemental Processing: Strategies for the Evaluation of a Model’, in WEGENER, B. (ed.) Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement (Hillsdale: Earlbaum, 1982) 107–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • SARIS, W. E., Variation in Response Behaviour: A Source of measurement Error in Survey Research (Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— BRUINSMA, C., SCHOOTS, W. and VERMEULEN, C., ‘The Use of Magnitude Estimation in Large-scale Survey Research’, Mens en Maatschappij (1977) 369–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— NEIJENS, P. and VAN DOORN, L., ‘Scaling Social Science Variables by Cross Modality Matching’, MDN, 5 (1980) 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIP, H., MAAS, K. and SARIS, W. E., Auto correlation in judgements, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • STEVENS, S. S., Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects (New York: Wiley & Son, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • WAGENAAR, W. A., ‘Misperception of Exponential Growth and the Psychological Magnitude of Numbers’, in WEGENER, B. (ed.) Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement (Hillsdale: Earlbaum, 1982) 183–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEGENER, B., Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement (Hillsdale: Earlbaum, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Willem E. Saris and Irmtraud N. Gallhofer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saris, W.E. (1988). Individual Response Functions and Correlations between Judgements. In: Saris, W.E., Gallhofer, I.N. (eds) Sociometric Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19051-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics