Skip to main content

British Policy in Ireland, 1906–1921

  • Chapter
The Revolution in Ireland, 1879–1923

Part of the book series: Problems in Focus Series ((PFS))

Abstract

IN the time-hallowed nationalist characterisation, the British government of Ireland was despotic and cruel, systematically extirpating Irish cultural and economic life, and ruling through a sequence of repressive laws and ameliorative measures which were at best piecemeal and inadequate, at worst framed to delude and divide. This alternation of ‘coercion and conciliation’ persisted into the final years of the Union. During this phase, in the nationalist view, Liberal statesmen perpetrated the ultimate betrayal of Irish nationality — the partition of Ireland.1 These grave charges are answered from the Unionist side by their polar opposites: that Liberal governments failed in their elementary duties to suppress crime and enforce the law, surrendered to nationalist demands, betrayed and destroyed the United Kingdom.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Cf. P. S. O’Hegarty, A History of Ireland Under the Union (1952);

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Macardle, The Irish Republic 1911–1925 (1937);

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Gwynn, The History of Partition 1912–1925 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. W. A. Phillips, The Revolution in Ireland 1906–1923 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. W. Gutzke, ‘Rosebery and Ireland, 1898–1903: a Reappraisal’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, LIII, no. 127 (1980) p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parliamentary Debates, 4th series, 174, col. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.B. A Life of Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman (1973) p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacDonnell to Bryce, 15 May 1906 (Bryce MSS, NLI, Dublin).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. C. Hepburn, ‘The Irish Council Bill and the Fall of Sir Antony MacDonnell, 1906–7’, IHS, XVII (1971) 474.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bryce to MacDonnell, 13 August 1906 (MacDonnell MSS, Bodleian Library, Oxford). Hepburn, ‘Irish Council Bill’, p. 475.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cabinet Memorandum by Chief Secretary for Ireland, 5 March 1907 (PRO, CAB.37 87 26).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dillon to Morley, 19 December 1906. F. S. L. Lyons, John Dillon. A Biography (1968) p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E.g. F. S. L. Lyons, Ireland Since the Famine (1971) p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The most detailed modern critique is in P. Jalland, The Liberals and Ireland: The Ulster Question in British Politics to 1914 (Brighton, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Fanning, ‘The Irish Policy of Asquith’s Government and the Cabinet Crisis of 1910’, in A. Cosgrove and D. McCartney (eds), Studies in Irish History Presented to R. Dudley Edwards (Dublin, 1979) pp. 279–303.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Birrell to Churchill, 26 August 1911 (Verney MSS, cited by Jalland, Liberals and Ireland, p. 59).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Koss, Asquith (1976) pp. 134–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. S. Churchill, The World Crisis, vol. I (1923) p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dillon to T. P. O’Connor, 2 October 1913 (Dillon MSS, Trinity College, Dublin). M. Laffan, The Partition of Ireland 1911–1925 (Dublin, 1983) p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Law to Lord Lansdowne, 8 October 1913 (Bonar Law MSS 33/5/68, House of Lords Record Office). D. G. Boyce, ‘British Conservative Opinion, the Ulster question, and the partition of Ireland, 1912–21’, IHS, XVII (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Jenkins, Asquith (1964) pp. 281–2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a further exploration of the ‘British way’ in civil crisis politics, see C. Townshend, Britain’s Civil Wars. Counterinsurgency in the Twentieth Century (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cabinet Memorandum by Attorney General, ‘Power to Prevent Importation of Arms, &c, into Ulster’, 27 November 1913 (CAB.37 117 f. 81).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. and E. Brock (eds), H. H. Asquith, Letters to Venetia Stanley (Oxford, 1982) no. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Birrell to Nathan, 26 July 1914, and notes on Inquiry, in Ross file (Balfour MSS, British Library Add. MS 49821).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Asquith to Venetia Stanley, 24 July 1914. Letters, no. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. O Broin, Dublin Castle and the 1916 Rising (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Townshend, Political Violence in Ireland (Oxford, 1983) pp. 303–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dillon to Lloyd George, 11 June 1916 (Lloyd George MSS, House of Lords Record Office D/14/2/35).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. B. McDowell, The Irish Convention 1917–18 (1970) p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. G. Boyce and C. Hazlehurst, ‘The unknown Chief Secretary: H. E. Duke and Ireland, 1916–18’, IHS, xx (1977);

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lyons, Ireland Since the Famine, p. 386;

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Fitzpatrick, Politics and Irish Life 1913–1921 (Dublin, 1977) p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Townshend, The British Campaign in Ireland 1919–1921: the development of political and military policies (Oxford, 1975) p. 9;

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Holmes, The Little Field-Marshal. Sir John French (1981) pp. 338–53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Townshend, British Campaign, pp. 43–6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. For the evolution of British opinion see D. G. Boyce, Englishmen and Irish Troubles. British Public Opinion and the Making of Irish Policy 1918–22 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cabinet Memorandum by First Lord of the Admiralty, 24 September 1919 (G.T.8215, CAB.24 89).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Earl of Birkenhead, House of Lords 21 June 1921. 45 HL Deb., 5s, col. 690.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Townshend, British Campaign, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  41. N. Mansergh, ‘The Government of Ireland Act, 1920: Its Origins and Purposes. The Working of the “Official” Mind’, Historical Studies (1971) ed. J. G. Barry (Belfast, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  42. C. Townshend, ‘The Irish Insurgency 1918–1921: the Military Problem’, in R. Haycock (ed.), Regular Armies and Insurgency (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Macready to Sir Henry Wilson, 28 September 1920 (Anderson MSS, PRO C.O.904 188).

    Google Scholar 

  44. The case of the Boer leaders, pre-eminently Jan Smuts, offered an obvious precedent. (See, e.g. ‘Ireland’, The Round Table, No. 43, June 1921, p. 516.) But the British, however great their hostility towards the bittereinders, had to concede that their struggle originated as a lawful international war.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

D. G. Boyce

Copyright information

© 1988 Charles Townshend

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Townshend, C. (1988). British Policy in Ireland, 1906–1921. In: Boyce, D.G. (eds) The Revolution in Ireland, 1879–1923. Problems in Focus Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18985-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18985-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-40389-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18985-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics