Abstract
The matter of Othello’s competence has been at the centre of many long-standing discussions of his character.1 To some critics he is above all the ‘noble Moor’, grand, dark, mysterious.2 Other critics, usually reluctant to declare their outright hostility to him are, nevertheless, aware of a kind of failure of imagination and intelligence. Bradley himself noted, as A. D. Nuttall reminds us, that ‘if the heroes of Hamlet and Othello change places, each play ends very quickly. Hamlet would see through Iago in the first five minutes and be parodying him in the next’.3 William Empson noted that it is reasonable to complain that Othello was stupid to be deceived,4 and more recently, Michael Long has alluded to the question of Othello’s failure of comprehension in remarking the ‘pained irritation’ which is a strong component of our feelings at many points in the play.5 In referring to Othello’s incompetence I do not use the word to suggest any moral or, for that matter, intellectual weakness in Othello; rather I am referring to a reason for his vulnerability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See E. A. J. Honnigman, Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies: the Dramatist’s Manipulation of Response (London: Macmillan, 1976) pp. 77–100.
In particular, see Helen Gardner, ‘The Noble Moor’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 41 (1955) pp. 189–205.
A. D. Nuttall, A New Mimesis: Shakespeare and the Representation of Reality (London and New York: Methuen, 1983) p. 134.
William Empson, The Structure of Complex Words (London: Chatto & Windus, 1951) p. 227.
Michael Long, The Unnatural Scene: a Study in Shakespearean Tragedy (London: Methuen, 1976) p. 43.
Catherine Shaw, ’ “Dangerous Conceits Are in Their Natures Poisons”: The Language of Othello’,University of Toronto Quarterly, XLIX, 4 (Summer 1980) 316.
T. S. Eliot, Selected Essays (London: Faber & Faber, 1932) p. 130.
F. R. Leavis, The Common Pursuit (Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin, 1962) p. 142.
Jane Adamson, Othello as Tragedy: Some Problem of Judgement and Feeling (Cambridge University Press, 1980) p. 28.
Derick C. Marsh, Passion Lends Them Power: a Study of Shakespeare’s Love Tragedies (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1976) p. 98.
Barbara Everett, ’ “Spanish” Othello: the Making of Shakespeare’s Moor’, Shakespeare Survey 35 (Cambridge University Press, 1982) p. 110.
Reuben Brower, Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Greco-Roman Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971) p. 4.
Howard Felperin, Shakespearean Representation: Mimesis and Modernity in Elizabethan Tragedy (Princeton University Press, 1977) p. 79.
R. A. Foakes,’Iago, Othello and the Critics’, De Shakespeare a T. S. Eliot: Melanges offerts a Henri Fluchere Etudes Anglais 63 (Paris: Didier, 1976) p. 65.
Lawrence Danson, Tragic Alphabet: Shakespeare’s Drama of Language (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1974) p. 120.
G. Wilson Knight, ‘The Othello Music’, The Wheel of Fire (London,Faber & Faber, 1949).
Brian Vickers, ‘Shakespeare’s Hypocrites’, Daedalus, 108 (1979) 71.
See Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel (University of California Press, 1967) pp. 9–35.
Leslie Fiedler has pointed to the comic characteristics of the first scene in The Stranger in Shakespeare (London: Croom Helm, 1972) p. 139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Derek Cohen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, D. (1988). Modes of Story-Telling in Othello. In: Shakespearean Motives. Contemporary Interpretations of Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18967-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18967-0_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18969-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18967-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)