Skip to main content

Philosophies of Social Science: The Old and the New

  • Chapter
New Philosophies of Social Science

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Theory

  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

As I said in the introduction, I do not intend in this book to add to the existing literature on positivist philosophies of science. We need, however, to look at them briefly in order to set the scene for the growth of the hermeneutic, critical and realist alternatives. One of the best recent books on positivism distinguishes no fewer than twelve senses of the term.1 For present purposes, however, we can get by with three variants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Halfpenny, Positivism and Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. T. Buckle, History of Civilisation in England, vol. 1, ch. 1 (London: 1899) (1st edn 1857).

    Google Scholar 

  3. William Outhwaite, Understanding Social Life, 2nd edn (Lewes: Jean Stroud, 1986) ch. 2 and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Outhwaite, ‘Laws and Explanations in Sociology’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Otto Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. A typical example is Richard Rudner, The Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1959), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. G. Hempel, ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, Journal of Philosophy vol. 39, 1942, pp. 35–48; reprinted in P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History (New York: Free Press, 1959), pp. 344–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hempel, ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, in Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History, p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., pp. 349 f.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Scriven, ‘Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations’, p. 448, in Gardiner, Theories of History, pp. 443–75.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 454.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edmund Mokrzycki, Philosophy of Science and Sociology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See William Outhwaite, Concept Formation in Social Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), especially p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin Hollis and Edward Nell, Rational Economic Man (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Outhwaite, Concept Formation in Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alfred Schutz, ‘Choice and the Social Sciences’, in L. Embree (ed.), Life World and Consciousness (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972), especially p. 583. Cf. Outhwaite, Concept Formation, p. 65; Richard Grathoff (ed.), The Theory of Social Action (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peter Winch: The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karl-Otto Apel, A nalytic Philosophy of Language and the Geisteswissenschaften (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1967), p. 2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. See John Thompson, Critical Hermeneutics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests (London: Heinemann, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Adorno et al., The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1976); Anthony Giddens (ed.), Positivism and Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alisdair MacIntyre, The Unconscious. A Conceptual Analysis (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karl Popper, ‘Normal Science and its Dangers’, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mary Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1963); The Structure of Scientific Inference (London: Macmillan, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Harré and E. H. Madden, Causal Powers (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 William Outhwaite

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Outhwaite, W. (1987). Philosophies of Social Science: The Old and the New. In: New Philosophies of Social Science. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18946-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics