Skip to main content

From Description to Prescription: Measurements for Management

  • Chapter
Horizons in Physical Geography

Part of the book series: Horizons in Geography ((HOGE))

  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

In consolidating the management orientation of many aspects of physical geography noted in previous chapters, we can hardly do better than to note that in the first edition of Progress in Physical Geography in 1977, R. P. Moss offered a methodological structure for the subject as a means of distinguishing ‘between good and bad geography’. Possibly the biggest change in our subject since then is that we feel less need to judge our work by the strictures of epistemology, the theory of knowledge and its acquisition. ‘Never mind the quality, feel the weight’ might be the new slogan for some, especially those who, like the author, have had to leave the world of induction and deduction for the world of production. Even if we do not actually apply the weight criterion to our work, the age of declining national wealth and financial cutbacks has promoted others who use it to sit in judgement on our efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • A starting point is a paper which summarises very succinctly the various routes to the acquisition and use of knowledge. It is a good guide to discipline even if, as with a parent’s strictures, you go off and ignore it later!

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R. P. (1977) ‘Deductive strategies in geographical generalization’, Progress in Physical Geography, vol. 1, pp. 23–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The argument is taken further by the next two references. The first is an analysis of the way in which science is becoming steered by society, and is therefore losing sight of some of Moss’s articles of faith. Johnston then offers another glimpse of the wicked ways of the world, and how to hold your head up as a simple scientist in a manipulative system (against which you just might feel rebellious)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan M. and Henkel M. (1983) Government and Research (London: Heinemann Educational Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R. J. (1981) ‘Applied geography, quantitative analysis and ideology’, Applied Geography, vol. 1, pp. 213–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Two views of management follow, one summarising the relationship between scientific and managerial perspectives in the natural environment within a coastal context, and the other describing governmental and private structures surrounding the practice of hydrology (and some fluvial geomorphology) in Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark M. J. (1977) ‘The relationship between coastal zone management and offshore economic development’, Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 4, pp. 431–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker D. J. and Penning-Rowsell E. C. (1980) Water planning in Britain (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finally, something to aim for! The situation in the United States is one where professional barriers are lowered to allow the wise counsel of the environmental scientist a more direct say in management. Try the exercises: would you make a consultant?

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T. and Leopold L. B. (1978) Water in Environmental Planning (San Francisco: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 Malcolm Newson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newson, M. (1987). From Description to Prescription: Measurements for Management. In: Clark, M.J., Gregory, K.J., Gurnell, A.M. (eds) Horizons in Physical Geography. Horizons in Geography. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18944-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics