Skip to main content

The Responsive Voter: Short-term Influences on Voting Behaviour

  • Chapter
Book cover Elections and Voters

Abstract

Voting is a political act. A simple point but one that can easily disappear in the welter of analyses linking electoral choice to social causes. Further, the influence of purely political factors such as party leaders and political debate is increasing as traditional class and party loyalties weaken and more votes come up for grabs. While the social structure influences levels of party support, a number of other factors produce increasing variations around these levels. These other factors are the subject of this chapter. We begin with three factors which are important between elections as well as at election time — the economy, the media and the politicians. We then turn to influences which peak at election time: these are the impact of the campaign itself and the role played by canvassing, money and opinion polls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ALEXANDER, H. (1979) Political Finance (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALT, J. (1979) The Politics of Economic Decline (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALT, J. and CHRYSTAL, K. (1983) Political Economics (Brighton: Harvester).

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUMLER, J. and McQUAIL, D. (1968) Television in Politics (London: Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOCHEL, J. and DENVER, D. (1971) ‘Canvassing, Turnout and Party Support: An Experiment’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 1, pp. 257–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOORSTIN, D. (1961) The Image: A Guide to Pseudo Events in America (New York: Athenaeum).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. (1986) ‘The Changing Nature of British Elections’, in I. Crewe and M. Harrop (eds), Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1983 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. and KING, A. (1965) The British General Election of 1964 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, H. D., JENSEN, J., LE DUC, L. and PAMMETT, J. (1979) Political Choice in Canada (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, H. D., STEWART, M. C. and ZUK, G. (1986) ‘Politics, Economics and Party Popularity in Britain 1979–83’, Electoral Studies, vol. 5, pp. 123–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. (1986) ‘Saturation Polling, the Media and the 1983 Election’, in I. Crewe and M. Harrop (eds), Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1983 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIDSON, D. (1982) ‘Candidate Evaluation: Rational Instrument or Affective Response’, Paper to Midwest Political Science Association Convention, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUNLEAVY, P. and HUSBANDS, C. (1985) British Democracy at the Crossroads (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELDERSVELD, S. and DODGE, R. (1954) ‘Personal Contact or Mail Propaganda? An Experiment in Voter Turnout and Attitude Change’, in D. Katz (ed.), Public Opinion and Propaganda (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • EYAL, G. (1981) ‘The Role of Newspapers and Television in Agenda-setting’, in G. Wilhoit and H. de Bock (eds), Mass Communications Review Yearbook: Volume II (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • FELDMAN, S. (1984) ‘Economic Self-Interest and the Vote’, Political Behaviour, vol. 6, pp. 229–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLASGOW UNIVERSITY MEDIA GROUP (1980) More Bad News (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODHART, C. and BHANSALI, R. (1970) ‘Political Economy’, Political Studies, vol. 18, pp. 43–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOSNELL, H. (1927) Getting Out the Vote: an Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • JACOBSON, G. (1980) Money in Congressional Elections (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAVANAGH, D. (1981) ‘Public Opinion Polls’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC.: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • KINDER, D. (1983) ‘Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion’, in A. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: the State of the Discipline (Washington, DC.: American Political Science Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLAPPER, J. (1960) The Effects of Mass Communication (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLINGEMANN, H. D. and TAYLOR, C. L. (1978) ‘Partisanship, Candidates and Issues: Attitudinal Components of the Vote in West German Federal Elections’’, in M. Kaase and K. von Beyme (eds), Elections and Parties (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • KRAMER, G. (1971) ‘Short Run Fluctuations in US Voting Behaviour 1896–1964’, American Political Science Review, vol. 65, pp. 131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQUAIL, D. and WINDAHL, S. (1981) Communication Models (Harlow, Essex: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • MANN, T. (1979) Unsafe at Any Margin (Washington, DC.: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARKUS, G. (1982) ‘Political Attitudes During an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study’, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, pp. 538–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARKUS, G. B. and CONVERSE, P. E. (1979) ‘A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice’, American Political Science Review, vol. 73, pp. 1055–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARSH, C. (1982) The Survey Method: the Contribution of Surveys to Sociological Explanation (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, R., BOSITIS, D. and BAER, D. (1980) ‘Stimulating Voter Turnout in a Primary’, International Political Science Review, vol. 2, pp. 445–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. and MACKIE, M. (1973) ‘The Electoral Cycle and the Asymmetry of Government and Opposition Popularity: an Alternative Model of the Relationship between Economic Conditions and Popularity’, Political Studies, vol. 21, pp. 263–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOELLE-NEUMANN, E. (1974) ‘The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion’, Journal of Communication, vol. 24, pp. 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PALDAM, M. (1981) ‘A Preliminary Survey of the Theories and Findings on Vote and Popularity Functions’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 9, pp. 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PALTIEL, K. (1981) ‘Campaign Finance: Contrasting Practices and Reforms’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • PENNIMAN, H. (1981) ‘Campaign Styles and Methods’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • PINTO-DUSCHINSKY, M. (1981) British Political Finance (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • RANNEY, A. (1984) Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROHME, N. (1985) ‘A Worldwide Overview of National Restrictions on the Conduct and Release of Public Opinion Polls’, European Research, vol. 13, pp. 30–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, R. (1967) Influencing Voters: A Study of Campaign Rationality (London: Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNEIDER, F. (1984) ‘Public Attitudes towards Economic Conditions and their Impact on Government Behaviour’, Political Behaviour, vol. 6, pp. 211–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEYMOUR-URE, C. (1974) The Political Impact of Mass Media (London: Constable).

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, A. (1981) ‘Mass Communications’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOKES, D. (1966) ‘Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency’, American Political Science Review, vol. 60, pp. 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STOKES, D. (1981) ‘What Decides Elections?’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • TANENBAUM, P. and KOSTRICH, L. (1983) Turned-on TV/Turned-off Voters (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • TRUMAN, D. (1951) ‘Some Political Variables for Election Surveys’, International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research, vol. 5, pp. 249–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUFTE, E. (1978) Political Control of the Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • WESTERSTAHL, J. and JOHANNSON, F. (1985) News Ideologies as Moulders of Domestic News (University of Goteborg: mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITELEY, P. (ed.) (1980) Models of Political Economy (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • WORCESTER, R. (1983) Political Opinion Polling: an International Review (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Martin Harrop and William L. Miller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrop, M., Miller, W.L. (1987). The Responsive Voter: Short-term Influences on Voting Behaviour. In: Elections and Voters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics