Advertisement

Political Choice: Competitive Electoral Systems

  • Martin Harrop
  • William L. Miller
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we look at electoral arrangements in countries where elections do offer a choice, and a choice that is given structure and meaning by the existence of genuinely competitive parties. Our focus here is on the liberal democracies of Western Europe, North America and parts of the British Commonwealth.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BERRINGTON, H. (1985) ‘MPs and their Constituents in Britain: the History of the Relationship’, in V. Bogdanor (ed.), Representatives of the People (Aldershot: Gower).Google Scholar
  2. BLEWETT, N. (1972) The Peers, the Parties and the People: the General Elections of 1910 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  3. BOCHEL, J. and DENVER, D. T. (1983) ‘Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 13, pp. 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BOGDANOR, V. (1983) ‘Conclusion: Electoral Systems and Party Systems’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  5. BRAMS, S. J. (1980) ‘Approval Voting in Multi-candidate Elections’, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 9, pp. 102–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BRAMS, S. J. and FISHBURN, P. C. (1978) ‘Approval Voting’, American Political Science Review, vol. 72, pp. 831–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BUTLER, D. (1981) ‘Electoral Systems’, in D. Butler et al. (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
  8. BUTLER, D. et al. (eds) (1981) Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
  9. BUTLER, D. (1983) ‘Variants of the Westminster Model’ in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  10. BUTLER, D. and CAIN, B. (1985) ‘Reapportionment: a Study in Comparative Government’, Electoral Studies, vol. 4, pp. 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CREWE, I. (1981) ‘Electoral Participation’, in D. Butler et al. (eds) Democracy At The Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
  12. CRIDDLE, B. (1984) ‘Candidates’, in D. Butler and D. Kavanagh (eds), The British General Election of 1983 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  13. DUVERGER, M. (1954, 1959) Political Parties (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
  14. EHRENHALT, A. (1983) ‘Reapportionment and Redistricting’, in T. E. Mann and N. J. Ornstein (eds), The American Elections of 1982 (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
  15. GUDGIN, G. and TAYLOR, P. J. (1979) Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organisation of Elections (London: Pion).Google Scholar
  16. JACOBSON, G. C. (1983) The Politics of Congressional Elections (Boston: Little Brown).Google Scholar
  17. LAKEMAN, E. (1970) How Democracies Vote: a Study of Majority and Proportional Systems (London: Faber).Google Scholar
  18. LAKEMAN, E. (1982) Power to Elect: the Case for Proportional Representation (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  19. LIJPHART, A. and GROFMAN, B. (eds) (1984) Choosing an Electoral System (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
  20. MCKEE, P. (1983) ‘The Republic of Ireland’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  21. MACKIE, T. T. and ROSE, R. (1986) International Almanac of Electoral History (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  22. MARSH, M. (1985) ‘The Voters Decide? Preferential Voting in European List Systems’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 13, pp. 365–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MILLER, W. L. (1978) ‘Social Class and Party Choice in England: A New Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 8, pp. 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MILLER, W. L. (1981) The End of British Politics? Scots and English Political Behaviour in the Seventies (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  25. MILLER, W. L. (1984) ‘There Was No Alternative: the British General Election of 1983’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 37, pp. 364–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NIEMI, R. G. (1984) ‘The Problem of Strategic Behaviour under Approval Voting’, American Political Science Review, vol. 78, pp. 952–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. POLSBY, N. (1983) The Consequences of Party Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  28. POMPER, G. M. (1968, 1980), Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
  29. POWELL, G. BINGHAM (1982) Contemporary Democracies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  30. RAE, D. W. (1967, 1971) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  31. RANNEY, A. (1965) Pathways to Parliament (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  32. RANNEY, A. (1981) ‘Candidate Selection’, in D. Butler et al., Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
  33. RIKER, W. (1982) ‘The Two-party System and Duverger’s Law’, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, pp. 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ROKKAN, S. (1968) ‘Electoral Systems’, in D. L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 5 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  35. ROKKAN, S. (1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).Google Scholar
  36. ROSE, R. (1983) ‘Elections and Electoral Systems: Choices and Alternatives’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  37. SARLVIK, B. (1983) ‘Scandinavia’, in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds), Democracy and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  38. SHAMIR, M. (1985) ‘Changes in Electoral Systems as Interventions: Another Test of Duverger’s Hypothesis’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 13, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. TODD, J. E. and DODD, P. A. (1982) The Electoral Registration Process in the United Kingdom (London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys).Google Scholar
  40. WALLER, R. J. (1983) ‘The 1983 Boundary Commission: Policies and Effects’, Electoral Studies, vol. 2, pp. 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Harrop and William L. Miller 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Harrop
  • William L. Miller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations