Skip to main content

Conflicts, Arms Races and War: A Synthetic Approach

  • Chapter
Peace, Defence and Economic Analysis

Abstract

This chapter elaborates basic elements for an integrated formal approach to conflicts, arms races, and war in an attempt to remedy the inadequacies we see in similar theoretical efforts. Starting from a rational actor perspective in international politics, the paper presents three interconnected models of arms races or resource allocation processes, diplomatic conflict and war initiation by nations that are based upon either general optimising principles through time or differential game theoretic considerations. All these principles are defined as adjustments between actual and target values of key variables of resources devoted to defence, diplomatic conflictual efforts, and evaluations of each side’s deterrent capabilities by the other. In addition, time constraints play a crucial role in the representation of the war initiation submodel. An analysis of these three interconnected formulations shows that our conception can account for several types of war initiation. On the one hand, we can emphasise a situation that we label the paradox of the weak where the nation with the least effective deterrent has an incentive to attack first. On the other hand, our model can also represent more classical types of confrontations where either deterrence works or where the strong attacks the weak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Allan, P., Crisis Bargaining and the Arms Race (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Intriligator, M. D. and Brito, D. L., ‘Heuristic Decision Rules, The Dynamics of the Arms Race, and War Initiation’, In U. Luterbacher and M. D. Ward (eds), Dynamic Approaches to International Conflict (Boulder, Colorado: Rienner, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brito, D. L. and Intriligator, M. D., ‘Conflict, War and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review, vol. 79(2) December 1985, pp. 943–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. For a useful survey of the historical evidence, see Ruloff, D., Wie Kriege beginnen, (Munich: Beck, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joll, J., The Origins of the First World War (London and New York: Longman, 1984). p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bueno de Mesquita, B., The War Trap (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isaacs, R., Differential Games (New York: Wiley, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lambelet, J. C. and Luterbacher, U., ‘Dynamics of Arms Races: Mutual Stimulation vs Self-Stimulation’, Journal of Peace Science, 1979, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lambelet, J. C. (1984), ‘Arms Races as Good Things?’; (see note 2); also available (in a more complete version) as Cahier de recherches economiques 8501, Department d’econometrie et d’économie politique (DEEP), University of Lausanne, Switzerland, January 1985, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer, T. F., ‘Images of the Enemy and the Initiation of Nuclear War’ (Boulder, Colorado: Department of Sociology and Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1985) mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basically, armbp is a measure of B’s ‘permanent’ defence effort as seen by A, in the sense of Milton Friedman’s permanent income hypothesis. This means that our construction eschews the possibility that expectations are formed rationally (in the sense which ‘rational expectations’ have in economics). This is not to say that the rational expectations hypothesis has no place in the analysis of arms races. Actually, one of us has shown that, in the 1905–14 Anglo-German naval race, the German side (but not the English side) behaved in a way which is strikingly consistent with the rational expectations hypothesis — see: Lambelet, J. C., ‘The Anglo-German Dreadnought Race, 1905–1914’, Papers of the Peace Science Society (International) vol. 22, 1974, pp. 1–45; ‘A Numerical Model of the Anglo-German Dreadnought Race’, Papers of the Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24, 1975, pp. 29–48; ‘A Complementary Analysis of the Anglo-German Dreadnought Race, 1905–1916’, Papers of the Peace Science Society (International) 1976, pp. 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See: Davis, H. Introduction to Non Linear Differential and Integral Equations (New York: Dover, 1962) p. 449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lambelet, JC., Luterbacher, U. (1987). Conflicts, Arms Races and War: A Synthetic Approach. In: Schmidt, C., Blackaby, F. (eds) Peace, Defence and Economic Analysis. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18898-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics