Skip to main content

Problems, Prospects and the Feminist Future

  • Chapter
American Women Since 1945

Part of the book series: The Contemporary United States

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

The Women’s Movement in the United States appears to be declining in numbers and political influence while, at the same time, becoming part of an international movement with expanded, less gender-specific programmes. In publications, conferences, demonstrations and peace camps, women are sharing new visions for achieving global security without military conflict and nuclear threats. They are creating new perspectives on international development which not only include and benefit women, but also avoid cultural disruption and environmental devastation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Carol Virginia Pohli, ‘Church Closets and Back Doors: A Feminist View of Moral Majority Women’, Feminist Studies, IX, 3 (Fall 1983), 549–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Betty Friedan, The Second Stage (New York: Summit/Simon & Schuster, 1981), p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Judith Stacey, ‘The New Conservative Feminism’, Feminist Studies, IX, 3 (Fall 1983), 576–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharon Thompson, ‘Search for Tomorrow: On Feminism and the Reconstruction of Teen Romance’, in Carole S. Vance (ed.), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (Boston and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), pp. 359, 354–5, 360, 376.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charlotte Bunch, Bringing the Global Home: Feminism in the ’80sBook III (Denver, Colorado: Antelope Publications, 1985), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zillah R. Eisenstein, Feminism and Sexual Equality: Crisis in Liberal America (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1984), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cited in John B. Judis, ‘Whose Gender Gap Is It, Anyway?’ and Zillah Eisenstein, ‘Contradictions Inevitable as Women Become Political Force’, In These Times, VIII, 27 (13–26 June 1984), 23 and 25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barbara Ehrenreich, ‘When Will American Feminism Catch Up with Its Potential Constituency?’ In These Times, VIII, 27 (13–26 June 1984), 9–10; Eisenstein, Feminism and Sexual Equality, p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis Altman provides this definition of Reaganism in his excellent study AIDS in the Mind of America (Garden City, New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1986), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Diana E. H. Russell and Nicole Van de Ven, Crimes Against Women: Proceedings of the International Tribunal (Millbrae, California: Les Femmes, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholas Freudenberg and Ellen Zaltzberg, ‘From Grassroots Activism to Political Power: Women Organizing Against Environmental Hazards’, in Wendy Chavkin, MD (ed.), Double Exposure: Women’s Health Hazards on the Job and at Home (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1984), p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Starhawk [Miriam Simos], Dreaming the Dark: Magic, Sex & Politics (Boston: Beacon Press, 1982), pp. 216 and 174.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helen I. Safa, ‘Runaway Shops and Female Employment: The Search for Cheap Labor’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, VII, 2 (Winter 1981), 432–3 and 425.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lourdes Arizpe and Josefina Aranda, ‘The “Comparative Advantages” of Women’s Disadvantages: Women Workers in the Strawberry Export Agribusiness in Mexico’, Signs, VII, 2 (Winter 1981), 470.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aline K. Wong, ‘Planned Development, Social Stratification, and the Sexual Division of Labor in Singapore’, Signs, VII, 2 (Winter 1981), 452.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barbara Ehrenreich and Deirdre English, For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts’ Advice to Women (Garden City, New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1978), p. 292. Emphasis in the original.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sheila Tobias, ‘Toward a Feminist Analysis of the Defense Budget’, Frontiers: a journal of women studies, VIII, 2 (1985), 65–8; also, a later version of this article in Plowshare Press, X, 3 (Summer 1985), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quoted in Jan Buehler, ‘The Puget Sound Women’s Peace Camp: Education as an Alternative Strategy’, Frontiers, VIII, 2 (1985), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marian Anderson, ‘Military Spending Creates Few Jobs for Women’, Plowshare Press, X, 3 (Summer 1985), 1, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cynthia Enloe, Does Khaki Become You?: The Militarization of Women’s Lives (Boston: South End Press, 1983), p. 135. Originally published by Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Adrienne van Melle-Hermans and Dorothea Woods, ‘Statistical Notes’, in W. Chapkis (ed.), Loaded Questions: Women in the Military (Washington, DC and Amsterdam: Transnational Institute, 1981), p. 90; Enloe, Does Khaki Become You? p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., pp. 199, 200, 195. Emphases in the original; Katherine DeFoyd, ‘Women Face Dead End Jobs in Defense Industry’, Plowshare Press, X, 3 (Summer 1985), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin Nelson, ‘Promise Her Everything: The Nuclear Power Industry’s Agenda for Women’, Feminist Studies, X, 2 (Summer 1984), 300, 302, 307, 305, 298–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cynthia Costello and Amy Dru Stanley, ‘Report from Seneca’, Frontiers, VIII, 2 (1985), 33 and 38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Donna Warnock, ‘Patriarchy Is a Killer: What People Concerned About Peace and Justice Should Know’, in Pam McAllister (ed.), Reweaving the Web of Life: Feminism and Nonviolence (Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1982), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Linda Schott, ‘The Woman’s Peace Party and The Moral Basis for Women’s Pacifism’, Frontiers, VIII, 2 (1985), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Amy Swerdlow, ‘Ladies’ Day at the Capitol: Women Strike for Peace Versus HUAC’, Feminist Studies, VII, 3 (Fall 1982), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nancy Chodorow, The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978), pp. 93 and 167.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sara Ruddick, ‘Maternal Thinking’, Feminist Studies, VI, 2 (Summer 1980), 352.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sara Ruddick, ‘Pacifying the Forces: Drafting Women in the Interests of Peace’, Signs, VIII, 3 (Spring 1983), 482 and 484.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 39–43, 44, 160, 148.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ofer Zur, PhD, ‘Men, Women and War: The Myth of the Warrior and the Beautiful Soul’, paper presented at Self, Society and Nuclear Conflict Conference, University of California, San Francisco, 19–20 October 1985, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. O. Zur, A. Morrison and E. Zaretsky, ‘Men, Women and War: Gender Differences in Attitudes Towards War’, paper presented at the Western Psychological Association Meetings, San Jose, California, April 1985, p. 7. I wish to thank Ofer Zur for giving me reprints of and permission to quote from these papers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Rochelle Gatlin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatlin, R. (1987). Problems, Prospects and the Feminist Future. In: American Women Since 1945. The Contemporary United States. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18896-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics