Abstract
In their treatment of the matter of the transfer of German troops from East to West at the end of 1917 and the beginning of 1918, Soviet writers follow two not entirely compatible lines: on the one hand, the Bolsheviks, they say, hindered this transfer, while, on the other, in so far as it occurred, it was a Good Thing. What were the circumstances? The German High Command had at that time grave need of extra troops on the Western Front. After their losses in the Somme battle in 1916 they had been unable to launch any large-scale offensive in France, that is, on the front they knew to be the decisive one, and concentrated their efforts instead against Russia, Romania and Italy, while hoping (vainly) for big results from the U-boat campaign.1 America’s entry into the war then brought the threat that large fresh armies from across the Atlantic would soon join the tired French and British. The Bolshevik revolution and its peace initiative came at the right moment for Germany. When General Hoffmann, chief of staff of the Germans’ northern army group on the Russian front, learnt of the Bolsheviks’ request for an armistice, he telephoned the news to Ludendorff, who asked: ‘Is it possible to negotiate with these people?’ Hoffmann replied: ‘Yes, it is possible to negotiate with them. Your Excellency needs troops, and this is the quickest way to get them.’2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
General Max Hoffmann, War Diaries and Other Papers (1929), vol. 2, p. 190.
W. Steglich, Die Friedenspolitik der Mittelmächte 1917–1918, vol. I (1964), p. 248. Cf. Hoffmann, War Diaries and Other Papers, vol. 2, p. 194.
M. Middlebrook, The Kaiser’s Battle (1978), p. 63.
W. Baumgart (ed.), Von Brest-Litovsk zur deutschen Novemberrevolution (1971: the diaries of Alfons Paquet, General Wilhelm Groener and Admiral Albert Hopman), p. 433.
F. S. Oliver, The Anvil of War (1936), p. 318, n.
J. E. Valluy, La Première Guerre Mondiale (1968), vol. 2, p. 200.
F. I. Notovich, Razgrom germanskoi armii v 1918 g. (1941), p. 9.
C. N. Barclay, Armistice 1918 (1968), p. 14;
G. Brook-Shepherd, November 1918 (1981), p. 23.
Lloyd Griscom, Diplomatically Speaking (1941), pp. 398, 400. ‘The French almost decided, at one stage, to break contact with the British and pull their forces back to protect Paris’ (Middlebrook, The Kaiser’s Battle p. 346). ‘Even on the eve of the first battle of the Marne, Germany had never seemed to be so close to final victory’ (Louis Madelin, La Bataille de France [1920], p. 356). General Hoffmann noted in his diary on 17 June: ‘The position in the West is good. The French are in a complete quandary… The tone of the French newspapers is already different from what it has been in the last four years’ (Hoffmann, War Diaries and Other Papers vol. 1, p. 221).
John Terraine, Douglas Haig (1963), p. 433. To this grim mood on the British side corresponded a justified exultation among the Germans. ‘As the first offensive drove the British back upon Amiens, a wave of enthusiasm swept over Germany. The morale of the advancing army was at its height, and the ranks, stiffened by the veteran eastern troops, were confident of ultimate success’ (R. H. Lutz, The German Revolution [1922], p. 8). Herbert Sulzbach, then serving on the Western Front, wrote in his diary on 7 April 1918, after learning of the Germans’ victory in Finland: ‘We have troops all over the world! And wherever they are, they are winning!’ (With the German Guns [1973], p. 163).
Copyright information
© 1987 Brian Pearce
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pearce, B. (1987). Russia’s Defection and the Western Front. In: How Haig Saved Lenin. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18843-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18843-7_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18845-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18843-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)