Skip to main content

Comme représentant nostre propre personne’-The Regency Ordinances of Charles V as a Historical Source

  • Chapter
Politics and Society in Reformation Europe
  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

No Holy Roman emperor after him-and few before-held such extensive claims to rule as did Charles V. These claims did not represent a coherent spatial complex; they included a multitude of countries, even leaving aside the American possessions. In kind and in intensity, the emperor’s authority varied between countries as it depended upon constitutional arrangements, and on social, economic and ecclesiastical conditions. This absence of homogeneity within his dominions was one of the fundamental problems the emperor had to face, since his goals were not limited to the simple accumulation of claims to rule over countries with such diverse historical trajectories. In the emperor’s view all his domains existed to serve his goals, the foremost of which were the restoration of his Burgundian inheritance, dominance over Italy as the key to imperial hegemony in Europe, and the internal reform of the Roman Church. A task of this magnitude would raise uncommonly difficult problems of co-ordination and communication; the attempt to solve them, through appropriate institutions and procedures, constituted a fundamental aspect of the political system of Charles V.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Gerhard Oestreich, Geist und Gestalt des frühmodernen Staats (Berlin, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kraus, ‘Le développement de la puissance de l’État dans les principautés allemandes (XVIe–XVIIe siècle)’, Revue d’Histoire Diplomatique, LXXXIX (1975), pp. 298–319.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. H. Elliott, Imperial Spain 1469–1716 (London, 1963), pp. 132–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Jover Zamora, Carlos V y los Españoles (Madrid, 1963), pp. 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Walther, Die Anfänge Karls V. (Leipzig, 1911), pp. 150ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. P. Gachard, Retraite et mort de Charles-Quint au Monastère de Yuste (Brussels, 1854), pp. 342–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Headley, The Emperor and his Chancellor (Cambridge, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinz Angermeier, ‘Die Reichsregimenter und ihre Staatsidee’, Historische Zeitschrift, CCXI (1970), pp. 265–315.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrich Lutz, Reformation und Gegenreformation, 2nd edn (Munich, 1982), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chr. Thomas, ‘“Moderación del poder.” Zur Entstehunβ der geheimen Vollmacht für Ferdinand I. 1531’, Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs, XXVII (1974), pp. 101–40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Fernández Alvarez, ‘Las instrucciones políticas de los Austrias Mayores’, Spanische Fors-chungen der Görres-Gesellschaft, XXIII (1967), pp. 171–88.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michel Baelde, De Collaterale Raden onder Karel V. en Filips II. (1531–1578) (Brussels, 1965), pp. 140–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 E. I. Kouri and Tom Scott

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rabe, H., Marzahl, P. (1987). ‘Comme représentant nostre propre personne’-The Regency Ordinances of Charles V as a Historical Source. In: Kouri, E.I., Scott, T. (eds) Politics and Society in Reformation Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18814-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18814-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18816-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18814-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics