Abstract
No Holy Roman emperor after him-and few before-held such extensive claims to rule as did Charles V. These claims did not represent a coherent spatial complex; they included a multitude of countries, even leaving aside the American possessions. In kind and in intensity, the emperor’s authority varied between countries as it depended upon constitutional arrangements, and on social, economic and ecclesiastical conditions. This absence of homogeneity within his dominions was one of the fundamental problems the emperor had to face, since his goals were not limited to the simple accumulation of claims to rule over countries with such diverse historical trajectories. In the emperor’s view all his domains existed to serve his goals, the foremost of which were the restoration of his Burgundian inheritance, dominance over Italy as the key to imperial hegemony in Europe, and the internal reform of the Roman Church. A task of this magnitude would raise uncommonly difficult problems of co-ordination and communication; the attempt to solve them, through appropriate institutions and procedures, constituted a fundamental aspect of the political system of Charles V.2
Access this chapter
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Gerhard Oestreich, Geist und Gestalt des frühmodernen Staats (Berlin, 1969).
A. Kraus, ‘Le développement de la puissance de l’État dans les principautés allemandes (XVIe–XVIIe siècle)’, Revue d’Histoire Diplomatique, LXXXIX (1975), pp. 298–319.
J. H. Elliott, Imperial Spain 1469–1716 (London, 1963), pp. 132–53.
J. M. Jover Zamora, Carlos V y los Españoles (Madrid, 1963), pp. 49–72.
A. Walther, Die Anfänge Karls V. (Leipzig, 1911), pp. 150ff.
L. P. Gachard, Retraite et mort de Charles-Quint au Monastère de Yuste (Brussels, 1854), pp. 342–52.
J. M. Headley, The Emperor and his Chancellor (Cambridge, 1983).
Heinz Angermeier, ‘Die Reichsregimenter und ihre Staatsidee’, Historische Zeitschrift, CCXI (1970), pp. 265–315.
Heinrich Lutz, Reformation und Gegenreformation, 2nd edn (Munich, 1982), p. 27.
Chr. Thomas, ‘“Moderación del poder.” Zur Entstehunβ der geheimen Vollmacht für Ferdinand I. 1531’, Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs, XXVII (1974), pp. 101–40.
M. Fernández Alvarez, ‘Las instrucciones políticas de los Austrias Mayores’, Spanische Fors-chungen der Görres-Gesellschaft, XXIII (1967), pp. 171–88.
Michel Baelde, De Collaterale Raden onder Karel V. en Filips II. (1531–1578) (Brussels, 1965), pp. 140–5.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 E. I. Kouri and Tom Scott
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rabe, H., Marzahl, P. (1987). ‘Comme représentant nostre propre personne’-The Regency Ordinances of Charles V as a Historical Source. In: Kouri, E.I., Scott, T. (eds) Politics and Society in Reformation Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18814-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18814-7_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18816-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18814-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)