Skip to main content

The Communist Parties

  • Chapter
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

One of the defining characteristics of a communist state, it was suggested in Chapter 1, is the existence of a communist or Marxist-Leninist party exercising dominant political authority within the society in question. Not all the parties we shall consider in this chapter in fact call themselves communist. The Polish party, for instance, is called the Polish United Workers’ Party, and the Albanian party is called the Party of Labour of Albania (see Table 4.1). Nor are these parties necessarily the only parties that are permitted to exist in their respective societies; almost half of them, in fact, permit more than one party to exist, with seats in the legislature and a formally independent status (see Table 3.1). In none of these states, however, is any genuinely competitive political party permitted to exist, and the non-communist parties in these countries are generally of a more or less ‘puppet’ character, contesting elections together with the communist party on the basis of a common list of candidates and with a common manifesto. The dominant role of the communist party within the political system, and within the party of its central leadership, is indeed the essential characteristic of a communist state not just to political scientists but also so far as the communist party authorities themselves are concerned; it was to resist any challenge to that role that the Soviet Union and its allies intervened in Czechoslovakia in 1968 and appeared likely to do so again in Poland in 1980–81.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • The rules or statutes of all ruling communist parties are reprinted together with brief introductions and bibliographies in Simons and White (1984). No other studies are presently available which deal with all the ruling communist parties; Eastern Europe is, however, covered in Fischer-Galati (1979), and political leadership and succession in the USSR, Eastern Europe and China is considered in McCauley and Carter (1986). Lenin’s writings on the communist party and its role include What is to be Done? (1902), which is available in many modern editions. The most useful general surveys of Leninist theory are Meyer (1957), Harding (1977) and (1981), and Lane (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • On the USSR more specifically, there are thorough studies of the CPSU in Hough and Fainsod (1979) and in Hill and Frank (1986). The Rules of the CPSU, as revised by the 27th Party Congress in 1986, are widely available in pamphlet form, together with the 1986 edition of the Party Programme. On the party’s ideological work, see White (1979, chs 4–6 and 1985). On the party’s role in economic management, which is considered further in Chapter 5, see Hough (1969) and more recently Rutland (1985). Two basic studies of party history are Schapiro (1970) and Rigby (1968), which should be supplemented by Rigby (1976). On the nomenklatura, see Harasymiw (1969) and (1984), and also Voslensky (1984). On the General Secretary and his role, see Brown (1980) and Gill (1986); on the Politburo more generally, see Löwenhardt (1982). On participation within the party, see Unger (1977–78) and (1981b), which are based upon interviews with émigrés.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the communist parties in Eastern Europe, in addition to the works mentioned at the end of Chapter 3, the following may be consulted: King (1980) on the Romanian Communist Party, Kovrig (1979) on Hungary, Suda (1980) on Czechoslovakia, de Weydenthal (1986) on Poland, and Bell (1986) on Bulgaria, all of which are volumes in the ‘Histories of Ruling Communist Parties’ series produced by the Hoover Institution. In addition, McCauley (1979) on the GDR and Prifti (1978) on Albania are thorough and well documented. Lowit (1979) provides a useful theoretical perspective; Fischer-Galati (1979), already mentioned, provides a more general account.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the Communist Party of China, Schurmann (1968) is a classic which is still essential reading. Chang (1978) is a valuable guide to policy-making. See also Teiwes (1979), which deals with the period up to the Cultural Revolution. More recent developments are considered in Saich (1984). The full text of the ‘Resolution on certain questions in the history of our party’, containing the party’s assessment of the Mao era, is in Beijing Review, no. 27 (1981). The Party Constitution of 1982 may be found in Beijing Review, no. 27 (1981), and in Simons and White (1984). A useful source on policy changes in the post-Mao era is Deng Xiaoping (1984). The current leadership as elected by the 12th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party in 1982 is examined in Bartke and Schier (1985). An excellent study of the Chinese variant of the nomenklatura system is Manion (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Stephen White, John Gardner and George Schöpflin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, S., Gardner, J., Schöpflin, G. (1987). The Communist Parties. In: Communist Political Systems. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18741-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics