Communal Land Tenure Systems and Their Role in Rural Development

  • Keith Griffin

Abstract

Dispassionate analysis of land tenure systems and their role in rural development has been hampered by ideological conflict. Political rhetoric in North America and Western Europe reflecting a general hostility towards the Soviet Union has helped to create a widely held view that communal tenure systems invariably result in stagnation of production, inefficiency of resource allocation and coercion of the peasantry. Where they survive, communal systems are thought to do so partly because of large imports of food from the West and partly because of the existence of a tiny private sector which somehow manages to flourish despite attempts by governments to suppress it.

Keywords

Europe Petroleum Income Marketing Fishing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggestions for further reading

  1. 1.
    Keith Griffin (ed.), Institutional Reform and Economic Development in the Chinese Countryside, London: Macmillan, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alec Nove, An Economic History of the USSR, Harmonds-worth: Penguin 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 10.
    Keith Griffin, The Political Economy of Agrarian Change, London: Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 12.
    Doreen Warriner, Land Reform in Principle and Practice, Oxford University Press, 1969, p. 67.Google Scholar
  5. 15.
    Lloyd G. Reynolds, Image and Reality in Economic Development, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977, p. 400.Google Scholar
  6. 30.
    Keith Griffin and Jeffrey James, The Transition to Egalitarian Development, London: Macmillan, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Keith Griffin 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Griffin
    • 1
  1. 1.Magdalen CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations