Abstract
Dispassionate analysis of land tenure systems and their role in rural development has been hampered by ideological conflict. Political rhetoric in North America and Western Europe reflecting a general hostility towards the Soviet Union has helped to create a widely held view that communal tenure systems invariably result in stagnation of production, inefficiency of resource allocation and coercion of the peasantry. Where they survive, communal systems are thought to do so partly because of large imports of food from the West and partly because of the existence of a tiny private sector which somehow manages to flourish despite attempts by governments to suppress it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Suggestions for further reading
Keith Griffin (ed.), Institutional Reform and Economic Development in the Chinese Countryside, London: Macmillan, 1984.
Alec Nove, An Economic History of the USSR, Harmonds-worth: Penguin 1969.
Keith Griffin, The Political Economy of Agrarian Change, London: Macmillan, 1979.
Doreen Warriner, Land Reform in Principle and Practice, Oxford University Press, 1969, p. 67.
Lloyd G. Reynolds, Image and Reality in Economic Development, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977, p. 400.
Keith Griffin and Jeffrey James, The Transition to Egalitarian Development, London: Macmillan, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 Keith Griffin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griffin, K. (1987). Communal Land Tenure Systems and Their Role in Rural Development. In: World Hunger and the World Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18739-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18739-3_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-41994-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18739-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)