Skip to main content
  • 125 Accesses

Abstract

In the introductory chapter we concluded that to adopt either a wholly prescriptive or a wholly descriptive perspective on strategic management was inappropriate and that the differences between these approaches would be considered in the context of particular topics. So, in a discussion of objectives we must distinguish between views about what the firm is believed to be doing, and opinions as to what firms should be doing. However, when consideration is given to various models of the firm’s objectives, which purport to be essentially descriptive in nature, a normative element can be detected. In as much as any attempt to model the objectives of the firm is motivated by a desire to demonstrate or prove a particular point of view, we should not expect to discover an ‘objective theory of objectives’! It should be no surprise that theories about objectives are inextricably linked with more widely drawn theories about the firm’s behaviour. These broader models will also be considered briefly in his chapter. First, though, we should explore whether or not an organisation can have a goal!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argenti, J. (1980) Practical Corporate Planning (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1967) The New Industrial State (London: Hamish Hamilton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R. C. (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations (Chichester: Wiley) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power In and Around Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall) pp. 246–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R. L. (1964) The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism (London: Hamish Hamilton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1970) Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View (New York: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L. R. (1969) ‘Effects of Size, Complexity and Ownership on Administrative Intensity’, Administrative Science Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildsmith, J. R. (1973) Managerial Theories of the Firm (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Cliff Bowman and David Asch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowman, C., Asch, D. (1987). Objectives. In: Strategic Management. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18702-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics