Objectives

  • Cliff Bowman
  • David Asch
Chapter

Abstract

In the introductory chapter we concluded that to adopt either a wholly prescriptive or a wholly descriptive perspective on strategic management was inappropriate and that the differences between these approaches would be considered in the context of particular topics. So, in a discussion of objectives we must distinguish between views about what the firm is believed to be doing, and opinions as to what firms should be doing. However, when consideration is given to various models of the firm’s objectives, which purport to be essentially descriptive in nature, a normative element can be detected. In as much as any attempt to model the objectives of the firm is motivated by a desire to demonstrate or prove a particular point of view, we should not expect to discover an ‘objective theory of objectives’! It should be no surprise that theories about objectives are inextricably linked with more widely drawn theories about the firm’s behaviour. These broader models will also be considered briefly in his chapter. First, though, we should explore whether or not an organisation can have a goal!

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argenti, J. (1980) Practical Corporate Planning (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  2. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  3. Galbraith, J. K. (1967) The New Industrial State (London: Hamish Hamilton).Google Scholar
  4. Katz, D. and Kahn, R. C. (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations (Chichester: Wiley) p. 101.Google Scholar
  5. Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power In and Around Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall) pp. 246–7.Google Scholar
  6. Marris, R. L. (1964) The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism (London: Hamish Hamilton).Google Scholar
  7. Perrow, C. (1970) Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View (New York: Wadsworth).Google Scholar
  8. Pondy, L. R. (1969) ‘Effects of Size, Complexity and Ownership on Administrative Intensity’, Administrative Science Quarterly.Google Scholar
  9. Wildsmith, J. R. (1973) Managerial Theories of the Firm (Oxford: Martin Robertson).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cliff Bowman and David Asch 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cliff Bowman
    • 1
  • David Asch
    • 2
  1. 1.Cranfield School of ManagementUK
  2. 2.The Open UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations