Co-leadership

Abstract

When planning a group, practitioners have a choice between solo and co-leadership. Despite its widespread prevalence, co-work is not necessarily appropriate with all groups. In groups relying primarily on discussion, one worker may be the most appropriate since members may feel outnumbered, threatened or intimidated by the presence of co-leaders. Two workers may prove too top-heavy in a small group but may be useful in activity groups in monitoring and controlling the group. However, co-workers may not prevent disruptive or destructive activity or help to control the group. Using three or more workers can create both confusion regarding the structure of and roles in leadership and a situation where leaders and members form and co-exist as sub-groups.