Abstract
The perfection of form of Emma stands as a challenge, from the beginning to the end of the novel — a work of captivating arrangement and (on the heroine’s part) brilliant incomprehension, concluding with the tonic chord of marriages that have been envisioned throughout, except by most of the principals; and ‘perfect’ is a word whose ironic fortunes trace and express the challenge throughout the novel. But more than one reader has been led astray by supposing that ‘perfect’ means perfect, without the slant of irony, especially at the end of the novel. Thus Miller: ‘The “perfect union” of Emma and Mr. Knightley virtually must end the novel; otherwise it would not be a “perfect” union. It would be brought back to the state of insufficiency and lack that has characterized the novelistic movement’ (5). But the perfection there sketched has already been eroded by what has led up to this comic moment. Historically, the book’s fine coherence places it as powerfully indicative of the era that had just drawn to a close but to which Jane Austen’s novel provides wary retrospect; the glitter is valedictory — compare Tom Jones. Tom Jones has a different kind of perfection, because its length and breadth create more space around and within it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I Emma: Perfection under Threat
Austen, Jane. Emma. 1816. The Novels of Jane Austen 4. Ed. R. W. Chapman. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1933.
Austen, Jane. Letters to Her Sister Cassandra and Others. Ed. R. W. Chapman. 2nd ed. London: Oxford UP, 1952.
Brownstein, Rachel. Becoming a Heroine. New York: Viking, 1982.
Butler, Marilyn. Jane Austen and the War of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.
Cecil, David. Poets and Storytellers. London: Constable, 1949. A reprint of the Leslie Stephen Lecture, published by the Cambridge UP in 1935.
Gillie, Christopher. A Preface to Jane Austen. London: Longman, 1974.
Miller, D. A. Narrative and Its Discontents: Problems of Closure in the Traditional Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.
Roberts, Warren. Jane Austen and the French Revolution. London: Macmillan, 1979.
Schorer, Mark. ‘Fiction and the Matrix of Analogy’. Kenyon Review 12 (1949). 539–560.
II Howards End and the Denial of Doom
Bradbury, Malcolm. ‘Howards End’. Forster: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Malcolm Bradbury. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1966. 128–43.
Forster, E. M. Aspects of the Novel (The Clark Lectures, 1927). Abinger Edition 12. Ed. Oliver Stallybrass. London: Arnold, 1974.
Forster, E. M. Howards End. 1910. Abinger Edition 4. Ed. Oliver Stallybrass. London: Arnold, 1973.
Forster, E. M. Marianne Thornton. New York: Harcourt, 1956.
Forster, E. M. ‘The Raison d’Etre of Criticism in the Arts’. 1947. In Two Cheers for Democracy. Abinger Edition 2. Ed. Oliver Stallybrass. London: Arnold, 1972, 105–18.
Forster, E. M. Selected Letters 1. Ed. Mary Lago and P. N. Furbank. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1983.
Forster, E. M. ‘What I Believe’. 1938. In Two Cheers, 65–73.
Gillie, Christopher. A Preface to Forster. London: Longman, 1983.
Leavis, F. R. The Common Pursuit. London: Chatto, 1952.
Macaulay, Rose. The Writings of E. M. Forster. London: Hogarth, 1938.
McConkey, James. The Novels of E. M. Forster. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1957.
Rosecrance, Barbara. Forster’s Narrative Vision. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982.
Stone, Wilfred. The Cave and the Mountain. London: Oxford UP, 1966.
Trilling, Lionel. E. M. Forster. London: Hogarth, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 Andrew Wright
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wright, A. (1987). The Emergent Woman. In: Fictional Discourse and Historical Space. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18564-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18564-1_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18566-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18564-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)