Skip to main content
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

It will be remembered that the Royal Commission recommended, among other things, that the Secretaries of State should be given a statutory responsibility for the efficiency of the police, but that they should not be given powers of direction over operational matters on the grounds that this would be inappropriate and that it was desirable that the police should be seen to be responsible for the enforcement of law.1 Despite this recommendation, the government did not see fit to introduce that statutory responsibility in either the Police Act 1964 or the Police (Scotland) Act 1967; most of the other recommendations in this area were accepted and introduced, with the major exception that a Chief Inspector of Constabulary for Great Britain was not appointed but a Chief Inspector for England and Wales and another for Scotland were introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See Stanley Bailey, ‘Break Up of the Mets’, Policing, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See M. Cain, ‘Police Professionalism: Its Meaning and Consequences’, Anglo-American Law Review, 1, 1972, and evidence submitted to the Royal Commission by the Inns of Court Conservative and Unionist Society.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sir David McNee, McNee’s Law (Collins, 1983), p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. T. Oliver, ‘The Office of Constable’, Criminal Law Review, 1975, June. p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cunningham, ‘Who Should Control the Police?’, Police, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Ian Oliver

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oliver, I. (1987). Central Government. In: Police, Government and Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18557-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics