Abstract
The peace movement in the United States is a fragmented one, largely based on a few long-standing organisations such as the War Resisters League, the American Friends and the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE), all pressing for different aims. These groups, however, have never attracted widespread national sympathy. The account in Chapter 7 shows that, although the international front organisations were actively involved in the protest movement against the Vietnam War, they had little success in promoting their disarmament and anti-nuclear campaigns in the United States. The vast majority of American citizens, who still believe in the United States role as the champion of democratic principles, support the policy of nuclear deterrence as the means of preserving peace. This has been the policy of successive Administrations since the announcement of the ‘Truman Doctrine’ in March 1947.* There is no significant or coordinated unilateralist opposition to it. There is however a vast range of institutes and organisations throughout the country engaged in the serious study of disarmament problems. Many of them are critical of established defence and arms control policies and aim to promote new initiatives with a view to achieving a genuine breakthrough in negotiations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Edward Kennedy and Mark Hatfield, Freeze! How You Can Help Prevent Nuclear War (Bantam Books, 1982) p. 114.
Leon Wieseltier, ‘The Great Nuclear Debate’, The New Republic, 14 February 1983.
Alexander Cockburn and James Ridgway, ‘The Freeze Movement Versus Reagan’, New Left Review, January–February 1983, p. 7.
Elaine Potter, ‘The Network that aims to stop Cruise’, Sunday Times, 6 March 1983, p. 13.
L. Bruce van Voorst ‘The Churches and Nuclear Deterrence’, Foreign Affairs, Spring 1983, p. 832.
Jim Lucky, ‘The Bishops’ Third Draft’, Catholic New York, 7 April, 1983, p. 5.
Kenneth Briggs ‘Bishops’ letter on nuclear arms is revised to “more flexible” view’, New York Times, 6 April 1983.
Albert Wohlstetter, ‘Bishops, statesmen and other strategists on the bombing of Innocents’, Commentary, June 1983.
Copyright information
© 1986 Royal United Services Institute
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rose, C. (1986). The Freeze Campaign in the United States and the Bishops’ Letter. In: Campaigns Against Western Defence. RUSI Defence Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18523-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18523-8_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-43209-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18523-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)