Skip to main content

The Freeze Campaign in the United States and the Bishops’ Letter

  • Chapter
Campaigns Against Western Defence

Part of the book series: RUSI Defence Studies Series

  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

The peace movement in the United States is a fragmented one, largely based on a few long-standing organisations such as the War Resisters League, the American Friends and the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE), all pressing for different aims. These groups, however, have never attracted widespread national sympathy. The account in Chapter 7 shows that, although the international front organisations were actively involved in the protest movement against the Vietnam War, they had little success in promoting their disarmament and anti-nuclear campaigns in the United States. The vast majority of American citizens, who still believe in the United States role as the champion of democratic principles, support the policy of nuclear deterrence as the means of preserving peace. This has been the policy of successive Administrations since the announcement of the ‘Truman Doctrine’ in March 1947.* There is no significant or coordinated unilateralist opposition to it. There is however a vast range of institutes and organisations throughout the country engaged in the serious study of disarmament problems. Many of them are critical of established defence and arms control policies and aim to promote new initiatives with a view to achieving a genuine breakthrough in negotiations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Edward Kennedy and Mark Hatfield, Freeze! How You Can Help Prevent Nuclear War (Bantam Books, 1982) p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leon Wieseltier, ‘The Great Nuclear Debate’, The New Republic, 14 February 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander Cockburn and James Ridgway, ‘The Freeze Movement Versus Reagan’, New Left Review, January–February 1983, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elaine Potter, ‘The Network that aims to stop Cruise’, Sunday Times, 6 March 1983, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Bruce van Voorst ‘The Churches and Nuclear Deterrence’, Foreign Affairs, Spring 1983, p. 832.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jim Lucky, ‘The Bishops’ Third Draft’, Catholic New York, 7 April, 1983, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kenneth Briggs ‘Bishops’ letter on nuclear arms is revised to “more flexible” view’, New York Times, 6 April 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albert Wohlstetter, ‘Bishops, statesmen and other strategists on the bombing of Innocents’, Commentary, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Royal United Services Institute

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, C. (1986). The Freeze Campaign in the United States and the Bishops’ Letter. In: Campaigns Against Western Defence. RUSI Defence Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18523-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics