Abstract
We might expect Chaucer’s sensitivity on the subject of authorial intention to be complemented by a fertile interest in the whole question of human intention. The tales do not disappoint us in this respect. To read them is to become freshly conscious how spoken words and actions constitute the public display of an individual’s entente. Few other poets have so deftly explored that process of display, or have so triumphantly mimicked the excessive sincerity projected by an insincere speaker. On occasion, also, Chaucer creates speech which presents someone in the very act of deluding himself about his motives: a good example is January’s declaration of his entente to marry [Merchant’s Tale, 1396–468] chronically confusing prudence and piety with an elderly lecher’s noxious desire to possess soft female flesh within the sanctifying institution of matrimony.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1987 Alcuin Blamires
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blamires, A. (1987). Questions of Intent. In: The Canterbury Tales. The Critics Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18503-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18503-0_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-37865-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18503-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)