Abstract
Polanyi’s work, broadly speaking, can be said to have been motivated by two basic concerns, one of which was concerned with the general problem of methodology and the other with a historical problem of political economy. Polanyi’s work was part of a wider movement once referred to as economic sociology. As Harry Pearson noted,
The impetus for the widely current efforts in the direction of an economic sociology comes from the increasing array of empirical problems met by all social scientists who must face up to economies as social systems. The problems arise in two different areas of interest; those involving premarket economies, both literate and nonliterate, and those where contemporary departures from the pattern of a self-regulating system of markets pose the problem. Attempts to deal systematically with these distinctly separate empirical problems converge on a common interest: the establishment of a generally relevant theory of economic organization and development. (TMEE, p. 307)
The methodological problem centred on the relations among economic anthropology, economic history, comparative economic systems, and the scope of economic theory in general. The historical problem of political economy was concerned with the breakdown of the international political economic system early in this century and the subsequent development of the corporate-welfare state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
2 The Methodology of Economics
Karl Marx, Grundrisse (New York: Vintage, 1973) p. 105.
Lynn White, Jr, Medieval Technology and Social Change (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964) pp. 5, 10, and 28.
See K. William Kapp, The Social Costs of Private Enterprise (New York: Schocken, 1971) pp. 255–62.
See J. Ron Stanfield, Economic Thought and Social Change (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979).
This example is taken from Adolph Lowe, On Economic Knowledge, enlarged edn (White Plains, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1977).
Lionel, Lord Robbins, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edn (New York: St. Martin’s, 1969) p. 12.
Marshall Sahlins, Stone Age Economics (Chicago: Aldine, 1972) p. 186n.
See, e. g. the review of American Historicists in Sidney Fine, Laissez Faire and the General-Welfare State (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1964) ch. VII.
Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modern World (New York: 1925)
Talcott Parsons, ‘Wants and Activities in Marshall’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 46 (Nov. 1931) p. 101.
Whitehead, Process and Reality, (New York, 1929) p. 11
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971) p. 321.
J. A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1954) pp. 473, 668, and 1171.
T. W. Hutchison, On Revolutions and Progress of Economic Knowledge (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978) p. 57.
J. M. Buchanan, ‘Public Goods and Natural Liberty’, in T. Wilson and A. Skinner (eds), The Market and the State (London: 1976) p. 271.
Allen M. Sievers, General Economics: an Introduction (New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1952) p. 273.
Adolph Lowe, Economics and Sociology (London: Allen & Unwin, 1935) pp. 19–22.
J. S. Mill, Principles of Political Economy in L. D. Abbott (ed.), Masterworks of Economics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973) pp. 163–4.
J. M. Keynes, Essays in Persuasion (New York: W. W. Norton, 1963) pp. 364–5.
William Leiss, The Limits to Satisfaction (University of Toronto Press, 1976).
Morris Bornstein, ‘An Integration’, in Alexander Erlich (ed.), Comparison of Economic Systems (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971) p. 355.
Benjamin Ward, The Socialist Economy (New York: Random House, 1967) pp. 5–6.
See the review of literature in T. W. Hutchinson, Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics (University of Chicago Press, 1977).
See Neil J. Smelser, The Sociology of Economic Life, 2nd edn. (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976) p. 36.
See the discussion in William D. Grampp, ‘Classical Economics and Its Moral Critics’, History of Political Economy, 5 (Autumn 1972) pp. 359–74.
Kenneth E. Boulding, ‘Economics as a Moral Science’, American Economic Review, 59 (Mar. 1969) pp. 1–12. The quote from Wordsworth is taken from Professor Boulding’s wise and beautiful article.
Thorstein Veblen, The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts (New York: A. M. Kelley, 1964) p. 25.
Copyright information
© 1986 J. R. Stanfield
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanfield, J.R. (1986). The Methodology of Economics. In: The Economic Thought of Karl Polanyi. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18434-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18434-7_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18436-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18434-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)