Skip to main content

Doth the Moon Shine that Night?: A Midsummer Night’s Dream

  • Chapter
Unconformities in Shakespeare’s Early Comedies
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

Among the early comedies A Midsummer Night’s Dream stands apart in its unusual smoothness of articulation. Considering the number of plot elements that go to make up the action of this play and the intricacy of their interdependence this is little short of miraculous. Some unconformities there are, but they are mainly to be found in the more atmospheric aspects of the play and do not greatly affect our sense of coherent movement and nicely dovetailed parts. The wedding of Theseus and Hippolyta, announced in the first act, is more than a framing device, since it is given as a reason both for Oberon’s and Titania’s presence in the Athens woodland and for the artisans’ efforts to present an entertainment; and since it draws together all the loving couples in a joint celebration of marriage at the end, heralding a future in which we may see all the marriages as things of ‘great constancy’. Oberon and Titania mirror Theseus and Hippolyta on the fairy level. The tragedy of Pyramus and Thisbe mirrors the comedy of Lysander and Hermia. Both the latter couples woo in secret and elope to escape the tyranny of parents. Lysander and Hermia are simply more fortunate than their counterparts, though they are haunted at the start by the fear of a tragic outcome to the course of true love.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hippolyta’s silence in the passage as it stands has been the subject of speculation, e.g. by David Marshall (‘Exchanging Visions: Reading A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, ELH 49.3 (1982) 543–75). Marshall thinks ‘we should be willing to consider Hippolyta’s fortunes as the curtain rises, in the same way that she perhaps weeps Hermia’s fortunes in the first scene’ (p.550). Actually there is not much to go on if we wish to understand Hippolyta’s character. Her comments during the mechanicals’ entertainment are for the most part unappreciative, though at one point she apparently pities Pyramus (V.i.279).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kott, Shakespeare Our Contemporary (1964) pp. 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anne Paolucci, ‘The Lost Days in A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, SQ, 28.3 (1977) 317–26;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alan W. Bellringer, ‘The Act of Change in A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, ES 64.3 (1983), [200]–217.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chastity ‘consisteth either in sincere virginitie, or in faithfull Matrimony’ — The Mothers Counsell, by M. R.; London, 1630 (quoted from Betty Travitsky, ed., The Paradise of Women, Westport, Conn., 1981, p. 66).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Kristian Smidt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smidt, K. (1986). Doth the Moon Shine that Night?: A Midsummer Night’s Dream . In: Unconformities in Shakespeare’s Early Comedies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18421-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics