Skip to main content

The Regulation of the Swedish Insurance Industry

  • Chapter
The Economics of Insurance Regulation
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

Public intervention in insurance has a long tradition in Sweden. The most important risk-sharing found in medieval times was that of fire aid (Brandstuth). Authority rested with the rural district meeting (Häradsting). From 1733 onwards, several urban mutual organisations for fire insurance were established. The first stock company was Skandia, founded in 1855. It was soon followed by others, dealing both in life, and casualty insurance, as well as in fire insurance. In the 1870s the Government began inspecting the insurance companies. Public control of the financial solidity of insurance companies was settled by law in 1903. The Private Insurance Supervisory Board (Försäkringsinspektionen) was established a year later.2

Thanks are due to Carl Martin Roos and Charles Stuart, my co-workers in a research project on the regulation of the Swedish property and liability insurance industry (see Roos et al., 1980). The project was financed by the Swedish Council for Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. I am also grateful to Gösta Bergman and to Robert Goldsmith for their helpful advice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, R. (1974) ‘Cross-Sectional Estimates of Cost Economies in Stock Property-Liability Companies’, Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 81–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. D. (1977) ‘Economies of Scale in Independent Insurance Agencies’ Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. XLIV, no. 4 (December 1977), pp. 539–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enskilda Försäkringsanstalter, (Sveriges Officiella Statistik, various years).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finsinger, J. (1983) Economic Analysis of Regulated Markets (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Försäkringsinspektionen (1954) ‘Enskilt Försäkringsväsende’, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. E. Melander and N. Schilling (1971) ‘Economies of Scale in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, no. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, I., C. H. Lyttkens and G. Skogh (1984) ‘The Excess Burden of Public Insurance’, International Review of Law and Economics, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1979), ‘Profit Regulation in Property-Liability Insurance’ Bell Journal of Economics (Spring, 10) pp. 172–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1960), Econometric Methods, (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. (1976) ‘Limited Knowledge and Insurance Protection’, Public Policy (Spring, 24) pp. 227–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., R. Ginsberg, L. Miller, P. Sagi, B. Borkan and N. Katz (1978) ‘Disaster Insurance Protection’, Public Policy Lessons (Wiley-Interscience).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, B. (1977) ‘Allmän svensk sakförsäkringsplan’, Nordisk Försäkringstidskrift, 57, pp. 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oredsson, M. (1978), ‘Tillsynen över försäkringsväsendet i Sverige’, Nordisk Försäkringstidskrift, 58, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proposition 1948:50. ‘Förslag till lag om försäkringsrörelse m.m.’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, C. M., G. Skogh and C. Stuart (1980) ‘The Swedish Property and Liability Insurance Market. An Industry Study’, Nationalekonomiska institutionen i Lund (Meddelande no. 72).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (1979) ‘On Moral Hazard and Insurance’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (Nov.) pp. 541–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogh, G. (1982a) ‘Returns to Scale in the Swedish Property-Liability Insurance Industry’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 49, pp. 218–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogh, G. (1982b) ‘Public Insurance and Accident Prevention’, International Review of Law and Economics, 2, pp. 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., B. Finschhoff, S. Lichtenstein, B. Currigan and B. Combs (1977) ‘Preference for Insuring Against Probable Small Losses; Insurance Implications’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, (June, 64) pp. 237–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, L. (ed.) (1983) Social Insurance (North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU 1968:5 ‘Koncentrationsutredningen III’.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU 1972:29 ‘Konsumentupplysning om försäkring’.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU 1977:84 ‘Konsumentförsäkringslag’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, C. (1983) ‘Pareto-Optimal Deductibles in Property and Liability Insurance: The Case of Home-owner Insurance in Sweden’, Scandinavian Actuarial Review, pp. 227–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenska Försäkringsföreningen (1982) Svensk Försäkrings Årsbok (Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1971) Principles of Econometrics (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jörg Finsinger Mark V. Pauly

Copyright information

© 1986 Jörg Finsinger and Mark V. Pauly

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skogh, G. (1986). The Regulation of the Swedish Insurance Industry. In: Finsinger, J., Pauly, M.V. (eds) The Economics of Insurance Regulation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18397-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics