Abstract
When power appeared inseparable from a figure of external transcendence, it was the other-worldly figure that ruled by the mediation of earthly representatives. These representatives were sanctioned from above by divine decree and not from below by the accord of the governed. As such, they can be considered representatives before society, and not as representatives of society. Through them the dictates of the invisible order were transcribed onto the materiality of social existence, giving it a form and consistency that was never completely its own. By linking the social order to its provenance in a divine order, these representatives, not only relieved society of its prof ance existence; their presence was considered necessary to its very ‘constitution’. In this sense it is not quite correct to call them representatives ‘before’ society; for this suggests that society could appear as a separate entity, the origin and carrier of its own order. On the contrary, society appeared to be totally dependent for its existence, and for the form of that existence, on the position of power in both its immediate and mediated forms. This, to be sure, is another way of saying that society could not be represented, though here one might consider representation in its political as well as its more general sense.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Reinhard Bendix, Kings or People, Powerand the Mandate to Rule (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1978) pp. 327–30.
Denis Richet, La France moderne: L’Esprit des institutions (Paris: Flammarion, 1973).
Jean Egret, La pré-révolution française, 1787–8 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962).
Ernest H. Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies: a Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton University Press, 1957).
(Bénigne-Victor-Aimé Noillac (Restif de la Bretonne?), Le coup de gràce. Quéri-monies aux Etats-généraux (Paris, 1789) p. 16.)
Jürgen Habermas, L’Escape public: Archéologie de la publicité comme dimension constitutive de la société bourgeoise (Paris: Payot, 1978) p. 19ff.
Alfred Cobban, ‘The Parlements of France in the Eighteenth Century’, in Aspects of the French Revolution (Frogmore, St. Albans: Paladin, 1973) pp. 76–7.
Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, Essai sur les privilèges (Paris: by the Author, 1788) p. 21.
Louis-Sébastien Mercier, LAn 2440 (Paris: Editions France Adel, 1977) pp. 209–10.
Gianfranco Poggi, The Development of the Modern State: a Sociological Introduction (Stanford University Press, 1978) pp. 68–70.
George Rudé, Ideology and Popular Protest (New York: Pantheon, 1980) p. 65.
Copyright information
© 1986 Brian C. J. Singer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singer, B.C.J. (1986). The Problematization of Power. In: Society, Theory and the French Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18361-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18361-6_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18363-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18361-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)