Abstract
To anyone unacquainted with Ricardo-scholarship, it may seem odd that the writings of a man who died in 1823 should continue to be the focus for lively and sometimes acrimonious debate. Yet the fact is that Ricardo’s ‘legacy’ attracts unflagging interest (as a recently published book on the subject — Caravale (ed.) 1985 — bears witness). How can this be explained? I suggest that two factors are particularly germane: interpretative method and the evaluative location of Ricardo within some ‘stream’ of economic thought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashley, W. J. ‘The Rehabilitation of Ricardo’, Economic Journal, vol.l (1891) pp. 474–89.
Caravale, G. A. (ed.) The Legacy of Ricardo (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985a).
Caravale, G. A. ‘Diminishing Returns and Accumulation in Ricardo’, in G. A. Caravale (ed.) The Legacy of Ricardo (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).
Caravale, G. A. and D. A. Tosato Ricardo and the Theory of Value, Distribution and Growth (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980).
Casarosa, C. ‘A New Formulation of the Ricardian System’, Oxford Economic Papers, (N.S.) vol. 30 (1978) pp. 38–63.
Casarosa, C. ‘The “New View” of the Ricardian Theory of Distribution and Growth’, in G. A. Caravale (ed.), The Legacy of Ricardo (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).
Garegnani, P. ‘Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers, (N.S.) vol. 36 (1984) pp. 291–325.
Gonner, E. C. K. ‘Ricardo and His Critics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 4 (1890) pp. 276–90.
Hicks, J. ‘The Ricardian System: A Comment’, Oxford Economic Papers, (N.S.) vol. 31 (1979) pp. 133–4.
Hicks, J. and S. Hollander ‘Mr. Ricardo and the Modems’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 91 (1977) pp. 351–69.
Hollander, S. The Economics of David Ricardo (Toronto: Heinemann, 1979).
Hollander, S. ‘On the Interpretation of Ricardian Economics: The Assumption Regarding Wages’, American Economic Review, vol. 73 (1983) pp. 314–18.
Hutchison, T. W. ‘On the Interpretation and Misinterpretation of Economists and of the History of Economic Literature’, in Gli Economisti e la Politico Economica, ed. P. Raggi. (Napoli: Edizioni Scientifíche Italiane, 1985).
Jevons, W. S. [1879] The Theory of Political Economy 4th edn, (London: Macmillan, 1970).
Marshall, A. [1920] Principles of Economics 8th edn (London: Macmillan, 1949).
Marx, K. [1862–3] Theories of Surplus Value (Part II) (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1969),
Pasinetti, L. L. ‘A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 27 (1960) pp. 78–98.
Peach, T. ‘David Ricardo’s Early Treatment of Profitability: A New Intepretation’, Economic Journal, vol. 94 (1984) pp. 733–51.
Ricardo, D. in P. Sraffa (ed.) The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo vols I-X, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951–55) with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb.
Rosselli, A ‘The Theory of the Natural Wage’, in G. A. Caravale (ed.), The Legacy of Ricardo (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).
Samuelson, P. A. ‘The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 16 (1978) pp. 1415–34.
Schumpeter, J. A. History of Economic Analysis (London: Allen & Unwin, 1954).
Sraffa, P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude To a Critique of Economic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960).
Stigler, G. J. ‘The Ricardian Theory of Value and Distribution’, Journal of Political Economy, 60 (1952): 187–207.
Stigler, G. J. ‘Review of Hollander (1979)’, Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (1981): 100–2.
Tucker, G. S. L. Progress and Profits in British Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1986 The British Association for the Advancement of Science
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peach, T. (1986). David Ricardo’s Treatment of Wages. In: Collison Black, R.D. (eds) Ideas in Economics. British Association for the Advancement of Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18343-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18343-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-40897-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18343-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)