Advertisement

Resource Flows to and from the Multilateral Financial Institutions

  • Dilip K. Das

Abstract

For the purpose of this study multilateral financial institutions (MFIs) are being defined as those institutions which include developing as well as the developed countries in their membership. These institutions have played a pivotal and growing role in the flow of financial resources to LDCs. Looking at the external financial receipts of LDCs one notices that LDCs received 9.2 per cent of their total resources through these institutions in 1970, 13.7 per cent in 1980, and 7.6 per cent in 1983. Approximately 90 per cent of the financial resources received by the MFIs came from the industrial market economies. Many of the MFIs which are now one of the important channels of providing concessional financial resources to LDCs were created in the decade of 1958–67. Prior to this the MFIs were limited essentially to the UN and its specialised agencies and the Bretton Woods institutions. The newly created institutions were of two kinds: First, two major funds were created in the framework of the existing institutions with a view to consolidating multilateral operations. These were the International Development Association (IDA) (1960) administered by the World Bank, and the UN Development Programme (1965), forged out of the Expanded Programme of Technical Assistance and the Special Fund. Second, this was also the decade marked by the establishment of three principal regional banks; namely, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1959), the African Development Bank (AfDB) (1963) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) (1966).

Keywords

Real Term United Nations Development Programme Nominal Term Asian Development Bank International Development Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Partners in Development (Commission on International Development. Chairman: Lester B. Pearson) (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1974) p. 128.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    United States Participation in the Multilateral Development Banks in the 1980s (Washington, DC: Department of Treasury, Feb 1982) pp.2–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibid., p. 55.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cf. Chapter 4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    According to the 1983 Annual Report the World Bank lent $10 330 million, which is the highest amount loaned by any donor, bilateral or multilateral.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cf. the fourth section of his chapter, ‘Interactions between the multilateral institutions and donors’.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Baer, ‘The World Bank Group and the Process of Socio-economic Development in the Third World’, World Development (June 1974) pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The World Bank Policies and Operations (Washington, DC: IBRD, June 1957).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. G. Johnson, The World Economy at the Crossroad (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965) p. 71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. R. Black, ‘Financing Economic Development’, United Nations Review, vol. 8, no. 2, 1972 p. 20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. S. Mason and R. E. Asher, The World Bank Since Bretton Woods (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1973) pp. 150–95.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    President of the IBRD between 1963 and 1965.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. S. McNamara, One Hundred Countries, Two Billion People (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1973) p. 55.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quoted by E. Reid in Strengthening the World Bank (Chicago, Ill.: The Adlai Stevenson Institute, 1973) p. 20.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNamara, op. cit. p. 115.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Policies and Operations: The World Bank Group (Washington, DC: IBRD, 1974) pp. 41–3.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Economist (16 Apr 1983) p. 14. See also The Economist, 3 Dec 1983, p. 20.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The expression ‘World Bank group’ includes the IDA and the IFC.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. S. Mason and R. E. Asher, op. cit. pp. 201–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Annual Report 1970, World Bank, pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid. p. 26.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Annual Report 1982, World Bank, p. 12.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Annual Report 1984, World Bank, p. 15.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. D. Henderson, ‘Terms and Flexibility of Bank Lending’, in J. P. Lewis and I. Kapur (eds) The World Bank Group, Multinational Aid and the 1970s (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1973).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Annual Report 1973, World Bank, p. 71.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Annual Report 1982, World Bank, pp. 52–3.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Financial Times (3 Mar 1983) p.4.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. C. Whitehead, ‘Sowing the Seeds of Prosperity’, Euromoney (Oct 1983) p. 243.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Financial Times, 4 April 1985.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Article III, section 4, clause vii.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Programme lending is a technique based on the macroeconomic gap analysis. With the help of the Chenery-Strout model it is determined what are the financial needs of an LDC to maintain a certain rate of growth. On the one hand, statistical projections are made for imports, exports, debt service, investment and other variables in the borrowing LDC. On the other hand, macroeconomic projections are made for the borrower’s capital requirements. Then the sources of finance and their volume are quantified; these sources are: trade, private investment, export credits, and bilateral and multilateral assistance. In the end the ‘gap’ between the two, that is, need and availability of financial resources is determined, it is calculated how much of this gap can be filled by the Bank.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Haq, ‘Transfer of Resources’, in J. P. Lewis and I. Kapur (eds) op. cit.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cf. note 28.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Quoted in The United States and the Multilateral Development Banks (Washington, DC: Mar 1974). Committee on Foreign Affairs, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency, US Senate, Eighty-fifth Congress, Second Session, on SR 264, International Development Association (Washington, DC: 1958).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    IDA, In Retrospect, published for the World Bank (New York, London: Oxford University Press, 1982) p. 1.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. Baer, ‘The World Bank Group and the Process of Socio-economic Development in the Third World’, op. cit.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    IDA, In Retrospect, op. cit. pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Special Report to the President and to Congress on the Proposed Replenishment of the Resources of the IDA (Oct 1973) (Washington, DC: The Committee on Banking and Currency, US Government, 1973).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cf. Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    IDA, In Retrospect, op cit. p. 21.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ibid. pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Two events which supported the IFC idea were: the Gray Report submitted to President Truman in 1950 and the Rockefeller Report, called Partners in Progress, submitted in 1951. Later on, the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve System and the Export Import Bank were to take a negative stance on it.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. L. Garner, President, International Finance Corporation, Statement at the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of IBRD (Washington, DC: 1955) p. 3.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Annual Report, IFC, 1959 (1960), p.4.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    U. Kirdar, The Structure of United Nations Economic Aid to Underdeveloped Countries (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966) pp. 176–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    E. R. Black, Address to the 19th Session of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (IFC, undated) p.6.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. C. Baker, The International Finance Corporation (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1968).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    P. Bayless, ‘Merchant Banker of the Third World’, Institutional Investor (Sep 1982) pp. 213–22.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Annual Report of the IFC, 1982, p. 16.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    P. Bayless, op. cit.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    The World Bank, IFC and IDA, prepared by the Staff of the World Bank, Apr 1962 (Washington, DC: World Bank) pp. 99–100.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Annual Report of the IFC, 1982, p.6. See also International Finance Corporation, The Banker, London, March 1985, pp. 66–7.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    L. B. Johnson, Public Papers of the President of the United States, 1965, vol. 1, (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1966) p.397.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Annual Report of the ADB, 1968.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Published in February 1969.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    ADB, Quarterly Review (Apr 1981).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    N. Peagom, ‘Guiding Asia’s Growth’, Euromoney (London: April 1984), pp.S1-S10.Google Scholar
  60. See also Gabriel Rosario, ‘Is the Asian Development Bank Lending Too Much?’, The Banker (London: April 1985), pp. 53–7.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    J. White, Regional Development Banks (London: Overseas Development Institute, 1970) pp. 110–21.Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    Annual Report of the AfDB (Abidjan: African Development Bank, 1981) p.11.Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    Ibid. pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    R. K. A. Gardiner and J. Pickett, The African Development Bank, 1964–1984 (Abidjan, Ivory Coast: African Development Bank, 1984) pp. 161–5.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    The United States and the Multilateral Development Banks (Washington, DC: Committee on Foreign Affairs, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Mar 1974) pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    Ibid. p. 19.Google Scholar
  67. 66.
    J. White, Regional Development Banks, op. cit. pp. 164–86.Google Scholar
  68. 67.
    Annual Report, IDB (Washington, DC: 1967 Inter-American Development Bank, 1968) p. 61.Google Scholar
  69. 68.
    Annual Report, IDB (Washington, DC: 1968 Inter-American Development Bank, 1969) p.3.Google Scholar
  70. 69.
    J. A. Lynn, The IDB’s First Decade and Perspectives for the Future (Punta del Este, Uruguay: Inter-American Development Bank, Round Table, Apr 1970) p. 3.Google Scholar
  71. 70.
    A. Ortiz Mena, President, IDB, Address before the Third Meeting of the United Nations (Santiago, Chile: 21 Apr 1972).Google Scholar
  72. 71.
    A. Ortiz Mena, President, IDB, Address at the Thirteenth Meeting of the Board of Governors of the IDB (Quito, Ecuador: 9 May 1972).Google Scholar
  73. 72.
    Annual Report, 1981, IDB (Washington, DC: 1982).Google Scholar
  74. 73.
    A Partnership in Action, IDB (Washington, DC: n.d.).Google Scholar
  75. 74.
    The Wall Street Journal (New York: 28 Mar 1985).Google Scholar
  76. 75.
    United States Participation in the Multilateral Development Banks in the 1980s (Washington, DC: US Treasury, 1982).Google Scholar
  77. 76.
    The International Monetary Fund: Its Financial Organization and Activities, Pamphlet Series, No. 42 (IMF, Washington, DC: 1984), p.77.Google Scholar
  78. 77.
    G. Bird, The IMF and the Developing Countries (London: Overseas Development Institute March 1981) pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  79. 78.
    J. Gold, Conditionality, Pamphlet Series, No. 31 (Washington, DC: IMF, 1979) p. 1.Google Scholar
  80. 79.
    T. Killick, IMF Stabilization Programmes (London: Overseas Development Institute Working Paper No. 6, Sep 1981).Google Scholar
  81. 80.
    Annual Report, IMF, 1965, p. 10.Google Scholar
  82. 81.
    They include measures to control some or all of the following: domestic credit expansion, government expenditure and taxation (related to money supply), foreign indebtedness, prices and wages, trade practices and exchange rate.Google Scholar
  83. 82.
    A. I. MacBean and P. N. Snowden, International Institutions in Trade and Finance (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981) pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
  84. 83.
    J. Gold, Financial Assistance by the International Monetary Fund: Law and Practice, Pamphlet Series No. 27 (Washington, DC: IMF, 1980) pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    J. de Larosière, ‘Text of an Address before the Economic and Social Council of the UN’; in IMF Survey (7 July 1980).Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    G. Bird, The IMF and the Developing Countries, op. cit. p. 12.Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    C. Payer, The Debt Trap: The IMF and the Third World (Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin Books, 1974).Google Scholar
  88. 87.
    G. Bird, The International Monetary System and the Less Developed Countries (London: Macmillan Press, 1978) p. 17.Google Scholar
  89. 88.
    G. Bird, ibid.Google Scholar
  90. 89.
    It was established by Resolution 2029 (xx), adopted by the UN General Assembly on 22 November 1965, as from 1 January 1966.Google Scholar
  91. 90.
    The following organisations serve as participating and executing agencies of the UNDP: UN, ILO, FAO, UNESCO, WHO, IBRD, ICAO, ITU, WMO, IAEA, UPU, IMCO, UNIDO, UNCTAD, IDB and UNICEF.Google Scholar
  92. 91.
    B. Mores, UNDP Progress Report 1978 (New York: UN Apr 1979).Google Scholar
  93. 92.
    V. Duchworth-Baker, Breakthrough to Tomorrow (New York: UN Centre for Economic and Social Information, 1970) pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  94. 93.
    A Report on Growth in the World-wide Work of the UNDP, II.D.ii (New York: UN 1968) p.15.Google Scholar
  95. 94.
    A. Robinson, Future Tasks for UNDP (London: International Economic Association, 1977) pp.31–6.Google Scholar
  96. 95.
    Development Co-operation, 1982 Review (Paris: OECD, 1983) pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
  97. 96.
    ‘Pledges Down — Assistance Plans Cut’, Development in Action (New York: UNDP, 1983) (Oct–Dec).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dilip K. Das 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dilip K. Das

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations