Skip to main content

Pride and Prejudice: Informal Arguments

  • Chapter
Jane Austen: Six Novels and their Methods
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

Pride and Prejudice is closer to Sense and Sensibility than to Northanger Abbey in its methods, but it is still radically unlike either. It does not present us with competing narrative structures, nor does it explore some of the formal links between ideas in the abstract and ideas in practice. To connect Darcy simply with ‘pride’ or Elizabeth with ‘prejudice’ is to be very reductive: to seek a useful antithesis or synthesis in the title is to be mistaken.

‘… but intricate characters are the most amusing. They have at least that advantage.’ (Elizabeth Bennet)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.50
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sterne, The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, ed. Petrie (1967) pp. 77, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sir Walter Scott, unsigned review of Emma (1815, pp. 194–5). At least one critic has attempted a sophisticated defence of Scott’s account: see McCann (1964, pp. 73–4).

    Google Scholar 

  3. There is for example the argument that ‘marriage is not commonly unhappy, otherwise than as life is unhappy’, and mention of the ‘ancient custom of the Muscovites’ whereby couples did not meet until they were married, since courtship merely allows individuals ‘to hinder themselves from being known, and to disguise their natural temper, and real desires, in hypocritical imitation, studied compliance, and continued affectation’ — Johnson, Works, III (1969) 243–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edgeworth, The Absentee (1910 edn) p. 281;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sir Walter Scott, Waverley (1906 edn) p. 477;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wordsworth, Poetical Works, ed. Hutchinson, pp. 734–5; Coleridge, Biographia Literaria (1817), ed. Watson (1956) pp. 188–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Michael Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, M. (1986). Pride and Prejudice: Informal Arguments. In: Jane Austen: Six Novels and their Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18285-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics