Pesticides and the Politics of International Regulation

  • Robert Boardman
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


Agricultural technologies have continued to change. While a number of developments in areas of biological control and other methods for attacking agricultural pests appear to have significant potential for the future, it also seems to be the case that the more traditionally conceived chemical strategies of the last half-century will remain well into the next. These form a corner-stone of modern agribusiness practice in the developed countries. Agricultural progress in developing countries is inconceivable without them. Despite technical and practical difficulties in evaluating crop losses due to pests, and the willingness of statistics to allow themselves to be manipulated by any passing vested interest, there is clear evidence that such losses are proportionately large, would be still greater without the availability of pesticide chemicals, and will continue to constrain the rate of growth of food productivity. Regulatory dilemmas arise because of the costs associated with the widespread use of toxic chemicals in terms of human health and environmental conservation. Sporadic outbreaks of pests are also reminders of the limits to efficacy set by problems of insect resistance, or, as in the re-emergence of citrus canker in Florida in 1984, of the restricted area of protection afforded by any form of defence.


Pesticide Residue International Regulation Good Laboratory Practice Citrus Canker Regulatory Question 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Aron, The Industrial Society: Three Essays on Ideology and Development (New York: Praeger, 1967) pp. 97–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. V. Rieu (trans.), Homer. The Odyssey, (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1946) p. 115.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. Futehally, ‘Conservation in a World of Rising Expectations’, in IUCN, Proc. 11th General Assembly (IUCN, 1972) p. 250.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    G. S. Lim, K. L. Heong, and A. C. Ooi, ‘Constraints to Integrated Pest Control in Malaysia’, in Proc. Conf. on Future Trends of Integrated Pest Management, Bellagio, 1980 (Paris: IOBC, 1981) pp. 61–6.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    C. Cockerill, ‘Agricultural Pesticides: The Urgent Need for Harmonization of International Regulation’, California Western International Law Journal, vol. 9 (1979) no. 1, pp. 111–38.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    John Woodward, quoted by A. Holmes, Principles of Physical Geology, 2nd edn (London: Thomas Nelson, 1965) p. 1250.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert Boardman 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Boardman
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations