Skip to main content

The policy implications of Post Keynesian monetary theory

  • Chapter

Abstract

Any theory in reasonable contact with reality carries with it a plan for action—a policy for changing the world along better lines in keeping with its vision. When a theory is devoid of any contact with reality, it has no policy implications (action in the real world not being possible), or, alternatively, if a theory has but a tenuous contact with reality, its policy implications may be irrelevant or politically impractical. Neoclassical Keynesian theory, by virtue of its reformulation of Keynes along general equilibrium lines, has been moving along the latter trajectory. Post Keynesian theory, on the other hand, represents an attempt, still in the process of being worked out, to restore reality to economic thinking in terms of the power relationships of contemporary society. Whether it has done so effectively, or any better than neoclassical Keynesianism along politically practical lines, is left to the concluding section of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For Keynes’s earlier and even then prescient views, see Chapter 3, Part I of his Tract on Monetary Reform (London: Macmillan, 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. S. Sayers, Modern Banking, 6th ed. (London: Oxford University Press, 1964), italics supplied.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. R. C. Lewontin, “Darwin’s Revolution,” New York Review of Books, June 16, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. A. Goldenweiser, American Monetary Policy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951), pp. 32–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The standard references are: Paul Davidson, Money and the Real World, 2nd ed., (New York: Macmillan, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul Davidson and J. A. Kregel, “Keynes’s Paradigm: ATheoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis,” in Edward J. Nell, ed., Growth, Profits and Property (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. and Hyman P. Minsky, Can “It” Happen Again? (Armonk, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For an alternate view, see Stephen Rousseas, Capitalism and Catastrophe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. C. Pigou, Keynes’ General Theory: A Restrospect (London: Macmillan, 1950), p. 58, original italics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rousseas, S. (1986). The policy implications of Post Keynesian monetary theory. In: Post Keynesian Monetary Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18229-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics