Abstract
The Greeks — Greek text — cannot be interpreted, for they have no concept of interpretation. The Greeks — Greek texts — do not exist, for they have no concept of existence. The only thing which can be interpreted — the only interpretable thing — is existence. The Only thing which exists is (the act of) interpretation. Without interpretation. there is no existenc (nothing exists). Without existence, there is nothing to be interpreted (no interpretation exists). Interpretation exists only in its action — the act of interpretation. Existence is the interpretation of thought — the thought of existence. Interpretation exists as the interpretative act, while existence is existential thought. Interpretation is existence, and existence is interpretation. Interpretation and existence are distinct and separate, just as Spinoza contended that he was concerned to separate philosophy from theology. Interpretation expresses truth as its own standard, while existence involves the cause of itself as both necessary and essential. Interpretation and existence are related by the self-conscious ergo of Descartes’ cogito ergo sum: I think, therefore I am.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1986 Brayton Polka
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polka, B. (1986). The Text as Its Own Dialectical Standard of Interpretation and Existence. In: The Dialectic of Biblical Critique. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18224-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18224-4_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-18226-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18224-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)