Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 10 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in 20th Century Literature ((STCL))

Abstract

In 1949, Mark Schorer wrote that as far as Britain is concerned, ‘we must confess that, in the past fifty years, the distinguished novels have been written in the prose that risks’. Naming established writers — Conrad, Joyce, Lawrence, E. M. Forster, Virginia Woolf and Elizabeth Bowen — ‘for whom there are no American counterparts’, he concludes that ‘to these we may now probably add the name of Henry Green’.1

The truth is, these times are an absolute gift to the writer. Everything is breaking up. A seed can lodge or sprout in any crack or fissure.

(Henry Green, letter to Rosamond Lehmann, quoted in Lehmann, ‘An Absolute Gift’, The Times Literary Supplement, 6 Aug 1954)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   35.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James Hall, ‘The Fiction of Henry Green: Paradoxes of Pleasure-and-Pain’, Kenyon Review, 19 (1957) p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edward Stokes, The Novels of Henry Green (London, 1959) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henry Green, Pack my Bag (London, 1952) pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In Terry Southern, ‘Henry Green’, Writers at Work: The Paris Review Interviews, 5 (Harmondsworth 1981) p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henry Green, ‘The English Novel of the Future’, Contact, 1, no. 2 (1950) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wayne Booth, The Rhetoric of Fiction (Chicago, 1961) pp. 76, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frederick R. Karl, A Reader’s Guide to the Contemporary English Novel (London, 1963) p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, The English Novel of the Future’, Contact, 1, no. 2, p. 21. In Alan Ross, ‘Green, with Envy: Critical Reflections and an Interview’, London Magazine, 6, no. 4 (1959) 22, Green also states that his central theme is love.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Virginia Woolf, The Voyage Out (London, 1933) p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Virginia Woolf, The Waves (London, 1933) p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Virginia Woolf, Mrs Dalloway (London, 1933) pp. 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quoted from Giorgio Melchiori, The Tightrope Walkers: Studies of Mannerism in Modern English Literature (London, 1956) p. 96. My discussion of Lawrence in relation to T. S. Eliot is indebted to Melchiori.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The lines from Lawrence and Eliot are quoted ibid., pp. 97–9. The references are to the American edition of Lawrence’s New Poems (1920) and to the ending of ‘Burnt Norton’.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sergei Eisenstein, Film Form: Essays in Film Theory, ed. and tr. Jay Leyda (New York, 1968) p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Green’s images escape classification by general literary or cultural conventions. Culler suggests that ‘What is made intelligible by the conventions of genre is often less interesting than that which resists or escapes generic understanding, and so it should be no surprise that there arises, over and against the vraisemblance of genre, another level of vraisemblance whose fundamental device is to expose the artifice of generic conventions and expectations’. Due to the poetic form of Green’s sunset scene, the reader ‘must allow the dialectical opposition which the text presents to result in a synthesis at a higher level where the grounds of intelligibility are different’ — Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (London, 1975) pp. 148, 151. For a definition of ‘vraisemblance’, see n. 35.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Sergei Eisenstein, The Film Sense, ed. and tr. Jay Leyda (London, 1968) p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roland Barthes, ‘Criticism as Language’, in 20th Century Literary Criticism, ed. David Lodge (London, 1972) pp. 249–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robert Richardson, Literature and Film (Bloomington, Ind., 1969) p. 67. Richardson writes that ‘verbs are only one part of speech, to be sure, but they are crucial and one of the reasons why nearly everyone will concede the potential, if not the actual, power of the film may be its rich and varied range of ways to express action as verbs express it in writing’.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sir Colin Anderson, quoted in Rod Mengham, The Idiom of the Time: The Writings of Henry Green (Cambridge, 1982) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jonathan Culler, ‘Structuralism and Literature’ in Contemporary Approaches to English Studies, ed. Hilda Schiff (London, 1977) p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. A. Richards, Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment (London, 1954) p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mario Praz, Mnemosyne: The Parallel between Literature and the Visual Arts (London, 1970) p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jean Hagstrum, The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray (Chicago, 1958) p. xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eisenstein, Film Form, pp. 150–1. The analogy between Eisenstein’s and I. A. Richards’s statements is suggested by James Allen Pearse, ‘Montage in Modern Fiction: A Cinematographic Approach to the Analysis of Ironic Tone in Joyce Cary’s The Horse’s Mouth’ (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1973). Part of my work centres on basic montage principles also applied by Pearse to expose the irony of man’s (notably Gulley Jimson’s) struggle to impose form on an amorphous existence. However, whereas Pearse comments on the ironic irreconcilability of man and reality, Green is able to unify the two into images of sensual reciprocity. Green’s comparison of ‘tone’ with the effect produced by colour in painting suggests that Green employs montage to give his fictional world ‘a life of its own’. If a montage approach is to uncover expressive nuances in Green’s three-dimensional world, the term must be applied and adapted to the examination of its multiform conflicts and values. It must identify that conceptual operation in which symbols and images, wonder and mysticism, become meaningful.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sergei Eisenstein, Film Essays with a Lecture, ed. Jay Leyda (London, 1968) p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henry Green, Blindness, in ‘Nothing’, ‘Doting’, ‘Blindness’ (London, 1979) p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Oddvar Holmesland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmesland, O. (1986). Introduction. In: A Critical Introduction to Henry Green’s Novels. Studies in 20th Century Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18221-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics