Skip to main content

Greenham Women Against Cruise Missiles and others v. Ronald Reagan and others

  • Chapter
Nuclear Weapons, the Peace Movement and the Law

Abstract

In November 1983 a group of women from Britain walked with their lawyers into the US Federal Court in New York. They carried with them hundreds of pages of expert affidavits and legal submissions to support their claim for an injunction to stop the deployment of Cruise missiles in Britain.1 Meanwhile in Britain a Peace Camp flowered for a brief twenty-four hours outside every one of the 102 US Military Bases which had by then been identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1986 Warwick Legal Defence Trust

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hickman, J. (1986). Greenham Women Against Cruise Missiles and others v. Ronald Reagan and others. In: Dewar, J., Paliwala, A., Picciotto, S., Ruete, M. (eds) Nuclear Weapons, the Peace Movement and the Law. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18200-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics