Skip to main content

Mistakes about Conceptual Analysis

  • Chapter

Abstract

I have suggested that if we want to know — putting it brutally — what use or good philosophers are, we shall best interpret the question “What is philosophy?” along the lines of “What kind of truth, and what kind of arguments for it, do philosophers uniquely dispense?” or “How do philosophers as against, say, historians or scientists or literary critics or psychologists distinguish themselves as truth-finders?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 John Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, J. (1986). Mistakes about Conceptual Analysis. In: What Philosophy Can Do. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18171-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics