# The Theory of Technological Competition

## Abstract

It is not self-evident that economists ought to engage in the task of explaining the characteristics of technological innovations. It is even less evident that development and inventive activities are related to the structure of economic organisations. Or so it would seem from the near-complete absence of a discussion of such issues in resource- allocation theory.^{2} So would it seem, as well, from the sheer volume of effort that has been spent over the past quarter of a century in trying to demonstrate that economic forces are a prime architect of technological change.^{3} If there is a single driving force behind these empirical investigations, it is the writings of Joseph Schumpeter (most especially perhaps his *Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy*, Schumpeter, 1976). Since recent developments in the theory of technological competition have addressed a few of the empirical findings, they reflect this heritage as well.

## Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Market Structure Industrial Structure Innovative Activity Symmetric Equilibrium## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Arrow, K. J. (1962a) ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions’, in Nelson R. R. (ed.),
*The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity*, (Princeton University Press). Reprinted in N. Rosenberg,*The Economics of Technological Change*, (1971).Google Scholar - Arrow, K. J. (1962b) ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’,
*Review of Economic Studies*, vol. 29, pp. 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Barzel, Y. (1968) ‘Optimal Timing of Innovations’,
*Review of Economics and Statistics*, vol. 50, pp. 348–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bhattacharya, S. and Ritter, J. R. (1983) ‘Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure’,
*Review of Economic Studies*, vol. 50, pp. 331–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Boylan, M. G. (1977) ‘The Sources of Technological Innovations’, in Gold. B. (ed.),
*Research, Technological Change, and Economic Analysis*, (Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books)Google Scholar - Comanor, W. S. (1964) ‘Research and Competitive Product Differentiation in the Pharmaceutical Industry in the United States’,
*Economica*, vol. 31, pp. 372–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Comanor, W. S. (1965) ‘Research and Technical Change in the Pharmaceutical Industry’,
*Review of Economics and Statistics*, vol. 47, pp. 182–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Comanor, W. S. (1967) ‘Market Structure, Product Differentiation and Industrial Research’,
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, vol. 81, pp. 639–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Comanor, W. S. and Scherer, F. M. (1969) ‘Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change’,
*Journal of Political Economy*, vol. 77, pp. 392–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dasgupta, P., Heal, G. and Majumdar, M. (1977) ‘Resource Depletion and Research and Development’, in Intriligator, M. (ed.),
*Frontiers of Quantitative Economics*, vol. IIIB (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar - Dasgupta, P., Gilbert, R. and Stiglitz, J. (1982) ‘Invention and lnnovation under Alternative Market Structures: the Case of Natural Resources’,
*Review of Economic Studies*, vol. 49, pp. 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Maskin, E. (1982a) ‘The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, I: Theory’ (mimeo., London School of Economics), forthcoming,
*Review of Economic Studies.*,Google Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Maskin, E. (1982b) ‘The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, 2: Applications’, (mimeo., London School of Economics), forthcoming,
*Review of Economic Studies.*,Google Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1977) ‘Market Structure and Research and Development’, Paper presented at the World Congress of the
*International Economic Association*, on*Economic Growth and Resources*, Tokyo, Aug. (mimeo., London School of Economics).Google Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980a) ‘Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity’,
*Economic Journal*, vol. 90, pp. 266–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980b) ‘Uncertainty, Industrial Structure and the Speed of R & D’,
*Bell Journal of Economics*, Spring, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1981) ‘Entry, Innovation, Exit: Towards a Dynamic Theory of Oligopolistic Industrial Structure’,
*European Economic Review*, vol. 15, pp. 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Ushio, Y. (1981) ‘On the Rate of Convergence of Oligopoly Equilibria in Large Markets: an Example’,
*Economic Letters*, vol. 8, pp. 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Debreu, G. (1959)
*Theory of Value*, Cowles Foundation Monograph (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press).Google Scholar - Dixit, A. (1980) ‘The Role of Investment in Entry Deterrence’,
*Economic Journal*, vol. 90, pp. 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. (1979) ‘The Theory of Market Pre-emption: the Persistence of Excess Capacity and Monopoly in a Growing Spatial Market,
*Economica*, vol. 46, pp. 149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. (1980) ‘Exit Barriers and Entry Barriers to Entry’,
*Bell Journal of Economics*, vol. 11, pp. 721–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eswaran, M. and Lewis, T. R. (1982) ‘Evolution of Market Structure in a Dominant Firm Model with Exhaustible Resources’ (mimeo, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia).Google Scholar
- Fisher, F. M. and Temin, P. (1973) ‘Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?’,
*Journal of Political Economy*, vol. 81, pp. 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Freeman, C. (1965) ‘Research and Development in Electronic Capital Goods’,
*National Institute Economic Review*, vol. 34, pp. 40–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Futia, C. A. (1980) ‘Schumpeterian Competition’,
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, vol. 94, pp. 675–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Galbraith, J. K. (1974)
*Economics and the Public Purpose*, (London: André Deutsch).Google Scholar - Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D. (1982) ‘Pre-emptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly’, forthcoming,
*American Economic Review.*,Google Scholar - Grabowski, H. G. (1968) ‘The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug and Petroleum Industries’,
*Journal of Political Economy*, vol. 76, pp. 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Guesnerie, R. and Hart, O. (1981) ‘Notes on the Rate of Convergence of Cournot-Nash Equilibria ‘ (mimeo., University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
- Kaldor, N. (1961) ‘Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth’, in Lutz, F. A. and Hague, D. C. (eds),
*The Theory of Capital*, (Macmillan: London).Google Scholar - Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1972) ‘Market Structure, Rival’s Response, and the Firm’s Rate of Product Improvement’,
*Journal of Industrial Economics*, vol. 20, pp. 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1975) ‘Market Structure and Innovation: a Survey’,
*Journal of Economic Literature*, vol. 13, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar - Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1978) ‘Potential Rivalry, Monopoly Profits and the Pace of Inventive Activity’,
*Review of Economic Studies*, vol. 45, pp. 547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1982)
*Market Structure and Innovation*, (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar - Layard, R. and Walters, A. A. (1978)
*Microeconomic Theory*, (New York: McGraw-Hill)Google Scholar - Leung, H. M. (1982) ‘Industrial Structure and R & D Spill-Overs’ (mimeo., London School of Economics).Google Scholar
- Levin, R. C. (1978) ‘Technical Change, Barriers to Entry and Market Structure’,
*Economica*, vol. 45, pp. 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Levin, R. C. and Reiss, P. C. (1984), ‘Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R & D and Market Structure’, in Griliches, Z. (ed.)
*R & D Patents and Productivity*, (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar - Loury, G. (1979) ‘Market Structure and Innovation’,
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, vol. 93, pp. 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Malinvaud, E. (1972)
*Lectures on Microeconomic Theory*, (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar - Mansfield, E. (1968)
*Industrial Research and Technological Innovation — An Econometric Analysis*, (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar - Mansfield, E.
*et al.*, (1971)*Research and Innnovation in the Modern Corporation*, (New York: W. W. Norton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M. and Wagner, S. (1981) ‘Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study’,
*Economic Journal*, vol. 91, pp. 907–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nelson, R. R., Peck, M. J. and Kalachek, E. D. (1967),
*Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy*, (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Google Scholar - Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1977) ‘Dynamic Competition and Technical Progress’, in Balassa, B. and Nelson, R. R. (eds),
*Economic Progress, Private Values and Public Policy: Essays in Honour of William Fellner*, (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar - Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1978) ‘Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration under Schumpeterian Competition’,
*Bell Journal of Economics*, vol. 9 pp. 524–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nordhaus, W. D. (1969)
*Invention, Growth and Welfare*, (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).Google Scholar - Novshek, W. (1980) ‘Nash-Cournot Equilibrium with Entry’,
*Review of Economic Studies*, vol. 47, pp. 473–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pakes, A. (1984) ‘Patents, R & D and the Stock Market Rate of Return’, in Griliches, Z. (ed.)
*R & D, Patents and Productivity*, (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar - Phillips, A. (1966) ‘Patents, Potential Competition and Technical Progress’,
*American Economic Review*, vol. 56, pp. 301–10.Google Scholar - Phillips, A. (1971)
*Technology and Market Structure: a Study of the Aircraft Industry*, (Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books).Google Scholar - Reinganum, J. F. (1981a) ‘Dynamic Games of Innovation’,
*Journal of Economic Theory*, vol. 25, pp. 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Reinganum, J. (1981b) ‘On the Diffusion of New Technology: a Game Theoretic Approach’,
*Review of Economic Studies*, vol. 48, pp. 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rosenberg, N. (ed.) (1971)
*The Economics of Technological Change*, (Har- mondsworth: Penguin Modem Economic Readings).Google Scholar - Rosenberg, N. (1974) ‘Science, Innovation and Economic Growth’,
*Economic Journal*, vol. 84, pp. 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rosenberg, N. (1976)
*Perspectives in Technology*, (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schelling, T. C. (1960)
*The Strategy of Conflict*, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar - Scherer, F. M. (1967a) ‘Research and Development Resource Allocation under Rivalry’,
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, vol. 81, pp. 359–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Scherer, F. M. (1967b) ‘Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers’,
*American Economic Review*, vol. 57, pp. 524–31.Google Scholar - Schmookler, J. (1966)
*Invention and Economic Growth*, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schumpeter, J. (1939)
*Business Cycles*, (New York: McGraw-Hill)Google Scholar - Schumpeter, J. (1976)
*Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy*, 5th ed (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar - Spence, A. M. (1977) ‘Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing’,
*Bell Journal of Economics*, vol. 8, pp. 534–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Spence, A. M. (1980) ‘Notes on Advertising, Economies of Scale and Entry Barriers’,
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, vol. 94, pp. 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tandon, P. (1982) ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Welfare’ (mimeo., Department of Economics, Boston University).Google Scholar
- Varian, H. (1978)
*Microeconomic Analysis*, (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar - von Weizsäcker, C. C. (1980)
*Barriers to Entry: A Theoretical Treatment*, (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980) ‘Uncertainty, Industrial Structure and the Speed of R & D’
*Bell Journal of Economics*, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar