Eschatological Verification Reconsidered

  • John Hick


The world in which we find ourselves is religiously ambiguous. It is possible for different people (as also for the same person at different times) to experience it both religiously and non-religiously; and to hold beliefs which arise from and feed into each of these ways of experiencing. A religious person may report that in moments of prayer he or she is conscious of existing in the unseen presence of God, and is aware — sometimes at least — that his/her whole life and the entire history of the world is taking place within the ambience of the divine purpose. But on the other hand the majority of people in our modern world do not participate in that form of experience and are instead conscious of their own and others’ lives as purely natural phenomena, so that their own experience leads them at least implicitly to reject the idea of a transcendent divine presence and purpose. If they are philosophically minded, they may well think that the believer’s talk is the expression of what Richard Hare has called a blik, a way of feeling and thinking about the world which expresses itself in pseudo-assertions, pseudo because they are neither verifiable nor falsifiable and are therefore factually empty.’ The religious person speaks of God as a living reality in whose presence we are, and of a divine purpose which gives ultimate meaning to our lives.


Logical Positivist Natural Theology Religious Person Religious Pluralism John Hick 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Richard M. Hare, ‘Theology and Falsification’ in New Essays in Philosophical Theology, ed. Antony Flew and Alasdair Maclntyre (London: SCM; New York: Macmillan, 1955). Repr. in numerous places.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    R. B. Braithwaite, An Empiricist’s View of the Nature of Religious Belief (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1955). Repr. in numerous places.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Basil Mitchell, ‘Theology and Falsification’, in New Essays. Cf. Mitchell’s The Justification of Religious Belief (London: Macmillan; New York: Seabury Press, 1973) ch. 1.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    John Hick, ‘Theology and Verification’, Theology Today, vol. XVII (1960) pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  5. Repr. in numerous places, such as The Logic of God: Theology and Verification, ed. Malcolm L. Diamond and Thomas V. Litzenburg (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1975).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    W. Bean, ‘Eschatological Verification: Fortress or Fairyland?’, Methodos vol. XVI, no. 62 (1964); William T. Blackstone, The Problem of Religious Knowledge (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963) ch. 7;Google Scholar
  7. Carl-Reinhold Brakenheilm, How Philosophy Shapes Theories of Religion: An Analysis of Contemporary Philosophies of Religion with Special Regard to the Thought of John Wilson, John Hick and D. Z. Phillips (Lund: Gleerup, 1975) ch. 3;Google Scholar
  8. William H. Brenner, ‘Faith and Experience: A Critical Study of John Hick’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Religion’ (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1970) ch. 4;Google Scholar
  9. James I. Campbell, The Language of Religion (New York: Bruce, 1971) ch. 4;Google Scholar
  10. Edward Cell, Language, Existence and God (New York: Abingdon Press, 1971) ch. 8;Google Scholar
  11. Stephen T. Davis, ‘Theology, Verification, and Falsification’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. VI, no. 1 (1975); Peter Donovan, Religious Language (London: Sheldon Press, 1976) ch. 7; D. R. Duff-Forbes, ‘Theology and Falsification Again’, Australasian Journal of Theology, vol. XXXIX (1961);Google Scholar
  12. Rem B. Edwards, Religion and Reason (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972) ch. 14; Gregory S. Kavka, ‘Eschatological Falsification’, Religious Studies, vol. XII, no. 2 (1976);Google Scholar
  13. Kenneth H. Klein, Positivism and Christianity: A Study of Theism and Verifiability (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974) ch. 4; George I. Mavrodes, ‘God and Verification’, Canadian Journal of Theology, vol. XIX (1964);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. James Alfred Martin, The New Dialogue between Philosophy and Theology (New York: Seabury Press, and London: A. & C. Black, 1966) ch. 3;Google Scholar
  15. Basil Mitchell, The Justification of Religious Belief (London: Macmillan; New York: Seabury Press, 1973) ch. 1; Kai Nielsen, ‘Eschatological Verification’, Canadian Journal of Theology, vol. IX (1963), repr. in The Logic of God.Google Scholar
  16. Kai Nielsen, Contemporary Critiques of Religion (London: Macmillan; New York: Herder and Herder, 1971) ch. 4;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Terence Penelhum, Problems of Religious Knowledge (London: Macmillan; New York: Herder and Herder, 1971) ch. 4,Google Scholar
  18. Terence Penelhum, Religion and Rationality (New York: Random House, 1971) ch. 11;Google Scholar
  19. H. H. Price, Belief (London: George Allen and Unwin; New York: Humanities Press, 1969) ser. II, lecture 10;Google Scholar
  20. Paul F. Schmidt, Religious Knowledge (Glencoe, NY: The Free Press, 1961) ch. 4; Michael Tooley, ‘John Hick and the Concept of Eschatological Verification’, Religious Studies, vol. XII, no. 2 (1976);Google Scholar
  21. Keith E. Yandell, Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Religion (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1971) ch. 6.Google Scholar
  22. 9.
    Alvin Plantinga, God and Other Minds (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967) p. 168.Google Scholar
  23. 11.
    Herbert Feigl, ‘Some Major Issues and Developments in the Philosophy of Science of Logical Empiricism’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956) p. 15.Google Scholar
  24. 13.
    John Hick, Faith and Knowledge, 2nd edn (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966; and London: Macmillan, 1967) ch. 9,Google Scholar
  25. John Hick, Arguments for the Existence of God (London: Macmillan, 1970; and New York: Herder and Herder, 1971) ch. 7.Google Scholar
  26. 18.
    John Hick, ‘Religious Faith as Experiencing-as’ in Talk of God, ed. Godfrey Vesey (London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin’s Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  27. Repr. in John Hick, God and the Universe of Faiths (London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin’s Press, 1973), and elsewhere. Cf. also Chapter 2 above.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Hick 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Hick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ReligionClaremont Graduate SchoolClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations