Skip to main content

Abstract

The Declaration of the Rights of Man2 and the French Constitution of 1791 proclaim freedom of discussion and the liberty of the press in terms which are still cited in text-books3 as embodying maxims of French jurisprudence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Duguit et Monnier, Les Constitutions et les principales lois politiques de la France depuis 1789 (1898), Constitution du 3 Sept. 1791, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourguignon, Elements généraux de Législation française (1873), p. 468.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Déclaration des droits art. 11, Plouard, Les Constitutions françaises (1871–1876), p. 16; Duguit et Monnier, op. cit. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Odgers, Libel and Slander, Introduction (3rd ed., 1896), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Stephen, Digest of the Criminal Law (6th ed., 1904), arts. 96, 97, 98. [To secure a conviction a clear incitement to violence must be proved; The King v. Aldred (1909) 22 Cox 1; The King v. Caunt (1937) unreported.—En.] 2 Ibid. arts. 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Compare Odgers, Libel and Slander (6th ed., 1929), eh. xiv, with 1st ed., 1881, pp. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Queen v. Pooley (1857), cited Stephen, Digest of the Criminal Law (7th ed., 1926), p. 160, note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Rocquain, L’Esprit révolutionnaire avant la Révolution (1878), for a complete list of “Livres Condamnés” from 1715 to 1789. Rocquain’s book is full of information on the arbitrariness of the French Government during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Duguit, Traité de Droit constitutionnel (2nd ed., vol. v, 1925), ch. iii, para. 35, pp. 414, 415.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See for the control exercised over the press down to 1695, Odgers, Libel and Slander (6th ed., 1929), pp. 10–12;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holdsworth, History of English Law, vol. vi (1924), pp. 360–379, and vol. x (1938), pp. 28, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gardiner, History of England, vol. vii (1884), pp. 51, 130; ibid., vol. viii (1884), pp. 225, 234; Holdsworth, op. cit., vol. vi (1924), pp. 367–370.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Selden’s remarks on the illegality of the decrees of the Star Chamber, cited Gardiner, History of England, vol. vii (1884), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dicey, A.V. (1979). The Right to Freedom of Discussion. In: Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17968-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics