Skip to main content

Abstract

The seventh article of the Belgian constitution establishes in that country principles which have long prevailed in England. The terms thereof so curiously illustrate by way of contrast some marked features of English constitutional law as to be worth quotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For legal justification see Wade and Phillips, Constitutional Law (6th ed., 1960), pp. 466 ff., 674–676; Kenny, Outlines of Criminal Law (17th ed., 1958), pp. 535–540. ED.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Contrast with this the extraordinary remedies adopted under the old French monarchy for the punishment of powerful criminals. As to which see Fléchier, Mémoires de Fléchier sur les grands jours d’ Auvergne, en 1665 (1856).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Star Chamber Abolition Act, 1641, s. 8; Habeas Corpus Acts, 1679, 1816, and 1862; Wade and Phillips, Constitutional Law (6th ed., 1960), pp. 474–481;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forsyth, Cases and Opinions in Constitutional Law (1869), ch. xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The King v. Winton (1792) 5 T.R. 89; cf. Habeas Corpus Act, 1816, s. 2; see Corner, Practice of the Crown Side of the Court of Queen’s Bench (1844).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For Bail see Halsbury, Laws of England (3rd ed.), vol. x (1955), pp. 373–376, and Wade and Phillips, Constitutional Law (5th ed., 1955), p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See The Case of Pressing Mariners (1743) 18 St. Tr..1323; Stephen, Commentaries (14th ed., 1903), vol. ü, pp. 574, 575; cf. Corner, Forms of Writs and Other Proceedings on the Crown Side of the Court of Queen’s Bench (1844), p. 64, for form of habeas corpus for an impressed seaman.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Duguit, Manuel de Droit Public français, Droit Constitutionnel (1907), para. 76, pp. 510–513

    Google Scholar 

  9. article “Etat de Siège” in Chéruel, Dictionnaire historique des Institutions de la France (8th ed., 1910), vol. i, vo Etat de siège, p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dicey, A.V. (1979). The Right to Personal Freedom. In: Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17968-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics