Skip to main content

The Neo-corporatist Nations

  • Chapter
Business and Politics
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

The British often believe they have (and are believed by other people to have) unusually powerful unions and employers’ associations. It is certainly the case that, by almost any measure, British unions are stronger than American. Yet British unions in turn can be outmatched by their counterparts in many European countries, a fact their insular leaders often overlook. In Norway, Sweden and Austria, for example, the proportion of the workforce belonging to unions is over 80 per cent, a far higher proportion than in Britain. Nor is the strength of working-class movements confined solely to the industrial sector. In the European countries in which the unions are strongest, not surprisingly, the Social Democratic Party has also fared well. The classic example is of course Sweden, where the Social Democrats have dominated government since the early 1930s, forming the government continuously from 1936 to 1976. The combination of strong unions and almost continuous Social Democratic rule might fill the British or American businessman with despair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For an argument that neo-corporatist countries are more governable, see Philippe Schmitter, ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Western Europe and North America’, in Suzanne Berger (ed.), Organising Interests in Western Europe; Pluralism and the Transformation of Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The major article is again by Schmitter, ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’, Review of Politics, 36, no. 1 (January 1974) pp. 85–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The term ‘liberal corporatism’ is used by Gerhard Lehmbruch, ‘Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict and the New Corporatism’, in Philippe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation (London: Sage, 1979) pp. 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert B. Kvavik, Interest Groups in Norwegian Politics (Oslo: Universitetsførlaget, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For helpful summaries, see the chapters by Maria Szecsi, Felix Butschek and Peter Gerlich in Kurt Steiner (ed.), Modern Austria (Palo Alto, CA: Society for the Promotion of Science and Scholarship, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Donald Hancock, Sweden, The Politics of Post-Industrial Change (London and New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Samuel Beer, Modern British Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Schmitter, ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability’.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steven Kelman, Regulating America, Regulating Sweden; A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Graham K. Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, G.K. (1985). The Neo-corporatist Nations. In: Business and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17936-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics