Abstract
The British often believe they have (and are believed by other people to have) unusually powerful unions and employers’ associations. It is certainly the case that, by almost any measure, British unions are stronger than American. Yet British unions in turn can be outmatched by their counterparts in many European countries, a fact their insular leaders often overlook. In Norway, Sweden and Austria, for example, the proportion of the workforce belonging to unions is over 80 per cent, a far higher proportion than in Britain. Nor is the strength of working-class movements confined solely to the industrial sector. In the European countries in which the unions are strongest, not surprisingly, the Social Democratic Party has also fared well. The classic example is of course Sweden, where the Social Democrats have dominated government since the early 1930s, forming the government continuously from 1936 to 1976. The combination of strong unions and almost continuous Social Democratic rule might fill the British or American businessman with despair.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For an argument that neo-corporatist countries are more governable, see Philippe Schmitter, ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Western Europe and North America’, in Suzanne Berger (ed.), Organising Interests in Western Europe; Pluralism and the Transformation of Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
The major article is again by Schmitter, ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’, Review of Politics, 36, no. 1 (January 1974) pp. 85–131.
The term ‘liberal corporatism’ is used by Gerhard Lehmbruch, ‘Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict and the New Corporatism’, in Philippe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation (London: Sage, 1979) pp. 53–62.
Robert B. Kvavik, Interest Groups in Norwegian Politics (Oslo: Universitetsførlaget, 1976).
For helpful summaries, see the chapters by Maria Szecsi, Felix Butschek and Peter Gerlich in Kurt Steiner (ed.), Modern Austria (Palo Alto, CA: Society for the Promotion of Science and Scholarship, 1981).
M. Donald Hancock, Sweden, The Politics of Post-Industrial Change (London and New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972).
Samuel Beer, Modern British Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965).
See Schmitter, ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability’.
Steven Kelman, Regulating America, Regulating Sweden; A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981).
Copyright information
© 1985 Graham K. Wilson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, G.K. (1985). The Neo-corporatist Nations. In: Business and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17936-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17936-7_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-34092-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17936-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)