Abstract
The recent volatility of international trade and mounting pressures for protection have stimulated new interest in the role of adjustment in trade theory. An excellent cross-section of current research is provided by an NBER volume on import competition and adjustment (Bhagwati, 1982). These essays show that adjustment may be, or may appear to be, costly for several reasons. First, real resources may be required to switch factors of production from one activity to another, as in retraining or retooling.1 Second, adjustment may induce unemployment because of imperfections in factor markets.2 Third, adjustment may be made costly by policy; for example, subsidies to declining industries may raise costs above competitive levels for expanding industries.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. (ed.) (1982) Import Competition and Response (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Diamond, Peter A. (1982) ‘Protection, Trade Adjustment Assistance, and Income Distribution’, in J. N. Bhagwati (ed.), Import Competition and Response (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Dornbusch, Rudiger, Stanley Fischer and Paul A. Samuelson (1977) ‘Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods’, American Economic Review, no. 67, pp. 823–39.
Haberler, Gottfried (1950) ‘Some Problems in the Pure Theory of International Trade’, Economic Journal, vol. 60, pp. 223–40.
Krugman, Paul (1979) ‘A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87, pp. 253–66.
Mussa, Michael (1974) ‘Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: the Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, pp. 1191–203.
Mussa, Michael (1982) ‘Government Policy and the Adjustment Process’, in J. N. Bhagwati (ed.), Import Competition and Response, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Neary, J. Peter (1978) ‘Dynamic Stability and the Theory of Factor Market Distortions’, American Economic Review, no. 68, pp. 671–82.
Neary, J. Peter (1982) ‘Intersectoral Capital Mobility, Wage Stickiness, and the Case for Adjustment Assistance’, in J.N. Bhagwati (ed.), Import Competition and Response (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Petri, Peter A. (1980) ‘A Ricardian Model of Market Sharing’, Journal of International Economics, no. 10, pp. 201–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1985 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petri, P.A. (1985). International Trade Based on the Ability to Adjust. In: Jungenfelt, K., Hague, D. (eds) Structural Adjustment in Developed Open Economies. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17919-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17919-0_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17921-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17919-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)