Skip to main content
  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

In writing about freeze proposals, it is appropriate that I begin — to use the British parliamentary formula —by ‘declaring my interest’. I am in some sense one of those traditional arms control advocates who, while welcoming the freeze movement as mobilising almost unprecedented broad public support for arms control, nonetheless have reservations about the utility of the concept as an organising principle for a long-term, agreed structure for the US-Soviet nuclear relationship. My theme is that whatever those reservations may be, and I think they are justified, translating the concept into a plausibly definable and verifiable proposal should be directed at arranging a pause in the competition to give more focused negotiations a chance, not using the freeze concept as an organising principle for permanent structuring of the nuclear relationships between the superpowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Rotblat Sven Hellman

Copyright information

© 1985 Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slocombe, W. (1985). Proposals for a Nuclear Freeze. In: Rotblat, J., Hellman, S. (eds) Nuclear Strategy and World Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17878-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics