Abstract
In writing about freeze proposals, it is appropriate that I begin — to use the British parliamentary formula —by ‘declaring my interest’. I am in some sense one of those traditional arms control advocates who, while welcoming the freeze movement as mobilising almost unprecedented broad public support for arms control, nonetheless have reservations about the utility of the concept as an organising principle for a long-term, agreed structure for the US-Soviet nuclear relationship. My theme is that whatever those reservations may be, and I think they are justified, translating the concept into a plausibly definable and verifiable proposal should be directed at arranging a pause in the competition to give more focused negotiations a chance, not using the freeze concept as an organising principle for permanent structuring of the nuclear relationships between the superpowers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1985 Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slocombe, W. (1985). Proposals for a Nuclear Freeze. In: Rotblat, J., Hellman, S. (eds) Nuclear Strategy and World Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17878-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17878-0_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-39668-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17878-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)