Chemical Warfare: Status of Technological Developments and Deployments

  • Julian Perry Robinson

Abstract

This paper is about the present state of the technology of chemical weapons and its acquisition in different countries. It concentrates on matters thought most relevant to current discussion of chemical disarmament. In accordance with Article IX of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, negotiations are proceeding in the Geneva Conference on Disarmament for a complementary convention on chemical weapons.

Keywords

Chemical Weapon Chemical Warfare Agent Chemical Weapon Convention Johnston Atoll Soviet Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Swedish National Defence Research Institute. FOA orienterar om Chemical Warfare Agents June 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Swedish National Defence Research Institute, Department 4. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Protection against Chemical Warfare Agents FOA Report C40171–C2,C3, June 1983; and its Supplement FOA Report C 40174—C2, C3, August 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.G. Benz, ‘NBC defense–an overview, Part 1: protection equipment’, International Defense Review 16(12): (1983) 1783–1790;.Google Scholar
  4. K.G. Benz, ‘Part 2: detection and decontamination’, IDR 17 (2): (1984) 159–164.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    S. Franke et al, Lehrbuch der Militärchemie (2 vols, 2nd edition, Berlin: Deutscher Militärverlag, 1977)Google Scholar
  6. K-H Lohs, Synthetische Gifte (4th edition, Berlin: Deutscher Militärverlag, 1974)Google Scholar
  7. D. Martinetz, Immobilisation, Entgiftung and Zerstörung von Chemikalien (Leipzig: VEB Deutscher Verlag fur Grundstoffindustrie, 1980)Google Scholar
  8. R. Stohr et al. Chemische Kampfstoffe und Schutz vor chemischen Kapfstoffen (Berlin: Deutscher Militärverlag, 1977).Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    R. Klimek, L. Szinicz and N. Weger, Chemische Gifte und Kampfstoffe: Wirkung und Therapie (Stuttgart: Hippokrates Verlag, 1983).Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    B.L. Harris et al. ‘Chemicals in war’, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (3rd edition), 5, (1979) 393–416.Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare (6 vols, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1971–75).Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    R. Harris and J. Paxman, A Higher Form of Killing (London: Chatto and Windus, 1982).Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    R. Frailé, La Guerre Biologique et Chimique: Le Sort d’une Interdiction (Paris: Economica, 1982).Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    S. Murphy, A. Hay and S. Rose, No Fire, No Thunder (London: Pluto, 1984).Google Scholar
  15. 11.
    Klimek, Szincz and Weger, ibid (ref.5) pp.69–70.Google Scholar
  16. 12.
    I. Mather and R. McKie, ‘How Iraq built a secret horror plant’, The Observer (London), 11 March 1984, pp. 1, 11.Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    Defense Week, ‘Army abandons quest for chemical arms funds: new political tactics’, 13 February 1984, p.3.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    M.G. Voronkov, G.I. Zelchan and E.J. Lukevitz, (Silicon and Life) (Riga: Zinatne, 1971, in Russian).Google Scholar
  19. M.G. Voronkov. ‘Bio-organosilicon chemistry’, Chemistry in Britain 9 (9), (1973) 411–15.Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    D. Brown, ‘Foxes poisoned in Porton Down tests’, Daily Telegraph (London), 11 March 1984, p. 4.Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    R. Halloran, ‘US finds 14 nations now have chemical arms’, New York Times 20 May 1984, p. 22.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    K. Dalton, ‘Manila investigation into napalm bombing claim’, The Times (London), 26 September 1984, p. 4.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    J. Reed, ‘Chemical and biological warfare’, Defence, Communications and Security Review No. 83/3, pp. 45–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Perry Robinson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations