Skip to main content

Masters of Those Who Know — Plato, Aristotle and the Neoplatonists

  • Chapter
Medieval Thought

Part of the book series: New Studies in Medieval History

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

‘Master of those who know’ was Dante’s tribute to Aristotle whom in the Divine Comedy he saw accorded a place of honour in the highest state to which the unbaptised could aspire.1 It was a proper recognition of Aristotle’s pre-eminent influence on the intellectual life of the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. But Plato was to be found in the next room2 and had Dante been fully aware of his contribution to the medieval heritage he would doubtless have allowed of their closer association. With the benefit of a historian’s perspective, he might have extended the title not only to Aristotle’s own master but to their common disciples, the Neoplatonists, who were the principal channel of Platonism to the middle ages and who so profoundly influenced the formulation of Christian ideas in the patristic age. In a history of medieval thought the dominating contribution of these giants among ancient philosophers is a more obvious feature than the primacy of any one. They are conveniently treated together, for despite the differences between their systems they are linked in a direct line of intellectual descent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographies

A. Bibliography of Works in English

  • There are several good introductions to the thinkers considered here, among them: W. K. C. Guthrie, Socrates (Cambridge, 1971);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • G. M. A. Grube, Plato’s Thought (London, 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • I. M. Crombie, Plato, the Midwife’s Apprentice (London, 1964), who offer varying interpretations.

    Google Scholar 

  • See also J. E. Raven, Plato’s Thought in the Making (Cambridge, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. M. Cornford, Plato’s Cosmology (London; New York, 1937) presents the Timaeus.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Ackrill, Aristotle the Philosopher (Oxford, 1981) is a short review;

    Google Scholar 

  • W. D. Ross, Aristotle (5th edn; London, 1960) is standard;

    Google Scholar 

  • G. E. R. Lloyd, Aristotle, the Growth and Structure of his Thought (Cambridge, 1968) is a very stimulating presentation especially of Aristotle as a scientist.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. H. Armstrong, An Introduction to Ancient Philosophy (4th edn; London, 1970) is a readable general guide which covers Neoplatonism well.

    Google Scholar 

  • For more detail on late classical developments, see P. Merlan, From Platonism to Neoplatonism (3rd edn; The Hague, 1968),

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dillon, The Middle Platonists (London, 1977),

    Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Wallis, Neo-Platonism (London, 1972),

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Rist, Plotinus: the Road to Reality (Cambridge, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. H. Armstrong, ed., The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Booth, Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Islamic and Christian Thinkers (Cambridge, 1983), investigates the effect on medieval thinkers of the unresolved tension in Aristotle’s thought between the conception of individuals and universals.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The collection of papers by H. A. Wolfson, Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, I (Cambridge, Mass., 1973), contains important studies on several themes of central interest in the classical, patristic and later periods.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. O’Meara, ed., Neoplatonism and Christian Thought (Albany, New York, 1982), is useful generally on this subject and has treatment of Augustine, Eriugena and Aquinas.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Norris, God and World in Early Christian Theology. A Study in Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian and Origen (London, 1966) is a clear and readable review of this formative period.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. G. Patterson, God and History in Early Christian Thought. A Study of Themes from Justin Martyr to Gregory the Great (London, 1967) also provides useful background.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. N. D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines (5th edn; London, 1977), studies the development of patristic and conciliar theology. A Louth, The Origins of the Christian Mystical Tradition — From Plato to Denys (Oxford, 1981) is discursive but raises many points ofinterest to our subject.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Blumenthal and R. A. Markus, eds, Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought: Essays in honour of A. H. Armstrong (London, 1981) has several contributions of interest, especially regarding Augustine.

    Google Scholar 

B. Bibliography of Works in Other Languages

  • P. Henry, Plotin et l’Occident (Louvain, 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Flamant, Macrobe et le Néoplatonisme Larin à la Fin du IVe Siècle (Leiden, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • The collection, Platino e il néoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei; Rome, 1974), has several important articles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Michael Haren

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haren, M. (1985). Masters of Those Who Know — Plato, Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. In: Medieval Thought. New Studies in Medieval History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17856-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics