Knee-Capping Local Government

  • K. Newton
  • T. J. Karran
Chapter
Part of the Public Policy and Politics book series

Abstract

This final chapter will consider the current state of local finances, concentrating particularly on the topical and highly controversial question of recent government policy. The government has introduced some wide-reaching legislation in the last few years, with still more to come, and in this rapidly changing situation it is not possible to provide a completely up-to-date account of the system. It is also difficult to take a detached view of the particularly heated battle which envelops local government at present. Nevertheless most writers agree that the policies and practices of the Conservative governments elected in 1979 and 1983 introduce profound questions for the future of local democracy in Britain, so some attempt at an assessment of the present state of affairs should be made.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    For a fuller discussion of cash limits see N.P. Hepworth, The Finance of Local Government, revised 5th edn (London: Allen & Unwin, 1979), 41–2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See especially W.A. Robson, Local Government in Crisis, 2nd revised edn (London: Allen & Unwin, 1968).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance (Layfield Committee), Cmnd 6453 (London: HMSO, 1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    On this development see H. Wolman, ‘Understanding local government responses to fiscal pressure: a cross national analysis’, Journal of Public Policy, III, 3 (August 1983), 245–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Greenwood, ‘Fiscal pressure and local government in England and Wales’, in C. Hood and M. Wright (eds), Big Government in Hard Times (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981), 85–6.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    P. Self, ‘Rescuing local government’, The Political Quarterly, 53 (July–September 1982), 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    For a detailed discussion of the metropolitan counties see S. Bristow, D. Kermode and M. Mannin (eds), The Redundant Counties? (Ormskirk, Lancs: G.W. and A. Hesketh, 1983)Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    For an account of both financial and non-financial changes see M. Goldsmith and K. Newton, ‘Central-Local Government relations: the irresistible rise of centralised power’, in H. Berrington (ed.), Changes in British Politics (London: Frank Cass, 1984), 216–33.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    See R.A.W. Rhodes, ‘Continuity and change in British central-local relations: “The Conservative threat”, 1979–1983’, British Journal of Political Science, 14 (April 1984), 273–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    See, for example, A. Midwinter, M. Keating and P. Taylor, ‘Excessive and unreasonable: the politics of the Scottish hit lists’, Political Studies, 31 (September 1983), 394–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    G. Jones and J. Stewart, The Case for Local Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1983), 3.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    R. Pauley, Financial Times (4 August 1980)Google Scholar
  13. T. Travers, ‘The block grant and the recent development of the grant system’, Local Government Studies, 8 (May/June 1982), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    For figures and a discussion of local government spending, 1972–83, see R.A.W. Rhodes, The National World of Local Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985), ch. 4.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    J. Gretton and P. Gilder, ‘Local authority budgets 1982: responding to incentives’, Public Money, 2 (December 1982), 47.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    P. Dunleavy and R.A.W. Rhodes, ‘Beyond Whitehall’, in H. Drucker et al. (eds), Developments in British Politics (London: Macmillan, 1984), 128.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    See, for example, A. Midwinter, M. Keating and P. Taylor, ‘Current expenditure guidelines in Scotland: a failure of indicative planning’, Local Government Studies, 10 (March/April 1984), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    T. Travers, ‘Opposite effect’, Public Money, 1 (May 1982), 6–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Gibson, ‘Local “Overspending”: Why the Government have only themselves to blame’, Public Money, 3 (December 1983).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Jackman, The Rates Bill: A measure of desperation’, The Political Quarterly, 55 (April–June 1984), 169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N.P. Hepworth, The Finance of Local Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1972), 83.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    L.J. Sharpe and K. Newton, Does Politics Matter? The Determinants of Public Policy (Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coopers and Lybrand Associates, Streamlining the Cities (London: Coopers and Lybrand Associates, 1984).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance (Layfield Committee), Cmnd 6453 (London: HMSO, 1976), 56–7.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    See, for example, J. Knott, ‘Stabilization policy, grants-in-aid, and the federal system in Western Germany’, in W.E. Oates (ed.), The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington, 1977), 75–92.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Jackman, ‘Does central government need to control the total of local government spending?’, Local Government Studies, 8 (May/June 1982), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P.M. Jackson, ‘The impact of economic theories on local government finance’, Local Government Studies, 8 (January/February 1982), 31–2.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G.A. Almond and S.S. Verba, The Civic Culture (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1965), 141Google Scholar
  29. Commission of the Constitution, Research Paper no. 7, Devolution and other Aspects of Government: An Attitudes Survey (London: HMSO, 1973), 6Google Scholar
  30. S. Weir, ‘The citizen and the town hall’, New Society, 9 (March 1982), 346.Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    R. Jowell and C. Airey (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 1984 Report (London: Gower and Social and Community Planning Research, 1984), 29–30.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    C. Game, ‘Axeman or Taxman — who is now the more unpopular?’, Local Government Studies, 10 (January/February 1984), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 32.
    R. Rose, Getting by in three economies: The resources of the official, unofficial and domestic economies, Studies in Public Policy, no. 110 (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Centre for the Study of Public Policy, 1983), 13–14.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    S. Edgell and V. Duke, ‘Public expenditure cuts in Britain and consumption sectoral cleavages’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, VIII, 2 (1984), 177–201Google Scholar
  35. B. Heiser, ‘Testing public attitudes’, Municipal Review, 645 (April 1984), 14–15Google Scholar
  36. G. Hockley and G. Harbour, ‘People’s choice: public spending, taxation and local rates’, Public Money, 1 (March 1982), 11–14Google Scholar
  37. P. Beedle and P. Taylor-Gooby, ‘Ambivalence and Altruism: Public opinion about taxation and welfare’, Policy and Politics, 11 (January 1983), 15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R.M. Coughlin, Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy (Berkeley, Ca: Institute of International Studies, 1980), 129–54.Google Scholar
  39. 34.
    D.E. Ashford, ‘A Victorian drama: The fiscal subordination of local government’, in D.E. Ashford (ed.), Financing Urban Government in the Welfare State (London: Croom Helm, 1980), 71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© K. Newton and T. J. Karran 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Newton
  • T. J. Karran

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations