Skip to main content

Child Abuse as Disease

  • Chapter
Book cover The Politics of Child Abuse

Abstract

In Part One I have analysed the way in which the problem of child abuse emerged in Britain and the implications this has had for policy and practice. Throughout a number of assumptions about how the problem can be explained have had considerable influence on the nature of the societal response. More particularly, it has been assumed that the use of registers, case conferences, area review committees and improved interprofessional coordination will enhance the central aims of prevention, prediction and early identification. However, because of the pervading anxiety and the speed at which these changes were introduced, little attempt has been made to evaluate either the new policies and practices or the research and explanations on which they were based.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Revd. A. Morton, Foreword to R. L. Castle and A. M. Kerr, A Study of Suspected Child Abuse (NSPCC, 1972) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Heifer, ‘Basic issues concerning prediction’, in R. E. Heifer and C. H. Kempe (eds), Child Abuse and Neglect: The Family and the Community (Ballinger, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For an interesting critical analysis see S. Montgomery, ‘Problems in the Perinatal Prediction of Child Abuse’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 12, no. 2, 1982, pp. 189–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See also the discussion between Ray Heifer and Stuart Montgomery in ‘Correspondence’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 12, no. 6, 1982, pp. 669–672.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heifer, ‘Basic issues concerning prediction’, p. 364.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. M. Giovannoni, ‘Prevention of child abuse and neglect: research and policy issues’, Social Work Research and Abstracts, vol. 18, part 3, 1982, pp. 23–31, p. 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. G. Gil, Foreword to R. Volpe, M. Breton and J. Mitton, The Maltreatment of the School-Aged Child (Lexington Books, 1980) p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Giovannoni and R. M. Becerra, Defining Child Abuse (The Free Press, 1979) ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Zigler, ‘Controlling Child Abuse in America: An effort doomed to failure’, in R. Bourne and E. H. Newberger, Critical Perspectives on Child Abuse (Lexington Books, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Gelles, Family Violence (Saga, 1979) ch. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Dingwall, J. Eekelaar and T. Murray, The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life (Basil Blackwell, 1983); Giovannoni and Beccera, Defining Child Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. E. Heifer and C. H. Kempe, Child Abuse and Neglect: The Family and the Community (Ballinger, 1976) introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Martin, ‘A child-oriented approach to prevention of abuse’, in A. W. Franklin (ed.), Child Abuse: Prediction, Prevention and Follow-up (Churchill -Livingstone, 1978) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. W. Franklin, ‘Present pre-occupations’, in Franklin (ed.), Child Abuse: Prediction, Prevention and Follow-up, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. This section draws heavily upon L. J. Allan, ‘Child Abuse; A Critical Review of the Research and Theory’, in J. P. Martin (ed.), Violence in the Family (Wiley, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. J. Spinetta and D. Rigler, ‘The Child Abusing Parent: A Psychological Review’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 77, no. 4, 1972, pp. 296–304;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. D. Parke and C. W. Collmer, ‘Child Abuse, an interdisciplinary analysis’, in E. Mavis Hetherington (ed.), Review of Child Development Research vol. 5 (University of Chicago Press, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Sheppard, Perceptions of Child Abuse: A Critique of Individualism (Social Work Today and University of East Anglia, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.J. Gelles, ‘Violence in the Family: A Review of Research in the Seventies’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 42, 1980, pp. 873–85;

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. N. Friedrich and K. K. Wheeler, ‘The Abusing Parent Revisited: A Decade of Psychological Research’, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 170, no. 10, 1982, pp. 577–87;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Vesterdal, ‘Etiological Factors and Long Term Consequences of Child Abuse’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, vol. 27, no. 1, 1983, pp. 21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. F. Steele and C. B. Pollack, ‘A psychiatric study of parents who abuse infants and small children’, in R. E. Heifer and C. H. Kempe (eds), The Battered Child Syndrome (University of Chicago Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Borland (ed.), Violence in the Family (Manchester University Press, 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Baher, C. Hyman, C. Jones, R. Jones, A. Kerr and R. Mitchell, At Risk: An Account of the Work of the Battered Child Research Department, NSPCC (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  25. But see also S. M. Smith, R. Hanson and S. Noble, ‘Parents of battered babies: a controlled study’, British Medical Journal, no. 4, 1973, pp. 388–91.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Ounsted, R. Oppenheimer and J. Lindsay, ‘The psychopathology and psychotherapy of the families: aspects of bonding failure’ in A. W. Franklin (ed.), Concerning Child Abuse (Churchill Livingstone, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baher, Hyman, Jones, Jones, Kerr and Mitchell, At Risk; A. E. Skinner and R. C. Castle, 78 Battered Children: a retrospective study (NSPCC, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Lynch, D. Steinberg and C. Ounsted, ‘Family Unit in a Children’s Hospital’, British Medical Journal, no. 2, 1975, pp. 127–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. M. Smith, The Battered Child Syndrome (Butterworth, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. A. Hyman, ‘IQ of parents of battered babies’, British Medical Journal, no. 4, 1973, p. 739; Baher, Hyman, Jones, Jones, Kerr and Mitchell, At Risk.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. J. Merril, ‘Physical abuse of children: an agency study’, in V. de Francis, Protecting the Battered Child (Children’s Division, American Humane Association, 1962);

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. D. Bryant, ‘Physical Abuse of Children: an agency study’, Child Welfare, no. 42, 1963, pp. 125–30;

    Google Scholar 

  33. M.J. Boisvert, ‘The Battered Child Syndrome’, Social Casework, vol. 53, 1972, pp. 475–78; Skinner and Castle, 78 Battered Children.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baher, Hyman, Jones, Jones, Kerr and Mitchell, At Risk.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. J. Gelles, ‘Child Abuse as Psychopathology: A Sociological Critique and Reformulation’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, no. 43, July 1973, pp. 611–21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. Bourne, ‘Child Abuse and Neglect: An Overview’, in Bourne and Newberger, Critical Perspectives on Child Abuse, pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Skinner and Castle, 78 Battered Children; J. E. Oliver, J. Cox, A. Taylor and J. A. Baldwin, ‘Severely ill-treated children in North East Wiltshire’, Research Report No. 4 Oxford Record Linkage Study (Oxford Area Health Authority, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  38. D. Gil, Violence Against Children (Harvard University Press, 1970); Smith, The Battered Child Syndrome.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Steele and Pollock, ‘A psychiatric study of parents who abuse infants and small children’.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Baher, Hyman, Jones, Kerr and Mitchell, At Risk.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. C. Hotter and S. B. Friedman, ‘Child Abuse: early case findings in the emergency department’, Paediatrics, no. 42, July 1968, pp. 128–38;

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Simons, ‘Child Abuse: Epidemiological Study of Medically Reported Cases’, New York State Journal of Medicine, no. 66 1966, pp. 2783–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Skinner and Castle, 78 Battered Children; A. H. Green, ‘Child Abuse — Pathological Syndrome of Family Interaction’, American Journal of Psychiatry, no. 131, 1974, pp. 882–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. M. Smith and R. Hanson, ‘134 Battered Children: a medical and psychological study’, British Medical Journal, no. 3, 1974, pp. 666–70; Gil, Violence Against Children.

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Elmer and G. Gregg, ‘Developmental Characteristics of Abused Children’, Paediatrics, no. 40, 1967, pp. 596–602;

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Klein and C. Stern, ‘Low Birth Weight and the Battered Child Syndrome’, American Journal of Diseases of Children, no. 122, 1971, pp. 15–18;

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. A. Lynch, ‘Ill-health and Child Abuse’, Lancet, 17 August 1975, pp. 317–19.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Richards, ‘Non-Accidental Injury in an Ecological Perspective’, in DHSS Non-Accidental Injury to Children (HMSO, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  49. N. Rose, Registers of Suspected Non-Accidental Injury (NSPCC, 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Rutter, ‘A Child’s Life’, New Scientist, no. 62, 1975, pp. 763–6.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Skinner and Castle, 78 Battered Children; Smith, The Battered Child Syndrome; E. Elmer, Children in Jeopardy (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967); Baher, Hyman, Jones, Jones, Kerr and Mitchell, At Risk.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Smith, The Battered Child Syndrome.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Spinetta and Rigler, ‘The Child Abusing Parent: A Psychological Review’.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gelles, ‘Child Abuse as Psychopathology: A Sociological Critique and Reformulation’.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Spinetta and Rigler, ‘The Child Abusing Parent: A Psychological Review’.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Allan, ‘Child Abuse: A Critical Review of the Research and Theory’, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See in particular Friedrich and Wheeler, ‘The Abusing Parent Revisited: A Decade of Psychological Research’.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See in particular S. Wasserman, ‘The abused parent of the abused child’, Children, no. 14, 1967, pp. 175–9;

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. E. Oliver and A. Taylor, ‘Five generations of ill-treated children in one family pedigree’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, pp. 473–80.

    Google Scholar 

  60. S. Jayarantne, ‘Child Abusers as parents and children: A review’, Social Work, January 1977, pp. 5–9;

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Kadushin, Child Welfare Services (Macmillan, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  62. M. Benjamin, ‘Abused as a Child, Abusive as a Parent: Practitioners Beware’, in R. Volpe, M. Bretton and J. Mitton, The Maltreatment of the School-Aged Child (Lexington, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Friedrich and Wheeler, ‘The Abusing Parent Revisited: A Decade of Psychological Research’, p. 585.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Giovannoni, ‘Prevention of Child abuse and neglect: research and policy issues’, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  65. A. H. Cohn and J. Garbarino, ‘Toward a Refined Approach to Preventing Child Abuse’, National Committee for Prevention of Child Abuse (mimeographed 1981) quoted in Giovannoni, ‘Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect: research and policy issues’.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Particularly see J. W. Hinton (ed.), Dangerousness: Problems of Assessment and Prediction (Allen & Unwin, 1981);

    Google Scholar 

  67. J. R. Hamilton and H. Freeman (eds), Dangerousness: Psychiatry, Assessment and Management (Gaskell, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  68. A. E. Bottoms, ‘Reflections on the Renaissance of Dangerousness’, The Howard Journal of Penology and Crime Prevention, vol. XVI, no. 2, 1977, pp. 70–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. S. J. Pfohl, ‘Deciding on Dangerousness: Predictions of Violence as Social Control’, Crime and Social Justice, vol. 11, spring/summer, 1979, pp. 28–40, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  70. R. Hanson, W. McCulloch and S. Hartley, ‘Key characteristics of child abuse’, in Franklin (ed.), Child Abuse: Prediction, Prevention and Follow-up.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Smith, The Battered Child Syndrome.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hanson, McCulloch and Hartley, ‘Key characteristics of child abuse’, p. 49, my italics.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hanson, McCulloch and Hartley, ‘Key characteristics of child abuse’, p. 49, my italics.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hanson, McCulloch and Hartley, ‘Key characteristics of child abuse’, p. 52, my italics.

    Google Scholar 

  75. R. S. Kempe and C. H. Kempe, Child Abuse (Open Books, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  76. See also J. D. Gray, C. A. Cutler, J. G. Dean and C. H. Kempe, ‘Prediction and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 1, no. 1, 1977, pp. 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Kempe and Kempe, Child Abuse, pp. 80–1.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kempe and Kempe, Child Abuse, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kempe and Kempe, Child Abuse, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  80. G. T. Lealman, D. Haigh, J. M. Phillips, J. Stoan and C. Ord-Smith, ‘Prediction and Prevention of Child Abuse — an Empty Hope?’, Lancet, no. 8339, 25 June 1983, pp. 1423–4.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Drawing on previous published work which drew upon retrospective studies a checklist of predictions was drawn up. The major factors were: mother under 20 years at birth of first born; mother booked at antenatal clinic after 20 weeks; mother other than married at delivery. The minor factors were: step-children in the family; psychiatric history; previous referral to social worker; termination of pregnancy requested but refused; complications of pregnancy or delivery; baby admitted to special care baby unit; mother took own or infant’s discharge against advice. The studies used were M. A. Lynch and J. Roberts, ‘Predicting child abuse: signs of bonding failure in the maternity hospital’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1, 1977, pp. 624–6;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. R. R. Gordon, ‘Predicting child abuse’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1, 1977, p. 841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lealman, Haigh, Phillips, Stoan and Ord-Smith, ‘Prediction and Prevention of Child Abuse — an Empty Hope?’, p. 1424.

    Google Scholar 

  84. See Gray, Cutler, Dean and Kempe, ‘Prediction and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect’, pp. 47–8 for a more detailed description of what this entailed.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kempe and Kempe, Child Abuse, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  86. See note 59.

    Google Scholar 

  87. See note 59.

    Google Scholar 

  88. A. H. Cohn and M. K. Miller, ‘Evaluating New Modes of Treatment for Child Abusers and Neglectors: The Experience of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects in the USA’, Child Abuse and Neglect, The International Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, 1977, p. 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. See note 59.

    Google Scholar 

  90. See I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young, The New Criminology: for a Social Theory of Deviance (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973) chs 2 and 3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  91. J. Young, ‘Thinking seriously about crime: some models of criminology’ and R. J. Sapsford, ‘Individual Deviance: the search for the criminal personality’, both in M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan and J. Pawson (eds), Crime and Society: Readings in History and Theory (Routledge & Kegan Paul and Open University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  92. J. Newson and E. Newson, Four Tears Old in an Urban Community (Allen & Unwin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  93. W. Ryan, Blaming the Victim (Vintage, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  94. S. K. Steinmetz and M. A. Straus (eds), Violence in the Family (Harper & Row, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  95. M. A. Straus, ‘A Sociological Perspective on the Causes of Family Violence’, in M. R. Green (ed.), Violence in the Family (Boulder, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  96. C. Brewer and J. Lait, Can Social Work Survive? (Temple Smith, 1980) p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Brewer and Lait, Can Social Work Survive?, pp. 82–3.

    Google Scholar 

  98. E. H. Newberger and J. H. Daniel, ‘Knowledge and Epidemiology of Child Abuse: A Critical Review of Concepts’, Pediatrics Annals, vol. 5, part 3, pp. 140–4.

    Google Scholar 

  99. E. Elmer, ‘Traumatized Children, Chronic Illness and Poverty’, in L. H. Pelton (ed.), The Social Context of Child Abuse and Neglect (Human Sciences Press, 1981) p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Nigel Parton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parton, N. (1985). Child Abuse as Disease. In: The Politics of Child Abuse. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17830-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics