Skip to main content

Nuclear Energy

  • Chapter
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

Nuclear energy is the most concentrated form of energy in use today. In the social sphere, the control of nuclear energy is no less concentrated. The two go together and any worthwhile discussion must cover both aspects.

‘Reducing the concentration of power will automatically reduce the size of corruption. This is not to say that it will eliminate corruption, only make it more visible and perhaps manageable’

Michael Zwerin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sixth Report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (The Flowers Report), Cmnd 6618, HMSO, London, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyle, F., Astronomy, Macdonald, London, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pease, R. S., ‘Progress and Prospects of Nuclear Fusion’, Royal Society of Arts Journal, August, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. The JET Undertaking Culham Laboratory, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pease, R. S., ‘Fusion Research 25 years after Zeta’, New Scientist, 20 January 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. Semat, H. and Albright, J. R., ‘Introduction to Atomic and Nuclear Physics’, Chapman and Hall, London, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan, G. A., ‘A natural fission reactor’, Scientific American, July 1986, p. 36

    Google Scholar 

  8. Canadians close in on CANDU’s cracked reputation’, New Scientist, 6 October 1983, p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cottrell will head PWR safety panel’, New Scientist, 16 June 1983, p. 61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, J. E. and Crosland, I. G., ‘Fin waving, bolt strain and the railings round St. Pauls’, Endeavour, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1979, p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nuclear Engineering International, Charts of individual reactors in The World’s Reactor Series Full colour sectional drawings, IPC, Sutton, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  12. United States Atomic Energy Commission, The Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors (Light Water Cooled) and Related Facilities, WASH-1250, USAEC, Washington D.C., 1973

    Google Scholar 

  13. United States Atomic Energy Commission, An Assessment of Accident Risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-1400, USAEC, Washington D.C., 1974

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patterson, W. C., Nuclear Power, 2nd edn, Penguin, London, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  15. A rocky graveyard for nuclear waste’, New Scientist, 15 September 1983, p. 756

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hannah, L., Engineers, Managers and Politicians: The first fifteen years of nationalised electricity supply in Britain, Macmillan, London, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krass, A. S., Boskma, P., Elzen, B. and Smit, W. A., Uranium enrichment and nuclear weapon proliferation, Taylor and Francis, London, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pringle, P. and Spigelman, J., The Nuclear Barons, Michael Joseph, London, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shrader-Frechette, K. S., Nuclear Power and Public Policy: the social and ethical questions of fission technology, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. National Radiological Protection Board, Gut uptake of plutonium, americium and curium, R-129, HMSO, London, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sellafield cuts plutonium discharges’, New Scientist, 13 October 1983, p. 73

    Google Scholar 

  22. Secrets of the Windscale fire revealed’, New Scientist, 29 September 1983, p. 911

    Google Scholar 

  23. Atom bomb test leaves infamous legacy’, Science, Vol. 218, 15 October 1982, p. 266; ‘Scientists implicated in atom test deception, Science, Vol. 218, 5 November 1982, p. 545

    Google Scholar 

  24. Japan National Preparatory Committee, International Symposium on the Damage and After Effects of the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Pergamon, London, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  25. International Atomic Energy Agency, Annual Report for 1981 IAEA, Vienna, 1982 (GC(XXVD1664)), p. 57

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the European Atomic Energy Community and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (with Protocol) Cmnd 6730, HMSO, London, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hesketh, R. V., ‘Social pressures on the use of plutonium from the civil nuclear programme’, in Issues in the Sizewell ‘B’Inquiry, Vol. 5, Centre for Energy Studies, Polytechnic of the South Bank, London, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zaleski, C. P., Nuclear Energy in Today’s World: Paradise Lost, Hell, or just Purgatory?, British Nuclear Energy Society, London, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marrone, J., ‘The Price-Anderson Act: The Insurance Industry’s View’, Forum, XII(2), Winter 1977, p. 607

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Sixth Report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (The Flowers Report), Cmnd 6618, HMSO, London, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, Sir Brian, ‘Nuclear Power and Public Policy’, Journal of the British Nuclear Energy Society, No. 16, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ranger Uranium Environmental Enquiry First Report (The Fox Report), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, W. C., Nuclear Power, 2nd edn, Penguin, London, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fissile Society Earth Resources Research, London, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, P. and Spigelman, J., The Nuclear Barons, Michael Joseph, London, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowing, M., Britain and Atomic Energy 1939–45, Macmillan, London, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowing, M., Independence and Deterrence, Macmillan, London, 1974

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L., Engineers, Managers and Politicians, Macmillan, London, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Hinton, Heavy Electric Current Engineering in the United Kingdom, Pergamon, London, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, R. G. and Anderson, O. E., The New World 1939–1946, Pennsylvania State University Press, Pittsburg, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, R. G. and Duncan, F., Atomic Shield 1947–1952, Pennsylvania State University Press, Pittsburg, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, R. F., Nuclear Power: its Development in the United Kingdom, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., The Nuclear Power Decisions, Croom Helm, London, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, D., Nuclear Power and the Energy Crisis, Macmillan, London, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, S. (ed.), The Fast Breeder Reactor: Need? Cost?Risk? Macmillan, London,1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. S., Nuclear Power and Public Policy, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Diana Schumacher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schumacher, D. (1985). Nuclear Energy. In: Energy: Crisis or Opportunity?. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17797-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics