Abstract
In contrast to psychology, which concentrates on attributes of the individual mind and personality, sociological analysis looks at man in his social setting, arguing that attitudes ‘are shaped by the cultural traditions, social institutions, and group norms of the society in which every individual finds himself’.1 Sociologists draw on the considerable evidence that individuals acquire many of their attitudes and values ready-made from the groups to which they belong. Individual psychological factors may modify or refine these socially acquired attitudes, but the social setting narrows the effective choices which individuals may make. Not all possible courses of action can ever be considered. In any society there will be certain responses accepted as so natural as to be beyond debate, and certain others so unnatural as to be unworthy of serious attention. Thus while the psychologists have been preoccupied with how the individual mind and nervous system respond to stimuli, the sociologists have been more concerned with how the society itself, or organisations within it, and the constraints of class, race, citizenship, religion, profession, etc., limit the range of stimuli and prescribe the possible responses that may be made to them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, ‘Public Opinion and the Classical Tradition: A Re-evaluation’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 1979, 148.
H. C. Kelman, ‘Process of Opinion Change’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 1961, 63.
F. I. Greenstein, ‘Political Socialization’, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 14, 1968, 551.
Roberta Sigel, ‘Assumptions About the Learning of Political Values’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 361, 1965, 1.
D. A. Saunders, ‘Social Ideas in McGuffey Readers’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 5, 1941, 579.
D. D. Searing et al., ‘The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems’, American Political Science Review, 67, 1973, 415–32.
David Marsh, ‘Political Socialization: The Implicit Assumptions Questioned’, British Journal of Political Science, 1, 1971, 454–65.
R. E. Lane, ‘Fathers and Sons: Foundations of Political Belief, American Sociological Review, 24, 1959, 502–11.
R. W. Connell, ‘Political Socialization in the American Family: the Evidence Re-examined’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 1972, 323–33.
Edgar Litt, ‘Civic Education, Community Norms, and Political Indoctrination’, American Sociological Review, 28, 1963, 69–75.
J. D. Halloran, Attitude Formation and Change, 1967, 41. Note also I. D. Steiner, ‘Primary Group Influences on Public Opinion’, American Sociological Review, 19, 1954, 260–7.
S. H. Chaffee et al., ‘Mass Communication and Political Socialization’, Journalism Quarterly, 47, 1970, 647–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1985 Terence H. Qualter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qualter, T.H. (1985). The Sociology of Attitude Change. In: Opinion Control in the Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17775-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17775-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17777-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17775-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)